Hi,
unfortunately, this mail left my system before it was complete. See below.
On Sa 06 Jan 2024 08:36:21 CET, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Please unblock the recent bullseye-pu upload of libmateweather.
[ Reason ]
Main reason for providing the pu is that Aviation Weather changed their
data server
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: libmateweat...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libmateweather
Please unblock the recent bullseye-pu upload of libmateweather.
[ Reason ]
Main reason
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:libmateweather
Bug #1060130 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
libmateweather/1.24.1-1+deb11u1
Added indication that 1060130 affects src:libmateweather
--
1060130: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060130
Debian Bug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: libmateweat...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libmateweather
A minor fix has been released as libmateweather 1.26.3 which shall be
cherry-picked into
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:libmateweather
Bug #1060129 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
libmateweather/1.26.0-1.1+deb12u2
Added indication that 1060129 affects src:libmateweather
--
1060129: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060129
Debian Bug
Quoting Paul Gevers (2024-01-05 20:15:22)
> Thanks for reaching out.
Thank Helmut for poking me in #debian-apt :)
> For britney2, the Sources stanza would also be needed; then we could use this
> to generate britney2 testcases. I created 10 of those yesterday by hand [1].
>
> The simplest for
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: at...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:atril
While preparing a new upstream release upload of atril 1.26.1-1 to
unstable (already some days ago), a
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:atril
Bug #1060122 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package atril/1.26.0-2+deb12u1
Added indication that 1060122 affects src:atril
--
1060122: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060122
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 05:36:10PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > My strawman proposal is to give this thread 2 weeks from today for feedback
> > and further refinement, and also to further reduce the number of
> > false-positives included in the transition. Then, starting on Jan 18:
> > -
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@debian.org
Imagemagick will need a new major bump
I achieved to get imagemagick 7 build for experimental (it is only on salsa not
uploaded yet).
Every
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2024 22:30:14 +0100
with message-id <62c54826-144d-431d-b3c4-1ad05bf2b...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: release.debian.org: Patch to make heidi output optional
has caused the Debian Bug report #812155,
regarding release.debian.org: Patch to make heidi output
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2024 22:16:44 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1057304: nmu: ros2-performance-test-fixture_0.2.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1057304,
regarding nmu: ros2-performance-test-fixture_0.2.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2024 22:14:58 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1059597: transition: papi
has caused the Debian Bug report #1059597,
regarding transition: papi
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2024 22:14:30 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1059026: transition: rocksdb
has caused the Debian Bug report #1059026,
regarding transition: rocksdb
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2024 22:13:47 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1059358: transition: wolfssl
has caused the Debian Bug report #1059358,
regarding transition: wolfssl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #971739 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: britney thinks ghostscript
B-D on libz-dev:native is unsatisfiable
Added tag(s) pending.
--
971739: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971739
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
On 03-01-2024 20:40, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 03-01-2024 20:22, Simon McVittie wrote:
I think all of those are correct?
I think that if apt allows you to install it, chances are that it's a
britney2 bug. I'll try to debug it tomorrow.
I have a first proposal for
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #1059929 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org:
gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1059929: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059929
Debian Bug Tracking System
Hi Steve,
On 05-01-2024 17:36, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Also a problem is that experimental also might already contain totally
unrelated updates like new upstream versions...
I share this worry. Have you thought about how to handle the cases where
you don't have experimental to upload to? How
Hi,
Thanks for reaching out.
On 05-01-2024 07:45, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
It would generate the following two stubs (shortened here for brevity):
Package: pkga
Version: 1
Architecture: amd64
Depends: pkgc:any
Multi-Arch: no
Package: pkgb
Version: 1
Architecture: amd64
Hi Steve
> - perl will also get a sourceful upload, to manually handle 'perlapi'
> Provides.
Can we combine this one with the upcoming perl transition? See #1055955.
Here are some more comments on individual packages.
> 22 libobs-dev
That's a change to the plugin ABI only.
> 14 gnuradio
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:05:57PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Jan 2024 at 00:17:04 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > - In multi-library packages, there is no reliable way to map from a set of
> > headers in a dev package to specific shared libraries in a runtime library
> >
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:g2clib
Bug #1060077 [release.debian.org] transition: g2clib
Added indication that 1060077 affects src:g2clib
--
1060077: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060077
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: g2c...@packages.debian.org, sramac...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:g2clib
There is a minor transition I wish to proceed. g2clib upstream have added an
SOVERSION
Hi,
Am 05.01.24 um 09:17 schrieb Steve Langasek:
- Packages that could not be analyzed for whatever reason are still
assumed to have an ABI that's sensitive to time_t and have to be included
in the transition. Happily, due to improvements in this run of the number
of packages that
On 2023-12-20 23:31, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2023-12-18 19:02:51 +0100, Drew Parsons wrote:
I'd like to upgrade PETSc (and SLEPc, and their python packages)
from 3.18 to 3.19.
All packages are now built or rebuilt with tests passing.
(except for deal.ii
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:tpm2-tss
Bug #1060058 [release.debian.org] transition: tpm2-tss
Added indication that 1060058 affects src:tpm2-tss
--
1060058: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060058
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
On Fri, 05 Jan 2024 at 00:17:04 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> - In multi-library packages, there is no reliable way to map from a set of
> headers in a dev package to specific shared libraries in a runtime library
> package that's not additionally computationally prohibitive; we therefore
>
Hi folks,
Once again, coming back around to the question of an archive-wide migration
for time_t[0].
We have a clear path forward on the toolchain side
(https://bugs.debian.org/1037136), and we have an updated ABI analysis done
against current Debian unstable as of 2023-12-18, superseding the
29 matches
Mail list logo