Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sugar is severely broken (see bug#782414) and not suitable for Jessie. Please drop *all* sugar packages for Jessie. In addition to the directly affected packages listed in subject, please also drop all of its reverse (build-)dependencies, and libraries with no reverse dependencies besides those of dropped packages. Here is a complete list of packages to drop: src:python-aiml/0.8.6-2 src:python-elements/0.13+svn20090823.230+dfsg-2 src:python-xklavier/0.4-4 src:sugar-0.96/0.96.1-2.1 src:sugar-0.98/0.98.8-1 src:sugar-artwork-0.84/0.84.4-3 src:sugar-artwork-0.88/0.88.1-4 src:sugar-artwork-0.96/0.96.2-2 src:sugar-artwork-0.98/0.98.4-1 src:sugar-base-0.84/0.84.2-4 src:sugar-base-0.88/0.88.0-4 src:sugar-base-0.96/0.96.0-1 src:sugar-base-0.98/0.98.0-1 src:sugar-datastore-0.84/0.84.1-3.1 src:sugar-datastore-0.88/0.88.0-4 src:sugar-datastore-0.96/0.96.0-1 src:sugar-datastore-0.98/0.98.1-1 src:sugar-presence-srvice-0.84/0.84.3-1.1 src:sugar-presence-service-0.88/0.88.0-3.1 src:sugar-presence-service-0.90/0.90.2-1 src:sugar-toolkit-0.96/0.96.3-1 src:sugar-toolkit-gtk3/0.98.7-1 src:sugar-toolkit-0.88/0.88.1-4 src:sugar-toolkit-0.84/0.84.17-1 src:sugar-toolkit-0.98/0.98.1-1 sugar-terminal-activity/28-1.2 sugar-record-activity/82-1.2 sugar-pippy-activity/46~dfsg-2 sugar-physics-activity/7+dfsg-1.2 sugar-moon-activity/11-1.1 sugar-memorize-activity/35-1.1 sugar-log-activity/24-1.1 sugar-irc-activity/8-1.2 sugar-connect-activity/22-1.2 sugar-chat-activity-0.84/65-5.1 sugar-calculate-activity/40-2 sugar-browse-activity/137-1 sugar-etoys-activity/116-3 One additional reverse dependency - education-desktop-sugar - is part of a larger set of binary packages and thus need special care (see bug#782504): This should be solved by an upload tonight. One other package - sugar-turtleart-activity - arguably should be dropped as well, but it is maintained outside of the Sugar/OLPC team and do not declare any tight relationships with infrastructural Sugar packages so a) do not technically affect dropping Sugar, and b) possibly is indeed usable on its own - i.e. if not then that's an independent bug. Regards, - Jonas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVLPMAAAoJECx8MUbBoAEhNOoP/iuzVzb7xufvMIlqkRSlE6qO 4D8z4lF4oDfYyaqbOrerhYQEWmptbPek3WVz/wcdE/Zw3Y9eMfVakgdWRDFL33Eb IGShoz9fN3jNI4YR44HyPOH4LMeekku7rTWa7GxZ7EKwUp8a1hp8KkrdtYUIKMfe G1xW5K0TH3SBw+o8OIluSZ+JsLVZrOjP7gx8M+uixiB3dQ0XkqhT9yMJcW51VnoZ fqqjvc8dU3NMZhsqMjapwtQL/PE61zkRsDt7mtJ9PkKa58Xw2NiCglbb7gusSKF3 aOM2fXs5ohUD+rNCNEpeE6ZYPuBuKH9K7BzAhBFc5duvjGHUpSNp85ATWG9l2G51 ptbK8DvHrb7EanO9d8UkpgJr7rymRIkoSoY1QtTlZe3cMwHLgXeP/KPYMaN+BvNs LDRmmRlbEGVOEpt38/foQAZgyrt1PNKQ+lPaLDDgDDVSpIWRDxu5Ej2vrCfGmZL7 CsHTcCA/vo+hGPUP49BMWZyS2575x5YTUP/4TtuGCSACUmsg88POaNPx4lCzaN0G hQjQmXqkSKQ0WH3kFTHswcgvXk5jqbwFqXmoIniaYHRa09tfEZ4Vt6r5rWc36zz6 W43xgKycapLKxVjyYl+znkReVDUu2Xn6CYApR7s57ijezH4FsM3aU3ALP8MSajlN I763HOv+CZAzpEYafbkq =6p3C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150414105915.20707.40886.report...@bastian.jones.dk