On 2022-03-18 09:17:57 -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:14:25PM -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> > gnupg1 also has the dependency in Recommends and should be rebuilt.
>
> ^^^ Just wanted to re-highlight gnupg1 as it still links the old libldap.
binNMU scheduled
Hi Sebastian,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:14:25PM -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote:
gnupg1 also has the dependency in Recommends and should be rebuilt.
^^^ Just wanted to re-highlight gnupg1 as it still links the old
libldap.
I looked through unstable's Packages by hand to see if I missed anything
gnupg1 also has the dependency in Recommends and should be rebuilt.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:15:54PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
If it's really just compile-tome constants and not actual symbols, then
that it's fine.
There is one source file (SOGoLDAPUserDefaults.m) that calls ldap_
functions, but from the build log it looks like the feature isn't
On 2022-03-14 14:07:34 -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:00:59PM -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> > sogo is probably ok. It depends on libldap-dev because it uses a couple
> > of constants from , but it doesn't seem to link -lldap itself,
> > instead relying on libsope1 to link it
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:00:59PM -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote:
sogo is probably ok. It depends on libldap-dev because it uses a
couple of constants from , but it doesn't seem to link -lldap
itself, instead relying on libsope1 to link it transitively.
... although right after I sent this, it
collectd and monitoring-plugins should be rebuilt as well. They are
showing as unknown in the tracker because they list their plugins' shlib
dependencies in Suggests and Recommends respectively. Sorry it didn't
occur to me to list those fields in the ben file.
sogo is probably ok. It depends
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 02:26:20PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Please take a look at golang-openldap. It's an arch: all package and
hardcodes a dependency on libldap-2.4-2
Thanks. I hadn't noticed it was hard-coded. Filed #1006456.
Also examining some of the "unknown" rows in the
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/openldap-2.5.html
Bug #1006456 [release.debian.org] transition: openldap
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/openldap-2.5.html'.
--
1006456:
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/openldap-2.5.html
On 2022-03-12 11:26:19 -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 10:15:31PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Please go ahead
>
> Thank you. openldap/2.5.11+dfsg-1 has just been accepted into
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 10:15:31PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Please go ahead
Thank you. openldap/2.5.11+dfsg-1 has just been accepted into unstable.
Should I bump the remaining autopkgtest issues to RC severity at this
time?
Could you please update the ben file for the transition?
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1006456 [release.debian.org] transition: openldap
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1006456: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006456
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2022-02-26 19:50:47 -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> Wine has been fixed. I confirmed a successful build with openldap 2.5.
Please go ahead
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Wine has been fixed. I confirmed a successful build with openldap 2.5.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-openldap-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: block -1 by 1006016
Control: block -1 by 1005996
Control: block -1 by 990335
Control: block -1 by 989409
Dear release
15 matches
Mail list logo
