upload
before the freeze.
Also given that it is only some small game there should be no harm in
having one Debian release without it.
Bernhard R. Link
--
F8AC 04D5 0B9B 064B 3383 C3DA AFFC 96D1 151D FFDC
* Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org [141109 19:45]:
- keep the way it is which causes those packages generate uninstallable
packages if binnmu'd [2]
I forgot to mention that the smalles possible change to bring any
package that became uninstallable by binNMU back to working state
is a MU
to add some bin-nmu and affectedness detection (with the danger of
false positives) to debhelper to make thsoe packages fail to build
if binnmu'd so that no uninstallable packages are generated.
- change the affected packages in question to not use --link-doc.
Bernhard R. Link
[1] Or rather
. (I currently plan
to request removal from unstable once jessie released (preferable without
xfm)).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130615113313.ga2...@client.brlink.eu
guessed your interpretation. Which is why I suggest
to improve it.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130429173534.ga3
in a
way to forbid using 3.0 to add the first patch to a package.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130428183812.ga5
* Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net [130106 16:16]:
On 2013-01-01 10:28, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please consider pre-approving reprepro/4.12.5-1
(not yet uploaded, would go via
not affecting the Debian package.
unblock reprepro/4.12.5-1
Thanks in advance,
Bernhard R. Link
changelogs (debian and upstream):
ChangeLog | 21 +
NEWS |4
debian/changelog |9 -
Documentation:
docs/manual.html | 30
release in unstable. (Though if it is a
library, it might be nice to first request removal from testing, so
that noone wastes work on any of its reverse dependencies for this
release).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
a typo in the manpage.
Thanks in advance,
Bernhard R. Link
unblock reprepro/4.12.4-1
diff -r -u -N reprepro_4.12.3-1/debian/changelog
reprepro_4.12.4-1/debian/changelog
--- reprepro_4.12.3-1/debian/changelog 2012-06-24 23:13:38.0 +0200
+++ reprepro_4.12.4-1/debian/changelog
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)
+
+ -- Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org Sun, 01 Jul 2012 16:36:55 +0200
+
fracplanet (0.4.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
diff -r -u -N fracplanet_0.4.0-2/debian/rules fracplanet_0.4.0-3/debian/rules
--- fracplanet_0.4.0-2/debian/rules 2010-04-09 16:16
* Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de [120406 13:47]:
Bernhard R. Link dixit:
The effect you see is usually not from a unclean chroot, but from a
non-minimal chroot.
Non-minimal is unclean.
A unclean chroot is one with modifications that make it unsuiteable for
building packages. A package
.
As far as I can tell from a short testing, it seems to work.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120214115442.ga2
Package: libc6
Version: 2.11.3-2
Severity: important
The squeeze point release changed libc6's behaviour w.r.t. to name
servers not supporting queries.
It guess it gets confused if the dns server (in this case a local pdnsd
as the ISP supplied server does not answer to at all thus
* Jay Berkenbilt q...@debian.org [111229 17:26]:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
FWIW, I think it should be required for such a library to use versioned
symbols if it doesn't care to keep its ABI stable.
While I agree in principle, this is the first ABI change in the over 10
* Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org [110304 17:33]:
* Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org [110303 20:54]:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:36:34PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
I've prepared an upload of reprepro targeted for
stable-proposed-updates to work around testing and unstable
soon
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
UserTags: pu
* Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org [110303 20:54]:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:36:34PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
I've prepared an upload of reprepro targeted for
stable-proposed-updates to work around
for this to be accepted? Any modifications still
needed to get in?
Bernhard R. Link
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:16:03 CET
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.2.0-2squeeze1
Distribution: stable-proposed-updates
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl
* Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [101023 19:58]:
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 16:21 +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
- make it compile with gcc-4.5 (#600982)
by simple including a header more.
(gcc-4.5 is not in squeeze, but I guess it would still nice to
have things in a release
to current dpkg-source
- add support for ButAutomaticUpgrades (compare #600358)
(that is actually a feature addition, but should have not impact
on other stuff).
Bernhard R. Link
Following is the diff of the .debian.tar.gz files.
diff -r -u -N reprepro_4.2.0-1.debian.tar.gz/changelog
+0200
+++ git-dpm-0.2.1-1/debian/changelog2010-10-07 17:48:16.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+git-dpm (0.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * new bugfix release
+
+ -- Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:48:16 +0200
+
git-dpm (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* new
* Gunnar Wolf gw...@gwolf.org [100914 19:25]:
We have carried a major.minor scheme as a release numbering scheme
since the Early Days,
Actually, AFAIK since lenny we no longer use major.minor but
release.andhalf.point.
There just has not been any 5.1.0 (aka lenny-and-half).
Bernhard R
in reusing chroots anyway, so being able to check more
missing dependencies is an advantage while not being able to update
chroots no big disadvantage.
Bernhard R. Link
[1] Though our current handling of essential bloats chroots quite a bit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
).
Release team: Could you remove it from testing, please?
Thanks in advance,
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20100806150228.ga3
reprepro failed to build on kfreebsd-amd64 because libgpgme11-dev
contained a dir.gz file and was thus not installable, which no longer
is in 1.2.0-1.1.
dw reprepro_4.0.2-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 . -m 'libgpgme11-dev (= 1.2.0-1.1)'
Thanks in advance,
Bernhard R. Link
--
Never contain programs
for example in the
attachment)?
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
Asking for wanna-build actions on debian-release
Intro
-
Members of the release team have wanna-buildd access, and can perform
actions as needed
,
Bernhard R. Link
[1] from the build-dependencies only iceape-dev differs in unstable and
that looks like a a security update and I do not find any library
dependency in the resulting binary package caused by this build-dependency.
(as icedtea packages are only built in experimental).
diff -r
/jre/lib/amd64/motif21/libmawt.so
jftp gives an empty window without, and also fails with
Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Can't load library:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/amd64/motif21/libmawt.so
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
variable is set (as without any variable, it also
did not work in etch, so it is not that big a regression).
openjre maintainers, release team, any opinions on that?
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
diff --git a/jdk/src/solaris/classes/sun/awt/X11/XWM.java b/jdk/src/solaris/classes/sun
/changelog 2008-12-05 16:48:31.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+reprepro (3.5.2-6) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * backport bugfix from 3.6.3 to 3.5.2:
+ - fix sha256 hash calculation of verly large files (Closes: 506674)
+
+ -- Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:01:47 +0100
* Neil McGovern [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081110 12:27]:
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 05:02:53PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
Hi, I backported some changes from 3.6.2 (currently in experimental
to keep unstable open) to 3.5.2 (testing and unstable have 3.5.2-4).
Do they have a chance to get
and other errors in the manpage (Closes: 502531)
+ * backport forgotten fixes of 3.6.0:
+ - fix bashism in bzip.example (Closes: 489652)
+
+ -- Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:58:14 +0100
+
reprepro (3.5.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
* change to use libdb4.6 (Closes
mistake, please ignore my angry reply and
tell me that I can switch severity back till lenny release...
Thanks in advance,
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080909 23:13]:
Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear release team: Could that get an freeze exception (it could go via
unstable) or would it need any changes?
It's OK, please ping us again when the upload happened, so that we can
'
+in full-screen mode (Closes: 479467)
+ * fix ps encoding error on 64-bit architectures (Closes: 444648, 482029)
+
+ -- Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:56:17 +0200
+
xpdf (3.02-1.3) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload by testing security team.
diff -u
; urgency=low
+
+ * backport some bugfixes of 3.6.1 to 3.5.2:
+ - readd Ctrl-C support to file database operations
+ - fix reoverride command (LP: 206663)
+ - fix error in handling libbz2 return codes
+
+ -- Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:55:46 +0200
+
reprepro (3.5.2-2
* Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080807 02:06]:
* Adeodato Simó [Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:04:28 +0100]:
Yes, please upload.
(And mail again when done, please.)
Thx. I have uploaded it.
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
--
Never contain programs so few bugs, as when no debugging tools
+1,12 @@
+reprepro (3.5.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * backport some bugfixes of 3.6.0 to 3.5.2:
+ - no longer double-free with --export=never
+ - no longer trigger assert() in wrong argument of list arguments
+ - no longer trigger assert() in restorefiler
+
+ -- Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL
.
If there is anything I can or should do, please let me know...
Thanks in advance,
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
40 matches
Mail list logo
