Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hello.
I've been confused about #845833 because I was sure I had fixed it. I checked
in git and I had, and now I'm confused about what git version I actually
uploaded.
I'd like to fix that RC
sad for this but I'll deal with it. Shame I haven't had time
earlier.
I have uploaded it to experimental. What is the point of filing a
transition bug now, if it has to wait for several months before being
considered?
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org
++,
metview, pygrib
Maintained by Youhei SASAKI: ruby-grib
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-08 Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
experimental bit that isn't actually packaged. However, it may still
make sense to binNMU it in case the new grib_api causes issues during
the build.
Once the list is confirmed, I think we are ready.
Confirmed.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I have packaged the new version of grib-api and I'm ready to upload it.
Upstream still doesn't want to worry about ABI compatibility and still
embeds the full package version in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu grib-api_1.9.16-2 . ALL . -m Rebuilt with the default gfortran. Closes:
#695727
When fortran compilers build a library, they generate a .mod file that
is a kind of header file. The
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
(please explain about the transition: impacted packages, reason, ...)
Dear Release team,
some time ago I have uploaded version 1.9.16 of grib_api to sid.
Since upstream has chosen to
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-08 Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of a symlink. The shellscript being nothing
more than:
#!/bin/sh
test -d ~/.foxtrotgps || ln -s ~/.tangogps ~/.foxtrotgps
exec foxtrotgps
What do you think?
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
that, though.
The 'do what the other distros are doing' is also a nice default (but
then again I'm now at
http://distributions.freedesktop.org/wiki/Meetings/AppInstaller2011
so today I'm biased :)
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org
signature.asc
config
* Fixed DeprecationWarning in set_sort_by_value. Closes: #601880.
* Reset cached sort value if --sort is not provided for search.
Closes: #601881.
-- Enrico Zini enr...@debian.org Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:25:07 +
A mini feature crept in as part of the fix to #601880, I hope you don't
(config.h)
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign])
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 05cec5b..6759936 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+debtags (1.7.11) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Update /var/lib/debtags/package-tags. Closes: #602634.
+
+ -- Enrico
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package fuss-launcher
fuss-launcher (0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Port to new Xapian API. Closes: #601760
-- Enrico Zini enr...@debian.org Fri, 29 Oct 2010
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package omhacks: it fixes #601321.
unblock omhacks/0.11-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package libept
It fixes #601417.
unblock libept/1.0.4
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
sense to have this fix in squeeze.
apt-xapian-index (0.40) unstable; urgency=low
* Xapian cache moved to /var/cache/apt-xapian-index. Closes: #594675.
-- Enrico Zini enr...@debian.org Sun, 03 Oct 2010 11:39:28 +0100
unblock apt-xapian-index/0.40
Ciao,
Enrico
-- System Information
an int, not a float
+
+ -- Enrico Zini enr...@debian.org Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:23:00 +0200
+
cfget (0.16-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version
diff -Nru cfget-0.16/PKG-INFO cfget-0.17/PKG-INFO
--- cfget-0.16/PKG-INFO 2010-07-16 10:53:07.0 +0200
+++ cfget-0.17/PKG-INFO 2010-08-26
and the release managers deciding which ones are worth making official,
which would be quite a burden to them.
Are there ways to set up such a thing so that it mostly manages itself?
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Enrico Zini enr...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
). On the other hand, 0.13 has bigger problems
(#509819).
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini enr...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 02:51:54PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
unblocked.
Thanks.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:46:48PM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
In the future we can see about packaging the vocabulary as a binary-all
package, so that if needed we can upload an updated vocabulary shortly
Hello,
there seems to be a new version of apt in unstable that requires a
binNMU of debtags, debtags-edit, libept and packagesearch.
Probably also goplay.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
maintained and a very useful piece of software, I expect there will be
even more in the future.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of the build-deps in the .dsc shows up on a record an take
the appropriate action.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
transitions, then have dput fetch it and print a warning in case one is
going to upload a package that would step in someone's feet?
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:25:44PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
- compute a delicateness index of a package by summing the SAT
temperature of all packages that depend on it, and then give special
attention to the most delicate packages to see RC bugs, maintainer
activity and so
2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
and just keep it in unstable.
Packages involved are dballe, libdballe-dev, libdballe2, libdballef2.
There are no other packages that depend on it.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
libcnf-dev 4.0-2) into etch.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 04:10:06PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Enrico Zini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061220 10:15]:
I've uploaded a new cnf to unstable that builds a .a library with -fPIC
code. It's a very simple packaging change that just adds -fPIC to the
CFLAGS.
Your change looks
,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
it. If that is not
acceptable, either someone offers to comaintain and builds and uploads
the packages properly, or I'll be happy to orphan my packages and do the
happy upstream.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the packages. Maybe I have some stray library hanging
around...
Thanks for taking care of this.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:41:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
So, it seems that there are some recompiles to be triggered:
Step 1: libtagcoll-dev
Step 2: tagcoll, tagcolledit, libapt-front-dev
(since they statically
, packagesearch
(since they statically link libapt-front-dev)
Thanks,
Enrico
Thanks also to azeem and peterS who helped me figuring some details of
the course of action to follow.
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(s) as this may turn out to become an ugly
Sarge issue.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
41 matches
Mail list logo
