On 12-06-17 at 12:06pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
according to [1] we have
After Sunday the 20th of May, any new transitions are likely not to be
processed until after the release.
So that transition is way too late, and the result is that libv8 3.10.8
should be uploaded to experimental instead.
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:52:40 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-06-17 at 12:06pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
according to [1] we have
After Sunday the 20th of May, any new transitions are likely not to be
processed until after the release.
So that transition is way too late, and the
On 12-06-17 at 01:04pm, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:52:40 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-06-17 at 12:06pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
according to [1] we have After Sunday the 20th of May, any new
transitions are likely not to be processed until after the
release.
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Whoa - would you mind reconsidering that?
Why? He's done the right thing...
three packages (with no other packages depending on them) needing a simple
rebuild actually sounds feasible in a very shortest time.
But it's
On 17/06/2012 12:52, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-06-17 at 12:06pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
according to [1] we have
After Sunday the 20th of May, any new transitions are likely not to be
processed until after the release.
So that transition is way too late, and the result is that libv8 3.10.8
[dropping cc - we should all be following bugreport by now]
On 12-06-17 at 01:22pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
On 17/06/2012 12:52, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-06-17 at 12:06pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
according to [1] we have After Sunday the 20th of May, any new
transitions are likely not to be
On 17/06/12 12:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I disagree that it is too late. We were only told it is less likely to
be approved the later we request it.
Hi,
I thought this transition had already been requested, approved, and just
waiting on an upload to stable?
On 15/06/12 00:34, Cyril
Hi Steven,
On 12-06-17 at 12:58pm, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 17/06/12 12:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I disagree that it is too late. We were only told it is less likely
to be approved the later we request it.
I thought this transition had already been requested, approved, and
just
8 matches
Mail list logo
