:56.0 -0500
+++ nheko-0.11.3/debian/changelog 2023-03-23 12:17:45.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+nheko (0.11.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/control: Downgrade gstreamer1.0-vaapi to a Suggests.
+
+ -- Hubert Chathi Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:17:45 -0400
+
nheko (0.11.3-1) unstable
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
reason: new upstream release
two packages affected:
- neochat: nearly builds as-is. Only needed change is to disable
running the tests, because the tests require a display. (The
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:17:56 +0200, Paul Gevers said:
> Hi,
> On 16-04-2021 00:07, Hubert Chathi wrote:
>> Again, this needs to go through tpu since sid has a newer version
> Please read our FAQ [1]. We prefer you revert the newer version and
> prepare a targeted fix in unsta
6a6
Author: Hubert Chathi
Date: Thu Apr 15 17:45:24 2021 -0400
apply upstream patch to not use tweeny
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 3530c57f..b46c707c 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+nheko (0.7.2-3+deb11u1) bullseye; urge
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
It looks like there was a bug in libfmt which caused its dependent
packages to be lacking a "Depends: libfmt7". Rebuilding against the
latest libfmt-dev fixes this. So I'm requesting to
Can someone schedule a binnmu of nheko? Apparently it needs to be
rebuilt because it compiles its QML files, and so is incompatible with
the latest version. Running nheko gives the error:
qrc:/qml/TimelineView.qml: File was compiled ahead of time with an
incompatible version of Qt and the
by always
> including the changes you want us to consider (modulo filterdiff of
> auto-generated files).
Noted. I wasn't sure about the process, but will do so in the future.
For reference, here is the complete debdiff.
--
Hubert Chathi -- https://www.uhoreg.ca/
Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca -- Mat
02-08 15:35:59.0 -0500
+++ nheko-0.6.3/debian/changelog 2019-04-08 18:00:01.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+nheko (0.6.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Support v3 rooms (Closes: #926671)
+
+ -- Hubert Chathi Mon, 08 Apr 2019 18:00:01 -0400
+
nheko (0.6.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* N
-
- * dcraw.cc: Apply patch from
-https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1027072action=diff to
-prevent buffer overflow in ljpeg_start (Closes: #786783, CVE-2015-3885)
-
- -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org Tue, 26 May 2015 14:44:00 -0400
-
ufraw (0.20-2) unstable; urgency=low
* ufraw
://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1027072action=diff to
-prevent buffer overflow in ljpeg_start (Closes: #786783, CVE-2015-3885)
-
- -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org Tue, 26 May 2015 14:44:00 -0400
-
ufraw (0.20-2) unstable; urgency=low
* ufraw-gimp.c: Apply upstream patch: Only
tags 781529 - moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 07:41:56 +0100, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk said:
Please go ahead, and remove the moreinfo tag once the package is in
unstable.
Done. (Hopefully I did that right.)
Thanks
--
Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub
/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+noweb (2.11b-9) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/patches/99_touch.dpatch: Add src/shell/noweave to the list of
touched
+files. (Closes: #781099)
+
+ -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org Fri, 27 Mar 2015 22:06:25 -0400
+
noweb (2.11b-8) unstable; urgency=low
-gimp.c: Apply upstream patch: Only use
+gimp_register_magic_load_handler() with Gimp 2.9+.
+
http://ufraw.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ufraw/ufraw/ufraw-gimp.c?r1=1.82r2=1.83
+(Closes: #772102)
+
+ -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org Fri, 05 Dec 2014 10:23:28 -0500
+
ufraw (0.20-1
). That would probably be easier
than having to install 2.2 via a non-deb method. And you could add a
preinst script in the 2.5 package that would abort the upgrade if the
user tries to upgrade from 1.9.
--
Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
for reference card. (Closes: #684417)
+
+ -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:49:01 -0400
+
asymptote (2.15-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Imported Upstream version 2.15
diff -Nru asymptote-2.15/debian/copyright asymptote-2.15/debian/copyright
--- asymptote-2.15/debian/copyright
On Fri, 22 May 2009 14:41:39 +0200 Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es
wrote:
+ Yavor Doganov (Fri, 15 May 2009 11:22:24 +):
В Sat, 02 May 2009 20:32:22 -0400, Hubert Chathi написа:
Has new upstream version -- will upload shortly, no bin-NMU
needed:
- gnustep-dl2
- gorm.app
-- will upload shortly, no bin-NMU needed:
- gnustep-dl2
- gorm.app
- gworkspace
- price.app
--
Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
further delays, sure.
Everything is ready, pending Hubert's approval (as maintainer of the
package). If he's overloaded I'd resort to -mentors, but I won't do
that unless there's a specific ACK from him.
Uploaded. Thanks, Yavor, for your work.
--
Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber
while lynkeos.app
sorts itself out.
I have uploded gnustep-base, -gui, and -back to experimental for now. I
have uploaded gnustep-make to unstable because it doesn't
introduce/remove any packages.
--
Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
libraries breaks when used against the current set of packages in
testing and unstable?
I'm already stretched pretty thin as it is, so if someone on the
GNUstep team could try that, it would be very much appreciated.
--
Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D
be downloaded from:
http://debian.uhoreg.ca/experimental/gnustep/
(apt-gettable)
--
Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
pgpSLCp1KWMWg.pgp
mentioned (eventually split into several bugs).
But the patch for this issue can be found in this message:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496677#123
Thanks
--
Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca
Hi release team,
Can someone tell me why noweb isn't migrating to testing? The excuses
page says that noweb depends on icon, but icon is in testing, and the
dependency isn't a versioned dependency. Is it because icon isn't
built on armel or m68k in testing?
Thanks
--
Hubert Chathi [EMAIL
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:57:32 +0200 Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hubert Chathi wrote:
Can someone tell me why noweb isn't migrating to testing? The
excuses page says that noweb depends on icon, but icon is in
testing, and the dependency isn't a versioned dependency. Is it
because
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:27:57 +0100 Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* Hubert Chathi [Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:35:20 -0400]:
How is that? noweb just depends on gawk, iconx, and libc6, and the
dependency on iconx is unversioned, so shouldn't it be satisfied
with the version of icon
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:11:22 -0400, Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hello, release team, It looks like the core GNUstep libraries have
been built on all architectures. Can you please schedule binNMUs for
the following packages:
[...]
- gnustep-dl2
Short story: I have NMUed gnustep-dl2
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:51:22 +0200, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hubert Chathi wrote:
It looks like the core GNUstep libraries have been built on all
architectures. Can you please schedule binNMUs for the following
packages:
Not all uploaded for hppa and ia64 yet, though we can start
--
Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Can someone from the release team please respond?
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:11:55 -0400, Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:37:22 -0700, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 08:09:39PM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
Please let us know if we can go
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:37:22 -0700, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 08:09:39PM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
Please let us know if we can go ahead with planning a transition, or
what steps we should be taking. We already have a fairly recent
version of gnustep
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:37:22 -0700, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 08:09:39PM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
Anyone from the release team want to comment on whether we will be
allowed to move forward with this transition?
For my part, I was reserving comment
Anyone from the release team want to comment on whether we will be
allowed to move forward with this transition?
(P.S.: please Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
replies.)
On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:24:27 -0400, Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hello, release team, Due to licensing issues, we have been
to be transitioned via binNMUs.
--
Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
pgpXQg6tP7SOg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, with no Internet access, for the next few days, but I
will answer your questions when I get back.
--
Hubert Chathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
34 matches
Mail list logo
