Contacting Release team with invitation to DebConf talk and specific questions to team members

2024-05-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, while I contacted the release team previously[0] there was no response so far. I tried to establish this first contact since I consider the release team of really high relevance. Meanwhile I have added some more information to my contact mails including advertising a DebConf event (see

Bug#1070723: bullseye-pu: package bart/0.6.00-3+deb11u1

2024-05-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Wed, May 08, 2024 at 01:18:44AM +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: bullseye > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > X-Debbugs-Cc: b...@packages.debian.org, sanv...@debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:bart > > [

Contacting Release team

2024-05-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, as promised I'd like to contact all teams inside Debian which I like to do today to the release team. Currently I don't have any urgent questions for your team. More general I would love to learn how you organise / share your workload. Do you have some regular team meatings? If yes I'd

Re: Status of the t64 transition

2024-04-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sebastian, thank you for your work on t64 transition. Am Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 09:22:02PM +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: I've spotted these Debian Med packages. > gentle > jellyfish > quorum > sbmltoolbox No idea how we can help here. Please let us know if we can do something. > anfo

Bug#1054657: Transition ready? (Was: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics))

2023-12-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, Am Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 02:11:47PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs: > There are some packages that have still not migrated since the > previous r-api-bioc-3.17 transition in July 2023. > > Links to their tracker pages, which should tell you what is needed, follow: > >

Bug#1054657: Transition ready? (Was: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics))

2023-12-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, Am Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 09:56:14PM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers: > > > Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by tille, a new > > > source-only upload is needed to allow migration > > > > I do not understand this line. What exact package needs a source-only > > upload? > > You

Bug#1054657: Transition ready? (Was: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics))

2023-12-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, Am Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:13:54PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs: > I've added removal hints for r-bioc-dss and r-bioc-demixt. Please > file an RC bug for r-bioc-dss to prevent it from migrating straight > back (r-bioc-demixt already has #1058278). Done for r-bioc-dss. > One problem I

Bug#1054657: Transition ready? (Was: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics))

2023-12-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, as you might have noticed the upstream source for r-bioc-dss and r-bioc-demixt are missing and upstream did not answered two mails about this. Since the transition looks clean for me so far[1] after I fixed two autopkgtest issues yesterday I (naively) think we could remove r-bioc-dss and

Bug#1054657: Source archive of DSS missing

2023-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, could someone please have a look at the source download? Thank you Andreas. Am Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 04:04:27PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi, > > when looking at > > https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DSS.html > > and following the

Bug#1054657: Source download of DeMixT broken

2023-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, could someone please have a look at the source download? Thank you Andreas. Am Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 04:01:17PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi, > > when looking at > > https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DeMixT.html > > and follo

Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 01:36:38PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > > OK, but what is your suggestion? Reverting and have broken tests due to > > the pandoc issue? > > pandoc is fixed in unstable. Really? Salsa CI[1] says: pandoc : Depends: pandoc-data (>= 3.0.1+ds) but 3.0.1-3 is to be

Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sebastian, Am Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:29:24AM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > > > I found a workaround; demote pandoc from a Depends to a Recommends in > > > the r-cran-rmarkdown package. It seems that pandoc is not used for > > > building, at least for r-bioc-biovizbase, -degnorm,

Bug#1054657: Source archive of DSS missing

2023-12-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, when looking at https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DSS.html and following the link "Source Archive" at bottom of the page linking to https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.18/bioc/src/contrib/Archive/DSS/ I can only see Page Not Found The page you were looking

Bug#1054657: Source download of DeMixT broken

2023-12-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, when looking at https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DeMixT.html and following the link "Source Archive" at bottom of the page linking to https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.18/bioc/src/contrib/Archive/DeMixT/ I can only see Page Not Found The page you were

Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:09:28PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > I'll take this > occurence as a reason to fail with an error in dh-r to avoid such cases > in future. Done in https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/dh-r/-/commit/e4c348832b3d99ba7bc8f7670085b9b21323f7b6 The check coul

Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, Am Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:37:02PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs: > On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 07:21, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I have no idea how to work around this. > > I found a workaround; demote pandoc from a Depends to a Recommends in > the r-cran-rmarkdown

Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Adrian, Am Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 11:15:49PM +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > > And it also means that r-bioc-biocgenerics is now blocked on the haskell > > transition. Lovely. Good thing that pandoc is supposed to be the last piece > > in that several months long transition. > > It's only blocked

Bug#1054657: Removed in Bioconductor 3.18: NanoStringQCPro

2023-12-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Steffen, you are listed as Uploader of r-bioc-nanostringqcpro. This package was removed by Bioconductor in release 3.18. Please decide what to do with this package and act accodingly. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 09:51:38PM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers: > > And it also means that r-bioc-biocgenerics is now blocked on the haskell > transition. Lovely. Good thing that pandoc is supposed to be the last piece > in that several months long transition. ... which on the other hand

Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-12-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Charles Plessy and I uploaded r-bioc-* packages until level 11. Unfortunately building of some packages seems to be blocked for A: some pandoc dependency reason pandoc depends on missing: - pandoc-data:amd64 (< 2.17.1.1-3.~)

Bug#1054657: Transition issue for r-cran-rstanarm (Was: Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2)

2023-11-28 Thread Andreas Tille
resolved and for you to be able to start your transition within the > next few days. We don't want to start a big transition and have it > blocked on missing builds or installability issues on mips64el. Perfectly understandable. > On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 at 15:20, Andreas Tille wrote: >

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-11-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 09:22:18AM +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy: > would it be possible to have an estimation about when we can expect to > start the Bioconductor transition ? I am contributing to Debian mostly > on my work time and it would be super useful for me to have this > information in

Bug#1054657: Transition issue for r-cran-rstanarm (Was: Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2)

2023-11-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, Am Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 05:20:27PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > > The remaining regressions seen are caused by unrelated uploads of > > > r-cran-seurat/r-cran-seuratobject on 2023-11-01 and > > r-cran-seuratobject 5.0.1-1 has migrated to testing to

Bug#1054657: Transition issue for r-cran-rstanarm (Was: Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2)

2023-11-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, Am Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:20:38PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > Closing now because there's nothing to be done in rmatrix. > > > > The remaining regressions seen are caused by unrelated uploads of > > r-cran-seurat/r-cran-seuratobject on 2023-11-01 and r-c

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-11-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, Am Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:17:34AM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 20:46:17 +0100 Andreas Tille wrote: > > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > > > r-bioc-sparsearray is accepted in unstable. > > Well, Graham wrote "remove the 'moreinfo'

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-11-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo r-bioc-sparsearray is accepted in unstable. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: Matrix update triggering need for four rebuilds

2023-11-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:12:02AM -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: > Leaving > >r-cran-irlba >r-cran-openmx > > for you (unless you got to it already). To make it pretty clear: I will not simply rebuild these packages before we have a promising solution for the future. If you do not

Re: Matrix update triggering need for four rebuilds

2023-11-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 04:49:01PM -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: > > On 14 November 2023 at 16:17, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > | On 14 November 2023 at 11:06, Andreas Tille wrote: > | | Am Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 07:23:06AM -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuette

Re: Matrix update triggering need for four rebuilds

2023-11-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Dirk, Am Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 07:23:06AM -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: > Most of these are not in Debian but I think we need binary rebuilds of > >irlba because of headers >OpenMx because of headers, a new upstream 2.21.10 is out too >TMB

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-11-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 11:26:21PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > What about a compromise. We start the transition, r-bioc-s4arrays is in > ... Thanks to the hint from Charles I found that SparseArray is not new in Bioconductor and we can build the previous version with the current

Bug#1054657: r-bioc-sparsearray_1.0.12+dfsg-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2023-11-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi ftpmasters, we want to start the transition from Bioconductor version 3.17 to 3.18. The release team asked us to make sure there will be no packages missing in Debian that needs to pass new queue first to maintain some smooth transition. Thus I uploaded the only missing package

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-11-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, Am Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 08:39:18PM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers: > On 10-11-2023 11:56, Andreas Tille wrote: > > The only new dependency we need is SparseArray. However, we cannot > > upload the package to new since it needs r-bioc-s4arrays (>= 1.1.6) for > > buil

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-11-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi, Am Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 05:43:43PM +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy: > Hi Paul and everybody, I admit Paul's mail was convincing enough to dive deeper into this. I also need to admit that hacking together some scripts doing the job was less effort than I expected,

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-11-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Dirk, Am Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 12:28:22PM -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: > > "Kinda. Sorta. Not fully." I have written related code doing most of this > during the many attempt for 'turning CRAN into .deb packages'. > ... Sounds like another idea how this problem can be turned into code

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-11-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sebastian, Am Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 03:12:39PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > > Charles and I tried to explain in different ways: We do not have simple > > means to answer this question. > > Picking a random r-bioc-* package: >

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-11-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Dirk, Am Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 07:40:38AM -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: > > On 7 November 2023 at 22:01, Charles Plessy wrote: > | One possible direction would be to leverage the work done by Dirk and > | others in r2u, where the Bioc transition is over, and for each package > | in Debian,

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-11-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sebastian, Am Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 10:53:00AM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo I admit I'm not really happy about the bug ping-pong. > > I just finished inspecting by eye the homepage of each of the 69 new > > Bioconductor packages. None of them declare a

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-11-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Inggs: > > > Again, we are not asking for the entire transition to happen in > > > experimental. We are only asking for the NEW packages, so that NEW > > > processing happens before the transition, and not during. > > Le Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 11:28:38AM +0100,

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-11-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, Am Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 09:02:10AM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs: > > Sorry, my question was probably confusing. I was not talking about the > > new packages. I was talking about the 170 r-bioc-* packages. If I > > upload these to experimental, will it be necessary to upload these to >

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-10-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, Am Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 02:57:01PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs: > Hi Andreas > > On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 at 04:33, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Can you confirm that packages uploaded to experimental can be moved in > > one rush from experimental to unstable without extra

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-10-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, Am Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 04:55:24PM + schrieb Graham Inggs: > > Please remove the 'moreinfo' tag once all NEW packages needed for this > transition have been uploaded to experimental and have passed through > NEW review. Can you confirm that packages uploaded to experimental can

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-10-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 09:19:22AM -0500 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: > > | BioConductor has just released version 3.17. Since the next r-base > > Typo: 3.18 Yes. Thanks for pointing this out. > | release is pending on 2023-10-31 we do not think it is a good idea to > | start the transition

Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-10-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: r-bioc-biocgener...@packages.debian.org, debia...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-bioc-biocgenerics Hi, BioConductor has just released version 3.17. Since

Bug#1050223: RM: r-cran-rgdal/1.6-7+dfsg-1

2023-08-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Am Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 06:43:46PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers: > > Hi Andreas, > > rgdal will run out of upstream support soon. Since the package created > > failures with newer upstream versions of other packages (see bug > > #1049438) it should be removed from

Bug#1050223: RM: r-cran-rgdal/1.6-7+dfsg-1

2023-08-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-rg...@packages.debian.org, 1049...@bugs.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-rgdal Hi, as per upstream

Bug#1040498: Should we consider the transition ready (Was: Bug#1040498: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-08-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, Am Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:23:00PM + schrieb Graham Inggs: > tracker.d.o. is having some issues (see #1043546), but you can still > access up-to-date excuses here: > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-bioc-biocgenerics > > The current blocker I see is: > Implicit

Bug#1040498: Should we consider the transition ready (Was: Bug#1040498: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-08-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, the last new precondition was accepted so all r-bioc-* packages are uploaded and built meanwhile. The only not-transitioned package is r-bioc-bitseq where I filed a removal bug for[1]. So we have at least all r-bioc-* packages in their current version. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1049359

Bug#1040498: Should we consider the transition ready (Was: Bug#1040498: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-07-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, Am Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 07:44:32PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers: > > Well, I didn't check everything yet (hint is at [1]) Thanks for the hint - this was the point I wanted to make with my mail. > but at least the > autopkgtest regression in r-bioc-rhdf5filters (see [2] to find that in >

Bug#1040498: Should we consider the transition ready (Was: Bug#1040498: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

2023-07-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, all r-bioc-* packages except r-bioc-bitseq which is not maintained upstream and should probably be removed (as in the last transition) and r-bioc-scater r-bioc-deseq r-bioc-isoformswitchanalyzer are uploaded. The latter three have new dependencies which are uploaded to new.

Bug#1040498: Please give preference to this package (Was: r-bioc-densvis_1.10.2+dfsg-1_amd64.changes is NEW)

2023-07-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi ftpmasters, this package is needed to complete the Transitions r-api-bioc-3.17[1] since it is a new dependency of package r-bioc-scater. Thanks a lot in advance for processing this package quickly Andreas. [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/r-api-bioc-3.17.html Am Thu, Jul

Bug#1040498: Transition blocked by new package

2023-07-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: block -1 by 1042368 -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#1040498: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics - blocked by new package r-bioc-s4arrays

2023-07-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: block -1 by 1041598 Hi, it has turned out that there is a new dependency for the new version of package r-bioc-delayedarray. The new package r-bioc-s4arrays is uploaded to new but I record the ITP bug here as a blocker to record that issue. Usually ftpmaster is helpful and quick in

Bug#1040498: Help for Bioconductor transition needed: using Debian packaged libraries in r-bioc-rhdf5filters

2023-07-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I've just pushed r-bioc-rhdf5filters to salsa[1]. We are replacing code copies of several compression related libs by the Debian equivalents. Seems upstream added zstd and thus I added libzstd-dev to Build-Depends and tried to fix the according patch. But it went more complex. The issues

Bug#1040498: Fwd: Bug#1040498: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-07-17 Thread Andreas Tille
regards Andreas. Am Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 04:08:53PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi, > > the BioC transition can be started now. I'm kind of offline-ish for a > couple of hours today and a bit tired. May be I'll start tomorrow. For > those who do not want to wait fee

Bug#1040001: Role of tibble? (Was: Bug#1040001: Seeking advise how to proceed with the transition / move R stack to testing)

2023-07-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 10:35:17PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers: > Indeed, I think the pattern is that if we test in testing, with r-cran from > unstable and r-cran-tibble from testing it fails, but with r-cran from > unstable and r-cran-tibble from unstable, it works. > > I'm working my through the

Bug#1040001: adds unnecessarily strict versioned Depends on r-base-core

2023-07-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: reopen -1 Thanks for watching me, Bas. Am Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 05:09:31PM +0200 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg: > It seems that dh-r (20230707) should have closed #1040515 instead of the > transition bug report (#1040001). -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#1040001: Seeking advise how to proceed with the transition / move R stack to testing (Was: Bug#1040001: transition: r-base)

2023-07-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 12:52:49AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > > Andreas, if you remember, the code pointed out by Sébastien is > the exact same reason we had to t-p-u r-cran-shiny during freeze, See > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035428#15 >

Bug#1040001: To strict version restrictions injected by dh-r (Was: Bug#1040001: Seeking advise how to proceed with the transition / move R stack to testing)

2023-07-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sébastien, Am Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 09:13:46PM +0200 schrieb Sébastien Villemot: > > I'm not sure so please explain in more detail. dh-r was designed to put > > the lowest restriction regarding the versions. I remember some > > discussion some time ago that Dirk thought we should put stronger

Bug#1040001: Role of tibble? (Was: Bug#1040001: Seeking advise how to proceed with the transition / move R stack to testing)

2023-07-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 08:28:45PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers: > On 06-07-2023 19:08, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Yes, we'll take care of that where it looks sane to do so (examples of > > that are r-cran-epi); I'll manually schedule the "combined" tests, such > > that they disappear from the

Bug#1040001: Seeking advise how to proceed with the transition / move R stack to testing (Was: Bug#1040001: transition: r-base)

2023-07-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, Am Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 07:08:04PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers: > Yes, we'll take care of that where it looks sane to do so (examples of that > are r-cran-epi); I'll manually schedule the "combined" tests, such that they > disappear from the excuses if they then pass. OK. Thanks a lot

Bug#1040498: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics

2023-07-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: r-bioc-biocgener...@packages.debian.org, debia...@bugs.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-bioc-biocgenerics Hi, BioConductor has released version 3.17 when we were in

Bug#1040001: Seeking advise how to proceed with the transition / move R stack to testing (Was: Bug#1040001: transition: r-base)

2023-07-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, Am Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 09:56:31AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > I've now re-uploaded all 6 packages that are known to be affected by the > graphics ABI change (and verified that it is set properly). I'll > continue now closing the open bugs. After rebuilding quite s

Bug#1040001: transition: r-base

2023-07-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:07:12PM + schrieb Graham Inggs: > I don't think it's possible to set up a tracker for this first > "transition", as no packages currently depend on r-graphics-engine-*. Right, this makes perfectly sense. > Please wait until r-base and dh-r are built and in

Bug#1040001: transition: r-base

2023-07-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, the just uploaded r-base 4.3.1-2 implements r-graphics-engine-* which is respected by dh-r 20230705 (also just uploaded). It would be great if you could setup transition tracker. Am I understanding things correctly that I can now start uploading those r-cran-* packages featuring bugs

Bug#1040001: Add block by

2023-07-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: block -1 by 1040038

Bug#1040001: transition: r-base

2023-07-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, Am Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 10:54:03AM +0800 schrieb Paul Wise: >    $ objdump -T debian/*/usr/lib/R/site-library/*/libs/*.so | grep > R_GE_checkVersionOrDie >      DF *UND*     Base    > R_GE_checkVersionOrDie Thanks for the hint. Its

Bug#1040001: transition: r-base

2023-07-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, Am Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 05:24:19PM + schrieb Graham Inggs: > On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 at 19:57, Andreas Tille wrote: > > 45 > > > > serious bugs that are all caused by the non-transition while we should > > have done one. That's pretty annoying fo

Bug#1040001: transition: r-base

2023-07-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, Am Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 05:21:16PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers: > > So per upstream ("R Core" for short), this is clearly on the package > > side. There is no ABI/API incompatibility: R offers graphics functions new > > functionality, to use it one needs a rebuild _if a package decides to

Bug#1040001: transition: r-base

2023-07-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, just a status update: Am Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 01:45:11PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > I think my piece is ready. We just need to decide about a proper name > of the virtual package. I'll inject this into my proof of concept > change of dh-r. Than Dirk needs to uplo

Bug#1040001: transition: r-base

2023-07-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, Am Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 07:48:16AM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers: > Anytime is good to ask for a transition, particularly when the transition is > already ongoing. :-) > I don't think it should surprise anyone that we prefer it to be done right. > Our preference is for option 1. Thanks

Bug#1040001: transition: r-base

2023-06-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: r-b...@packages.debian.org, debia...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-base Hi, I'm not sure that we are in the right status to ask for a transition bug since

Seems we need a transition for r-base instead of lots of single bugs against single packages (Was: Bug#1039645: r-cran-epi: autopkgtest failure with r-base (4.3.1-1))

2023-06-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bas, (this is just an example bug out of a lot you filed) Am Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 08:11:05AM +0200 schrieb Bas Couwenberg: > 189s DLL requires the use of native symbols I wonder, whether all those bugs against single r-* packages are sensible. As far as I can see we simply need a

Bug#1028132: now ready

2023-06-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 06:31:28AM +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > > Andreas, you can upload r-cran-hunspell. Uploaded. Thanks a lot for the ping Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#1036753: unblock: debian-science/1.14.5

2023-05-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-scie...@packages.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:debian-science Please unblock package debian-science [ Reason ] This is the

Bug#1036227: bookworm-pu: package r-cran-shiny/1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1

2023-05-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, Am Tue, May 23, 2023 at 01:52:38PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers: > Control: tags -1 confirmed Thanks. > On 17-05-2023 19:48, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I'd like to announce an upload to testing-proposed-updates > > You confused me here. I don't see traces of the uploa

Bug#1036557: unblock: debian-med/3.8.1

2023-05-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@packages.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:debian-med Please unblock package debian-med [ Reason ] This is the final update of the

Bug#1036227: bookworm-pu: package r-cran-shiny/1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1

2023-05-17 Thread Andreas Tille
iny (1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium + + * Upload to testing-proposed-updates "bookworm" due to the fact that +there was an accidental upload of a new version of r-base to unstable + + -- Andreas Tille Wed, 17 May 2023 07:56:25 +0200 + r-cran-shiny (1.7.4+dfsg-3) unst

Re: Test suite issues due to new upstream version of r-core in unstable (Was: r-cran-shiny: broken symlink: ...)

2023-05-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Wed, May 17, 2023 at 02:07:22PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:58:58AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I hope I was following developers reference about t-p-u[6] correctly > > and pushed > > I've choosen the version 1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1 to matc

Re: Test suite issues due to new upstream version of r-core in unstable (Was: r-cran-shiny: broken symlink: ...)

2023-05-17 Thread Andreas Tille
hangelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +r-cran-shiny (1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium + + * Upload to testing-proposed-updates "bookworm" due to the fact that +there was an accidental upload of a new version of r-base to unstable + + -- Andreas Tille Wed, 17 May 2023 07:56:

Re: Test suite issues due to new upstream version of r-core in unstable (Was: r-cran-shiny: broken symlink: ...)

2023-05-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:49:55PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:25:15PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > I personally prefer "1" over 2 as it is less noise (and effort). > > On second thoughts, I think sending it via testing-proposed-updates > would be a better thing to

Test suite issues due to new upstream version of r-core in unstable (Was: r-cran-shiny: broken symlink: ...)

2023-05-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, when fixing bug #1035428 I realised test suite issues with r-cran-thematic [1] -> Error in `svglite_(filename, bg, width, height, pointsize, standalone, always_valid)`: Graphics API version mismatch r-cran-treescape [2] r-cran-treespace [3] -> error is given if lambda is

Bug#1034288: RM: igdiscover/0.11-3

2023-04-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm X-Debbugs-Cc: igdisco...@packages.debian.org, 1032...@bugs.debian.org, steffen_moel...@gmx.de Control: affects -1 + src:igdiscover According to bug #1032975 the package is non-functional and

Bug#1033687: unblock: debian-pan/0.4

2023-03-30 Thread Andreas Tille
-frameworks-dev + + -- Andreas Tille Mon, 06 Mar 2023 12:01:06 +0100 + +debian-pan (0.4~exp) experimental; urgency=medium + + * Team upload. + + [ Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel ] + * updated the task. + + [ Andreas Tille ] + * Fix debian/copyright + * Standards-Version: 4.6.2 + + * start of automatic

Re: Upload of new upstream version before fix has migrated to testing (Was: Re: Bug#1032120: tiledb: uses atomic operations, but is not linked to libatomic)

2023-03-15 Thread Andreas Tille
[Release team in CC] Am Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 08:45:21AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > I am removing myself from the uploaders field/maintenance of tiledb-py. Feel > free to update it once tiledb is ready for migration. The repository > lives at python team namespace. I admit I'm strongly in

Re: Bug#1032545: r-cran-qpdf: FTBFS in testing: QPDF.hh:1569:36: error: ‘std::string_view’ has not been declared

2023-03-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 10:08:02PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > > What do you think? > > std::string_view was introduced in C++17, but r-cran-qpdf is building > with C++11. Have you tried bumping the C++ version? Ahhh, right. Thanks a lot for the hint. Just uploaded a fix. I guess I

Re: Bug#1032545: r-cran-qpdf: FTBFS in testing: QPDF.hh:1569:36: error: ‘std::string_view’ has not been declared

2023-03-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 09:30:38PM +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > > /usr/include/qpdf/QPDF.hh:1569:36: error: ‘std::string_view’ has not been > > declared > > 1569 | void linearizationWarning(std::string_view); > > |^~~ > > In file

Chain of Dependencies prevents closing RC bugs

2023-02-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, to fix #1030884 python-cogent: FTBFS (ImportError: cannot import name 'float' from 'numpy') and let it migrate to testing it needs to wait for #950598 python3-jupyter-sphinx: package relies on unavailable `ipywidgets.embed` module which in turn needs #896460 Please package

Re: Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, Am Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 02:28:37PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 11:43, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I was motivated for this patch by Diane's statement on the Debian Med > > matrix channel that dask and dask.distributed are interconnected. If >

Re: Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham Am Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50:41PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs: > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 00:16, Rebecca N. Palmer > wrote: > > The remaining autopkgtest failures blocking pandas are: > > - dipy/amd64 and snakemake/i386 look like random flakiness: please retry > > them. (I think DMs

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

2023-01-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:04:50AM +0100 schrieb Thomas Goirand: > > > #1023965 [src:pandas] pandas FTBFS with Python 3.11 as supported > > > version > > > #1024031 [src:numba] numba FTBFS with Python 3.11 as supported version > > I saw the above 2 were fixed. Fixed in the sense that

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

2023-01-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 09:05:21AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Thomas, > > Am Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 01:57:43PM +0100 schrieb Thomas Goirand: > > > > This has since already been discussed here: the final decision was to "at > > least try 3.11", which is e

Re: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 01:44:40PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs: > Hi Rebecca > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 10:30, Rebecca N. Palmer > wrote: > > Should this go ahead before the freeze? I think yes if the new dask > > works, but am open to disagreement. > > Please go ahead. With numpy 1:1.24.1-2

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

2023-01-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Thomas, Am Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 01:57:43PM +0100 schrieb Thomas Goirand: > > This has since already been discussed here: the final decision was to "at > least try 3.11", which is exactly what we're doing. I admit I was not at site and may be I missunderstood what was finally decided. From

Bug#1023731: BioC Packages are now clean (one exception with RC bug filed) (Was: Bug#1023731: Any idea why debci picks old versions)

2022-12-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 06:08:04PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > It did. Closing. Thanks a lot Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#1023731: BioC Packages are now clean (one exception with RC bug filed) (Was: Bug#1023731: Any idea why debci picks old versions)

2022-12-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 12:22:53PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > No, it's not. If you check the logs from r-bioc-htsfilter for example > (https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-htsfilter/28944996/log.gz), > you see that some packages have actual regressions: The log

Bug#1023731: BioC Packages are now clean (one exception with RC bug filed) (Was: Bug#1023731: Any idea why debci picks old versions)

2022-12-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 10:53:58PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > And there are many more. r-bioc-biocparallel is another one. This smells > like many insufficient dependencies. Sorry, this all seems to be the same britney failure Paul was reporting. The tests are all against the versions in

Bug#1023731: BioC Packages are now clean (one exception with RC bug filed) (Was: Bug#1023731: Any idea why debci picks old versions)

2022-12-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, Am Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 09:34:09PM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers: > On 29-11-2022 10:26, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Now there is only one remaining one which is a real > > problem which I have reported upstream (see bug #1025045). If > > r-bioc-structuralvariantannota

Bug#1023731: BioC Packages are now clean (one exception with RC bug filed) (Was: Bug#1023731: Any idea why debci picks old versions)

2022-11-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, Am Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 09:32:13PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > So you want to say, the fact that the current debci results that are > listed on the r-bioc-biocgenerics page are based on packages that are > replaced in unstable and the current packages that are fixed are not

Bug#1023731: Any idea why debci picks old versions (Was: Bug#1023731: BioC Transition blocked by new dependencies)

2022-11-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, Am Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 08:23:12PM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers: > > I'm constantly checking the tracker page of r-bioc-biocgenerics[1] to > > follow the transition status. I realised that debci picks old, not yet > > fixed package versions like: > > > >

Bug#1023731: Any idea why debci picks old versions (Was: Bug#1023731: BioC Transition blocked by new dependencies)

2022-11-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I'm constantly checking the tracker page of r-bioc-biocgenerics[1] to follow the transition status. I realised that debci picks old, not yet fixed package versions like: r-bioc-biocfilecache/2.4.0+dfsg-1 while 2.4.0+dfsg-2 is in unstable r-bioc-biocsingular/1.12.0+ds-1 while

  1   2   3   4   5   >