Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1049325 normal
Bug #1049325 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: netatalk/3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u1
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1049325:
Dear Graham,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 07:35:46AM +, Graham Inggs wrote:
>
> Please go ahead.
I just did a source-only upload. Will keep an eye on the buildds.
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 21:26:24 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2023-08-30 16:54, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Luca Boccassi and I have been preparing stable and oldstable updates for
> > debootstrap so that the transition described in DEP-17 can continue.
> > Because DEP-17 involves changes to
Control: tags -1 = bullseye d-i
[ Reason ]
The same changes proposed for bookworm in #1050868, but for bullseye.
Because official buildds that build trixie/sid are not yet all running
bookworm, we'll need this change in bullseye too.
I also included the changes that Luca previously proposed on
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 = bullseye d-i
Bug #1025708 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
debootstrap/1.0.123+deb11u2
Added tag(s) d-i; removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1025708: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025708
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: severity -1 important
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-netatalk-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Dear Debian Release Team,
Please allow me to raise the severity for this ticket.
The patches address 9 public CVE advisories, and I think it would be beneficial
to Bullseye users to have a patched package.
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1049325 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: netatalk/3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u1
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
--
1049325: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1049325
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tags -1 + d-i
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 16:27:12 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Part of the transition to merged-/usr, and more specifically, allowing
> us to stop shipping files in trixie whose physical path on disk does
> not match their path in the dpkg database due to directory
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + d-i
Bug #1050868 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
debootstrap/1.0.128+nmu2+deb12u1
Added tag(s) d-i.
--
1050868: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050868
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
(links with further content at the end)
Hi ftp, security, and release teams,
as far as I am aware each of you is currently maintaining some
sort of OpenPGP signing key for apt repositories.
As part of my apt-sign work, I'd like to gather some knowledge
as to what are the needs for signing keys
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:ruby-roxml
Bug #1050885 [release.debian.org] RM: ruby-roxml/4.2.0-1 (from testing)
Added indication that 1050885 affects src:ruby-roxml
--
1050885: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050885
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: ruby-ro...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ruby-roxml
Please remove ruby-roxml from testing.
- it is broken in testing due to #1050580, which blocks the migration of
Hi,
On 2023-08-30 16:54, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-m...@lists.debian.org, bl...@debian.org,
> debian-wb-t...@lists.debian.org
>
> Luca Boccassi and I have been preparing stable and oldstable updates for
> debootstrap so that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-m...@lists.debian.org, bl...@debian.org,
debian-wb-t...@lists.debian.org
Luca Boccassi and I have been preparing stable and oldstable updates for
debootstrap so that the transition described in DEP-17 can continue.
Because DEP-17
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:debootstrap
Bug #1050868 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
debootstrap/1.0.128+nmu2+deb12u1
Added indication that 1050868 affects src:debootstrap
> block 1025708 by -1
Bug #1025708 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debootst...@packages.debian.org, hel...@subdivi.de
Control: affects -1 + src:debootstrap
Control: block 1025708 by -1
[ Reason ]
Part of the transition to
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2023 07:58:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1043591: transition: libnfs
has caused the Debian Bug report #1043591,
regarding transition: libnfs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1028633
Bug #1042896 [release.debian.org] transition: armadillo
1042896 was not blocked by any bugs.
1042896 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1042896: 1028633
--
1042896: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042896
Control: block -1 by 1028633
On 8/30/23 09:13, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
I could not build mlpack since the build failed, but I am sure it's
not due to pip. Here is the extract from the failed build log:
-- After much of the build
mkdir: cannot create directory '/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/':
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1042896 [release.debian.org] transition: armadillo
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1042896: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042896
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Kumar
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 07:22, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Thanks for the response. I have build the following packages
> successfully using the new Armadillo:
>
> gdal
> gnss-sdr
> phyx
> seer
> tvc
Great!
> I could not build mlpack since the build failed, but I
Dear Graham,
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 10:53:47AM +, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi Kumar
>
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 13:48, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > I have uploaded the new Armadillo to experimental. I would like your
> > permission to upload it to unstable. binNMUs should be sufficient for
> > the
Will try to help on that date :)
Den tis 29 aug. 2023 kl 19:27 skrev Jonathan Wiltshire :
>
> > >Let's say 30 Sep is still preferred, 7th Oct or at a stretch 14th Oct are
> > >options. Please indicate your availability for those three.
>
> Right, 7th October seems to be the one. Usual
23 matches
Mail list logo
