grub 2.12-2 and 2.12-2~deb13u1 unstable/testing security updates [CVE-2024-2312]

2024-04-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Hi, I just uploaded grub2 2.12-2 and 2.12-2~deb13u1 to unstable and testing-proposed-updates respectively. These have been pending for a couple weeks now but we got a bit distracted by the time_t stuff (which is also the reason for the t-p-u upload so this doesn't get stuck). These fix a

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Hey Steve, On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 07:38:42PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 09:25:52AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Hi, > > > Am 06.01.24 um 06:51 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > > > > - dpkg will be uploaded to experimental with 64-bit time_t in the > > > > > default

Re: Bug#1040901: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages

2023-10-27 Thread Julian Andres Klode
OK, it seems my original email got lost somewhere in tech hickups, it's possible the kernel crashed before sending the email, AMD just crashes once or twice a day. So I'm writing this email a bit in a hurry, so it's not quite as thought out as the last one weeks ago, but yesterday's email was

Re: signing and releasing grub2 testing-proposed-updates

2023-10-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 09:21:32PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 10-10-2023 21:00, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > That's bug #983912 and I can't tell you what to do, but yes, generally > > grub2 should go before grub-efi-*. > > During the migration run, would

Re: signing and releasing grub2 testing-proposed-updates

2023-10-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 08:38:56PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 10-10-2023 18:59, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > It seems the binaries built but I guess someone needs to poke the > > signing bits and once they are built they can all be released > > I was ho

signing and releasing grub2 testing-proposed-updates

2023-10-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Hi release and ftp folks, I uploaded grub2 2.06-13+deb13u1 (same as stable except changelog header) to testing-proposed-updates as proposed by elbrus; since we are still waiting for the XFS bug to be resolved. It seems the binaries built but I guess someone needs to poke the signing bits and

Bug#1053151: unblock: apt/2.7.6

2023-09-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 11:32:26AM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 11:22:44AM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertag

Bug#1053151: unblock: apt/2.7.6

2023-09-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 11:22:44AM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@packages.debian.org, j...@debian.org, > debian-c...@lists.debian.org >

Bug#1053151: unblock: apt/2.7.6

2023-09-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@packages.debian.org, j...@debian.org, debian-c...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:apt Please unblock package apt (well remove the sramacher block) apt 2.7.5

apt-sign signing keys considerations

2023-08-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
(links with further content at the end) Hi ftp, security, and release teams, as far as I am aware each of you is currently maintaining some sort of OpenPGP signing key for apt repositories. As part of my apt-sign work, I'd like to gather some knowledge as to what are the needs for signing keys

Bug#1036762: unblock: apt/2.6.1

2023-05-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
egressions to late in the bookworm cycle. To keep +upgrade paths (which will have adduser installed) the same, we drop +the base-password alternative rather than requiring both dependencies, +as that could change resolving or ordering bugs. (Closes: #1035654) + * Point gitlab-ci and gbp to b

Re: non-essential adduser poses problems to purging packages

2023-05-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Sorry for posting from phone. I hope it's not too unreadable. I'm a bit ill from travel. Sebastian Ramacher schrieb am So., 7. Mai 2023, 10:50: > Source: apt > Version: 2.5.4 > Severity: serious > > On 2023-05-04 11:17:50 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > Hi release team, > > > > Andreas Beckmann

Bug#1032910: unblock: apt/2.6.0

2023-03-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
. [ Miroslav Kure ] * Czech program translation update (Closes: #1031008) . [ Bastian Germann ] * machine-readable version of COPYING (Closes: #1019273), initial version . [ Julian Andres Klode ] * Update lintian override info format in d/apt.lintian-overrides * Further work

Bug#990988: unblock: networkd-dispatcher/2.1-2

2021-07-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
ncy=medium + + [ Lukas Märdian ] + * Add d/p/0003-Normalize-parsed-IP-address-value.patch to handle IP address +networkctl output of systemd v244+ + + [ Julian Andres Klode ] + * debian/gbp.conf: Point to debian/bullseye + + -- Julian Andres Klode Mon, 12 Jul 2021 12:56:03 +0200 + networkd-

Bug#990670: [pre-approval] unblock: python-apt/2.2.1

2021-07-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Sun, Jul 04, 2021 at 09:27:35PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo > > On 2021-07-04 14:25:00 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.deb

Bug#990670: [pre-approval] unblock: python-apt/2.2.1

2021-07-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org Please unblock package python-apt [ Reason ] - Mark python-apt-common as Multi-Arch: common to unblock the crossgrader script (#968458). People have very

Bug#988662: unblock: apt/2.2.4

2021-06-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Control: retitle -1 unlock: apt/2.2.4 Control: tag -1 - moreinfo On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 07:46:19PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 10:09:44PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > Hi Julian, > > > > So

Bug#988662: [pre-approval] unblock: apt/2.2.4

2021-06-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 10:09:44PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Julian, > > Sorry it took so long to reply; pre-approvals are regularly awkward. > > On Mon, 17 May 2021 17:07:08 +0200 Julian Andres Klode > wrote: > > Please un

Bug#988662: [pre-approval] unblock: apt/2.2.4

2021-05-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 05:07:08PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > [ Risks ] > > 1/2 The risk potential for the JSON hooks is restricted to the JSON > hooks themselves, and we don't ship any in the archive atm, nor does > stable have them, so users can't be regressed really. A

Bug#988662: [pre-approval] unblock: apt/2.2.4

2021-05-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
th TCP and enables Acquire::Retries + * policy: Apply phasing to uninstalled packages too (LP: #1925745), +this prevents inconsistencies when installing new binaries that depend +on the same version of an already installed binary. + + -- Julian Andres Klode Mon, 17 May 2021 16:20:59 +0200 +

Bug#987015: [pre-approval] unblock: python-apt/2.2.0

2021-04-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
ControL: tag -1 - moreinfo On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:32:07AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > tags -1 confirmed moreinfo > > Hi Julian, > > On 15-04-2021 18:28, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Want to bump version number to stable series versioning, mostly, > > update

Bug#987210: buster-pu: package apt/1.8.2.3

2021-04-19 Thread Julian Andres Klode
nt $Dpkg::DATADIR;" diff -Nru apt-1.8.2.2/debian/changelog apt-1.8.2.3/debian/changelog --- apt-1.8.2.2/debian/changelog 2020-12-07 12:31:04.0 +0100 +++ apt-1.8.2.3/debian/changelog 2021-04-19 18:41:13.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +apt (1.8.2.3) buster; urgency=medium + + * Default Acquire

Re: Bug#931566: Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true")

2021-04-19 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 06:31:48PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Can we defer these until after the AllowReleaseInfoChange change is > out, please? Done. I uploaded 1.8.2.3 with that one change as requested, and created a pu bug for it. -- debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free

Re: Bug#931566: Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true")

2021-04-19 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 06:08:23PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 06:01:18PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > I see. Nobody pinged me since then, but it is indeed fixed in the > > 1.8.5 stable update that at least one release team member was >

Re: Bug#931566: Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true")

2021-04-19 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 05:40:09PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Julian Andres Klode > > > We're getting close to the release of bullseye and it has been brought > > > to my attention that this bug is still unfixed in buster. Once we > > > release bullseye,

Bug#986899: [pre-approval] unblock: apt/2.2.3

2021-04-19 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 08:32:52PM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo > > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:46:57PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > [ Reason ] > > > > Fix downloading packages

Re: Bug#931566: Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true")

2021-04-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 10:20:19PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Julian, David, SRM, > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 09:11:48 +0200 Christoph Berg wrote: > > Fwiw, I think this needs fixing in buster, not just in unstable. > > We're getting close to the release of bullseye and it has been brought > to

Bug#987015: [pre-approval] unblock: python-apt/2.2.0

2021-04-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 06:54:32PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 06:28:49PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > &

Bug#987015: [pre-approval] unblock: python-apt/2.2.0

2021-04-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Please look at the second email in the bug, it's attached there. (Sorry for layout, writing this on phone) Sebastian Ramacher schrieb am Fr., 16. Apr. 2021, 14:16: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2021-04-15 18:28:49 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Package: rel

Bug#987015: [pre-approval] unblock: python-apt/2.2.0

2021-04-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org Please unblock package python-apt [ Reason ] Want to bump version number to stable series versioning, mostly, update the mirror list, and remove invalid PIE

Bug#985045: unblock: apt/2.2.2

2021-03-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
ty pdiff patches +- Rename pdiff merge patches only after they are all downloaded + - Start pdiff patching from the last possible starting point +- Ensure all index files sent custom tags to the methods + * Harden test for no new acquires after transaction abort (Closes: #984966) + +

Bug#984428: release.debian.org: add list of (future) codenames

2021-03-03 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 06:39:50PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 3/3/21 6:32 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > I never have any idea what the codenames are, I know they are in a > > release team announcement somewhere, but it would be great to just have > > a list

Bug#984428: release.debian.org: add list of (future) codenames

2021-03-03 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org I never have any idea what the codenames are, I know they are in a release team announcement somewhere, but it would be great to just have a list on release.debian.org, of future codenames, and maybe a couple old ones

Re: Optional Build-Depends

2020-07-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 06:56:56PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 07:27:52PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > ... > > >Rationales: > > > > > >1. You can start optionally build-depending on stuff available > > only

Re: Optional Build-Depends

2020-07-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 07:27:52PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Not liked proposals: > > Build-Depends-Optional field - it would just be ignored by tools, > silently, and we'd find about it onyl when it is too late. > > Build-Recommends field - same as

Optional Build-Depends

2020-07-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Hi, we were just talking in #debian-dpkg about optional build-deps. guillem believes that the release team is in the best position to specify if this is reasonable or not, so here we go: We have came up with a syntax, one goal being to break parsers and not silently ignore optional deps:

Re: apt autopkgtest regressed in stable with 1.8.2.1

2020-06-01 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 06:59:48PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Julian, security team, > > This is a warning that the autopkgtest of apt in stable regressed [1] > with the upload of 1.8.2.1. Looking at the error message, it seems > related with the latest change. I'm well aware of that, and a

Bug#953312: transition: apt

2020-03-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 09:16:02PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 07/03/2020 13:55, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Us

Bug#953312: transition: apt

2020-03-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > A new APT is coming. Most stuff just is going to need binNMUs, except for the &g

Bug#953312: transition: apt

2020-03-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition A new APT is coming. Most stuff just is going to need binNMUs, except for the one on:

Bug#934300: buster-pu: package apt/1.8.3~deb10u1

2019-08-09 Thread Julian Andres Klode
1,3 +1,13 @@ +apt (1.8.3) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Simon Körner ] + * http: Fix Host header in proxied https connections (LP: #1838771) + + [ Brian Murray ] + * Do not include squashfs file systems in df output. (LP: #1756595) + + -- Julian Andres Klode Fri, 09 Aug 2019 11:16:15 +0200 + a

Re: Dropping Release and Release.gpg support from APT

2019-07-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:10:41AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 2019-07-10 10:04, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:35:25AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > >

Dropping Release and Release.gpg support from APT

2019-07-09 Thread Julian Andres Klode
So, we currently have code dealing with falling back from InRelease to Release{,.gpg} and it's all a bit much IMO. Now that buster has been released with an InRelease file, the time has IMO come for us to drop support for the old stuff from APT! Timeline suggestion --- now

Bug#928395: unblock: apt/1.8.1

2019-05-06 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 02:15:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed > > Julian Andres Klode: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > >

Bug#928395: unblock: apt/1.8.1

2019-05-03 Thread Julian Andres Klode
licitIdx = diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index ea66922bf..a150c0769 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +apt (1.8.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Add test case for local-only packages pinned to never + * Prevent shutdown while runnin

Bug#926045: unblock: software-properties/0.96.20.2-2

2019-03-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
-03-30 20:45:34.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +software-properties (0.96.20.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * softwareproperties/AptAuth.py: Use apt-key (Closes: #867681) + * debian/gbp.conf: Point to debian/buster + + -- Julian Andres Klode Sat, 30 Mar 2019 20:45:34 +0100 + software

Bug#924308: unblock: python-apt/1.8.4

2019-03-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/ubuntu/ diff -Nru python-apt-1.8.3/debian/changelog python-apt-1.8.4/debian/changelog --- python-apt-1.8.3/debian/changelog 2019-02-04 12:50:31.0 +0100 +++ python-apt-1.8.4/debian/changelog 2019-03-11 12:49:18.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +python-apt (1.8.4) u

Bug#924004: unblock: apt/1.8.0

2019-03-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
urgency=medium + + [ David Kalnischkies ] + * Add explicit message for unsupported binary signature (Closes: #921685) + + [ Milo Casagrande ] + * [l10n] Update Italian translation + + [ Julian Andres Klode ] + * Fix name of APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Stats (was ...Update-Post...) + * CMake: Install

Bug#914611: transition: yaml-cpp

2018-11-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition After discussion in #debian-release last week, I NMUed yaml-cpp with an SONAME bump to fix bug #914190. We need to binNMU the reverse dependencies listed in the transition tracker for

Bug#879176: transition: lz4

2018-03-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:32:06PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear release team, > > I'd like to push lz4 1.8.0 into unstable. > The library packge name has not changed

Bug#875695: stretch-pu: package apt/1.4.8

2017-09-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 05:08:59PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo > > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 07:30:17PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Hi, I'd like to upload apt 1.4.8 to stretch. > > > > It fixes a cr

Bug#875695: stretch-pu: package apt/1.4.8

2017-09-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 07:30:17PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Hi, I'd like to upload apt 1.4.8 to stretch. I'd really appreciate it if

Bug#874742: stretch-pu: kscreenlocker/5.8.7-1+deb9u1

2017-09-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 05:56:45PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:49:10 +0200, Maximiliano Curia wrote: > > > kscreenlocker 5.8.6-2 currently in stretch to 5.8.7-1+deb9u1 > > # > > > > kscreenlocker (5.8.7-1+deb9u1) stretch;

Bug#875695: stretch-pu: package apt/1.4.8

2017-09-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
archs, this +crashes the mirror method (LP: #1613184) + + [ Julian Andres Klode ] + * Do not warn about duplicate "legacy" targets (Closes: #839259) +(LP: #1697120) + * apt-daily: Pull in network-online.target in service, not timer +- this can cause a severe boot p

Bug#867190: stretch-pu: package apt/1.4.7

2017-07-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:00:06PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed > > On Sun, 2017-07-09 at 17:08 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > The first one by David, the second by me, so this would end up > > something like the following (o

Bug#867190: stretch-pu: package apt/1.4.7

2017-07-09 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 03:22:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 09:38 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 07:58:11AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > > > > > Hi, > > >

Bug#867190: stretch-pu: package apt/1.4.7

2017-07-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 07:58:11AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > Hi, > > Julian Andres Klode <j...@debian.org> (2017-07-04): > > This release fixes several smaller bugs in the network connection. > > Apart from the changes in t

Bug#867190: stretch-pu: package apt/1.4.7

2017-07-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
from SRV record instead of initial port => Might have picked the wrong port [ Julian Andres Klode ] * Reset failure reason when connection was successful => Some failures were only treated as warnings, not errors * debian/gbp.conf: Set debian-branch to 1.4.y => Building ... * http

Bug#862785: unblock: apt/1.4.4

2017-05-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
-upgrade >/dev/null 2>&1 && check_stamp $UPGRADE_STAMP $UnattendedUpgradeInterval; then @@ -475,6 +506,7 @@ # check cache size check_size_constraints +fi # # vim: set sts=4 ai : diff -Nru -w apt-1.4.1/debian/changelog apt-1.4.4/debian/changelog --- apt-1.4.1/debian/cha

Bug#862489: unblock: apt/1.4.3

2017-05-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package apt Fixes the maintainer scripts to only stop/restart timers in the apt package, not all packages (#862001) and updates Czech translation (#861943). unblock

Bug#861860: unblock: apt/1.4.2

2017-05-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
tended-upgrade (success)" else @@ -475,6 +499,7 @@ # check cache size check_size_constraints +fi # # vim: set sts=4 ai : diff -Nru -w apt-1.4.1/debian/changelog apt-1.4.2/debian/changelog --- apt-1.4.1/debian/changelog 2017-04-24 18:47:55.0 +0200 +++ apt-1.4.2/deb

RFC: One more timer change for apt

2017-04-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Hi everyone, while trying to fix the issue of unattended upgrades running at any point of the day, apt 1.4.1 reduced the whole update and upgrade daily script to run between 6 and 7am. This unleashes another problem: Bandwidth and load peaks. If all your machine fetch updates and upgrades

Bug#861105: unblock: apt/1.4.1

2017-04-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
+1,14 @@ +apt (1.4.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Julian Andres Klode ] + * systemd: Rework timing and add After=network-online (LP: #1615482) + * debian/rules: Actually invoke dh_clean in override_dh_clean + + [ Unit 193 ] + * apt-ftparchive: Support '.ddeb' dbgsym packages + + -- Julian Andres K

Bug#856037: unblock: apt/1.4~rc2

2017-02-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apt-1.4~rc1/debian/changelog apt-1.4~rc2/debian/changelog --- apt-1.4~rc1/debian/changelog2017-02-06 14:41:23.0 +0100 +++ apt-1.4~rc2/debian/changelog2017-02-22 16:02:10.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,19 @@ +apt (1.4~rc2) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ David Kalnischkies ]

Bug#853168: unblock: opencv/2.4.9.1+dfsg-2.2

2017-01-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
+0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +opencv (2.4.9.1+dfsg-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add Breaks against all non-v5 packages to all v5 packages, this +fixes apt dist-upgrade. (Closes: #853124) + + -- Julian Andres Klode <j...@debian.org> Mon, 30 Jan 2017 13:21:19 +0100 +

Bug#817992: jessie-pu: package apt/1.0.9.8.3

2016-03-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 05:20:38PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 14:20 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > I'd like to update APT in jessie from 1.0.9.8.2 to 1.0.9.8.3 to > > fix a stack buffer overflow the th

Bug#817992: jessie-pu: package apt/1.0.9.8.3

2016-03-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, I'd like to update APT in jessie from 1.0.9.8.2 to 1.0.9.8.3 to fix a stack buffer overflow the the dependency resolver, backported from apt 1.2.6. A compressed complete diff

Re: Bug#810785: ifupdown breaks debootstrap of Debian

2016-01-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:16:29PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:24:00AM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > > > > dpkg: error processing archive > > > > /var/cache/apt/archives/ifupdown_0.8.6_amd64.deb (--unpack): > > > >

Re: Bug#810785: ifupdown breaks debootstrap of Debian

2016-01-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
o, you want an unconfigured init system or other unconfigured packages in the base system? Really? That does not make any sense at all. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. When replying, only quote what is necessary, and write each reply directly below the part(s) it pertains to (`inline'). Thank you.

Re: Bug#810785: ifupdown breaks debootstrap of Debian

2016-01-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:38:33PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:13:23PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > > We are talking about bootstrapping, not upgrading. Automatic > > deconfiguration of packages is entirely irrelevant here. > > > &g

Bug#806251: transition: apt

2015-11-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
broken libept package) - binNMU goplay everywhere Apart from that libept issue, the transition seems to go very well. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. When replying, only quote what is necessary, and write each reply directly below the part(s) it pertains to (`inline'). Thank you.

Bug#799070: jessie-pu: package apt/1.0.9.8.2

2015-09-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:21:26PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 17:12 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > + * hide first pdiff merge failure debug message (Closes: 793444) > [...] > > + * mark again deps of pkg

Bug#799070: jessie-pu: package apt/1.0.9.8.2

2015-09-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
+(Closes: 793360) (LP: 1479207) -> Dependencies of meta packages were not marked as manually installed + + [ Julian Andres Klode ] + * Do not parse Status fields from remote sources -> Remote sources could set "Status: install ok installed" on a package making APT believe

Bug#788928: jessie-pu: package python-apt/0.9.3.12

2015-06-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 07:44:54PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 12:50 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: +python-apt (0.9.3.12) jessie; urgency=medium + + [ Julian Andres Klode ] + * apt/cache.py: Work around a cyclic reference from

Bug#788928: jessie-pu: package python-apt/0.9.3.12

2015-06-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
stable update for vivid). I put de...@lists.debian.org in X-Debbugs-CC. Here's an annotated changelog for reference python-apt (0.9.3.12) jessie; urgency=medium [ Julian Andres Klode ] * apt/cache.py: Work around a cyclic reference from Cache to its methods (Closes: #745487) - This one

Bug#717445: pu: package ndiswrapper/1.57-1+deb7u1

2015-05-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
oOn Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 06:33:52PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2014-12-06 at 21:22 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hi, On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 02:57:22PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: I'm most likely going to ship the patch below in 1.59-2

Bug#717445: pu: package ndiswrapper/1.57-1+deb7u1

2014-01-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
:00:00 2001 From: Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:15:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Hardcode /etc/modprobe.d/ndiswrapper.conf We do not support modprobe.conf anymore. The code failed to work with recent kernels that only export two components in the version, so things were

Re: software-properties-gtk: #666869 (Ubuntu bits): stable backport?

2013-10-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Fixing CVE-2013-1061 is more urgent, though; although I did not understand the impact of that one yet. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ

Bug#717445: pu: package ndiswrapper/1.57-1+deb7u1

2013-07-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
above, so I came up with the attached patch (committed in a *local* branch). Please comment. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 5654ab5..acdab74

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-05-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:14:21AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Hi Julian, On 12/03/13 00:42, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package management stack in wheezy from update-manager and other components to PackageKit. Those

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-05-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 03:52:44PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: As stated a few months in this discussion, upgrade-system merely Suggests update-notifier. It therefore doesn't need to be removed. Martin-Éric I remembered that, that's why I did not mention it again. -- Julian Andres

Bug#703003: [pre-approval] unblock: python-apt/0.8.8.2

2013-03-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 08:22:26PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 23:52 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: +python-apt (0.8.8.2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + [ David Prévot ] + * po/no.po: Remove useless translation (superseded by nb.po

Bug#703003: [pre-approval] unblock: python-apt/0.8.8.2

2013-03-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
) + + [ Julian Andres Klode ] + * apt/package.py: Try both filenames for package file lists +(Closes: #700715) + + -- David Prévot taf...@debian.org Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:37:17 -0400 + python-apt (0.8.8.1) unstable; urgency=low * python/tag.cc: === removed file 'po/no.po' --- po/no.po

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-03-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:21:52PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 00:42:45 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package management stack in wheezy from update-manager and other components to PackageKit

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-03-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 06:59:01AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: 2013/3/12 Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org: Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package management stack in wheezy from update-manager and other components to PackageKit. Those old

Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-03-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Please let me know what you think, and if I missed something. PS: Yes, I know that we're late in freeze, but I feel that we should not have that package in a stable release. PPS: Please keep me CCed (and maybe pkg-gnome-maintainers as well) -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-03-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 07:52:24PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package management stack in wheezy from update-manager and other components to PackageKit. Those

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-03-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 01:04:25AM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 07:52:24PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package management stack

Bug#694656: unblock: update-notifier/0.99.3debian11

2012-11-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
-cleanup is purged +(Closes: #606623) + * Let update-notifier-common depend on gettext-base (Closes: #620509) + + -- Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:49:01 +0100 + update-notifier (0.99.3debian10) unstable; urgency=low [ Martin Pitt ] === modified file 'debian

Bug#694010: unblock: dh-autoreconf/7

2012-11-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
to autoreconf by default + * dh_autoreconf_clean: Correctly handle spaces in file names (Closes: #692317) + * dh_autoreconf_clean: Remove invalid and unneeded comments + + -- Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org Thu, 22 Nov 2012 23:31:00 +0100 + dh-autoreconf (6) unstable; urgency=low

Re: Bug#683323: unblock: python-apt/0.8.7

2012-11-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
a reasonable network connection. I can upload it tomorrow or the day after, if you're still travelling then. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ

Why tagged moreinfo? (WAS: Re: Processed: tagging 683323)

2012-10-01 Thread Julian Andres Klode
. Added tag(s) moreinfo. Why did you add moreinfo? There were no unanswered questions. Mehdi requested a debdiff for 0.8.4.1, Michael provided it. We'd like to continue somehow. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak

Re: Bug#678227: Bug#641967: Apt downloads all description translations

2012-08-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
is not recognized, contrary to normal languages, so we'd need to check for C and C.UTF-8. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: Bug#678227: Bug#641967: Apt downloads all description translations

2012-08-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:05:33PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:47:09 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:47:43AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: David Kalnischkies, le Tue 28 Aug 2012 10:31:23 +0200, a écrit : The issue also happens

Bug#683323: unblock: python-apt/0.8.7

2012-08-27 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:10:17PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: ke, 2012-08-08 kello 01:50 +0200, Cyril Brulebois kirjoitti: Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org (30/07/2012): Since the version of testing, this contains mostly bug fixes and many translation updates, but also

Bug#685068: RM: sessioninstaller/0.20-1

2012-08-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak

Bug#683323: unblock: python-apt/0.8.7

2012-07-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. pgpP17RS6dbmd.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: binNMUing on some architectures breaks Multi-arch: same

2012-04-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
architectures or a sourcefull upload. Or accept that such packages aren't multiarch co-installable for now. If we want working multi-arch, those packages need to be co-installable, otherwise it is almost totally useless. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http

binNMUing on some architectures breaks Multi-arch: same

2012-04-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
architectures, and cannot be binNMUed on a subset of the supported architectures only. I have CCed deity@l.d.o to let some others now about this email. I'm not subscribed to -release, but to deity, so please have me and/or deity in To or CC. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http

Re: binNMUing on some architectures breaks Multi-arch: same

2012-04-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:56:27AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 11:52 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: it seems that libffi5 received a binNMU on armhf. As libffi5 is marked Multi-arch: same, it is now not possible to have the armhf version installed on an amd64

  1   2   >