Le 12/09/2023 à 14:29, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:36:00AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 at 10:39:44 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
llvm-defaults has been pointing to 16 in experimental for quite sometime.
Opening this transition to make sure it is on
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:36:00AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 at 10:39:44 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > llvm-defaults has been pointing to 16 in experimental for quite sometime.
> > Opening this transition to make sure it is on your radar! :)
> >
> > I opened bug
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 at 19:46:07 +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Simon McVittie kirjoitti 11.9.2023 klo 12.36:
> > I've opened a Mesa bug at wishlist severity suggesting a move to version
> > 16, and set it to block the bug for llvm-toolchain-15 removal (#1050070).
>
> The remaining blocker for this
Simon McVittie kirjoitti 11.9.2023 klo 12.36:
On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 at 10:39:44 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
llvm-defaults has been pointing to 16 in experimental for quite sometime.
Opening this transition to make sure it is on your radar! :)
I opened bug #1050070 & #1050069 for future
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 = confirmed
Bug #1050071 [release.debian.org] llvm-defaults: move to 16
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1050071: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050071
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 2023-09-11 11:05:40 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 at 12:03:10 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > And one more issue: llvm-toolchain-16 does not build python3-lldb-16 on
> > mips64el, rendering python3-lldb uninstallable there.
>
> I think
On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 at 12:03:10 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> And one more issue: llvm-toolchain-16 does not build python3-lldb-16 on
> mips64el, rendering python3-lldb uninstallable there.
I think this is actually a non-issue? python3-lldb:mips64el is no longer
built from
On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 at 10:39:44 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> llvm-defaults has been pointing to 16 in experimental for quite sometime.
> Opening this transition to make sure it is on your radar! :)
>
> I opened bug #1050070 & #1050069 for future removals.
Mesa is a significant user of LLVM,
On 2023-09-09 11:59:33 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2023-09-09 10:30:57 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > Le 31/08/2023 à 14:47, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> > >
> > > On 2023-08-19 10:39:44 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > > > Package:
On 2023-09-09 10:30:57 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le 31/08/2023 à 14:47, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> >
> > On 2023-08-19 10:39:44 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
Le 31/08/2023 à 14:47, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2023-08-19 10:39:44 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
Let's upgrade llvm one more time.
I am
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1050071 [release.debian.org] llvm-defaults: move to 16
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1050071: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050071
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2023-08-19 10:39:44 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User:release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hello,
>
> Let's upgrade llvm one more time.
>
> I am aware of mipsel and mips64el build
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
Let's upgrade llvm one more time.
I am aware of mipsel and mips64el build failures. I am looking into it.
llvm-defaults has been pointing to 16 in experimental for quite
14 matches
Mail list logo
