On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 06:58:37PM -0500, Mo Zhou wrote:
>
> On 1/21/24 10:54, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > Should those that are not part of the transition tracker use the shared
> > library or not?
> flatbuffers is like protobuf. I'm not sure how many rdeps among
On 1/21/24 10:54, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Should those that are not part of the transition tracker use the shared
library or not?
flatbuffers is like protobuf. I'm not sure how many rdeps among the list
links against it statically.
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi
On 2024-01-07 01:11:24 -0500, M. Zhou wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: flatbuff...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:flatbuffers
>
> The
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1060188 [release.debian.org] transition: flatbuffers
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1060188: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060188
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: flatbuff...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:flatbuffers
The flatbuffers version in unstable is rather old. I'd like to start
the transition. All reverse
5 matches
Mail list logo