Re: Bug#1060188: transition: flatbuffers

2024-01-21 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 06:58:37PM -0500, Mo Zhou wrote: > > On 1/21/24 10:54, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > Should those that are not part of the transition tracker use the shared > > library or not? > flatbuffers is like protobuf. I'm not sure how many rdeps among

Re: Bug#1060188: transition: flatbuffers

2024-01-21 Thread Mo Zhou
On 1/21/24 10:54, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Control: tags -1 confirmed Should those that are not part of the transition tracker use the shared library or not? flatbuffers is like protobuf. I'm not sure how many rdeps among the list links against it statically.

Bug#1060188: transition: flatbuffers

2024-01-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi On 2024-01-07 01:11:24 -0500, M. Zhou wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: flatbuff...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:flatbuffers > > The

Processed: Re: Bug#1060188: transition: flatbuffers

2024-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1060188 [release.debian.org] transition: flatbuffers Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1060188: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060188 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1060188: transition: flatbuffers

2024-01-06 Thread M. Zhou
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: flatbuff...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:flatbuffers The flatbuffers version in unstable is rather old. I'd like to start the transition. All reverse