On 3 June 2018 at 00:29, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 11:22:07PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> > I found this while rebuilding r-cran-cummerbund (level 13) in Ubuntu,
>> > so anything else missing is a leaf package (or set of leaf packages, I
>> > guess).
>>
>> Do you
On 02/06/18 15:48, Graham Inggs wrote:
> On 1 June 2018 at 21:45, Graham Inggs wrote:
>> On 1 June 2018 at 21:43, Graham Inggs wrote:
>>> r-cran-fastica also seems to be missing r-api-3.4 so doesn't appear on
>>> the tracker, but needs a rebuild.
>>
>> Sorry, my mistake, please ignore.
>
> OK,
On 1 June 2018 at 21:45, Graham Inggs wrote:
> On 1 June 2018 at 21:43, Graham Inggs wrote:
>> r-cran-fastica also seems to be missing r-api-3.4 so doesn't appear on
>> the tracker, but needs a rebuild.
>
> Sorry, my mistake, please ignore.
OK, this time I'm pretty sure r-cran-fastcluster is
On 1 June 2018 at 18:35, Graham Inggs wrote:
| On 01/06/2018 17:19, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > This is now taken care of: dbi_1.0.0-2 was just uploaded
|
| Thanks Dirk!
|
| Another weirdness I have come across in Ubuntu today is rebuilds of
| r-cran-expm and r-cran-mlmrev fail with the
On 1 June 2018 at 21:43, Graham Inggs wrote:
> r-cran-fastica also seems to be missing r-api-3.4 so doesn't appear on
> the tracker, but needs a rebuild.
Sorry, my mistake, please ignore.
r-cran-fastica also seems to be missing r-api-3.4 so doesn't appear on
the tracker, but needs a rebuild.
On 01/06/2018 17:19, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
This is now taken care of: dbi_1.0.0-2 was just uploaded
Thanks Dirk!
Another weirdness I have come across in Ubuntu today is rebuilds of
r-cran-expm and r-cran-mlmrev fail with the following:
dh_auto_install: warning: can't parse dependency
On 1 June 2018 at 06:32, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 1 June 2018 at 12:41, Graham Inggs wrote:
| | A warning: src:dbi has a hard-coded dependency on r-api-3.4 in
| | debian/control, and src:wkward has the same in debian/rules.
|
| That was from when dh-r was borked and could not cope with
On 1 June 2018 at 13:37, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| On 01/06/18 13:32, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 1 June 2018 at 11:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| > | Scheduled for cluster foreign rmpi nlme rmatrix robustbase lmtest
survival lme4
| > | tseries.
| >
| > Why is that needed?
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 11:54:35AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > I don't see anything wrong with these source packages, as simply rebuilding
> > them
> > is enough for the r-api-3.5 dependency to appear.
> >
> > Was there a bug in dh-r at the time these were uploaded?
It smells like
On 01/06/18 13:32, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 1 June 2018 at 11:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> | Scheduled for cluster foreign rmpi nlme rmatrix robustbase lmtest survival
> lme4
> | tseries.
>
> Why is that needed? Aren't ALL binary packages auto-rebuilt?
Depending on your
On 1 June 2018 at 12:41, Graham Inggs wrote:
| A warning: src:dbi has a hard-coded dependency on r-api-3.4 in
| debian/control, and src:wkward has the same in debian/rules.
That was from when dh-r was borked and could not cope with srcname != pkgname.
I can look into fixing it this morning
On 1 June 2018 at 11:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| Scheduled for cluster foreign rmpi nlme rmatrix robustbase lmtest survival
lme4
| tseries.
Why is that needed? Aren't ALL binary packages auto-rebuilt?
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
A warning: src:dbi has a hard-coded dependency on r-api-3.4 in
debian/control, and src:wkward has the same in debian/rules.
I was unable to find any more [1][2] like these codesearch.d.o.
[1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=path%3Adebian%2Fcontrol+r-api-3.4
[2]
On 01/06/2018 11:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Scheduled for cluster foreign rmpi nlme rmatrix robustbase lmtest survival lme4
tseries.
Thanks!
On 01/06/18 11:44, Graham Inggs wrote:
> On 01/06/2018 10:09, Graham Inggs wrote:
>> On 1 June 2018 at 09:24, Graham Inggs wrote:
>>> Does anyone know why some packages, e.g. cluster, foreign, nlme and
>>> rmatrix appear different on the tracker [1]?
>>>
>>> Did they lose their dependency on
On 01/06/2018 10:09, Graham Inggs wrote:
On 1 June 2018 at 09:24, Graham Inggs wrote:
Does anyone know why some packages, e.g. cluster, foreign, nlme and
rmatrix appear different on the tracker [1]?
Did they lose their dependency on r-api-3.4 somewhere along the line?
Was this intentional?
Do
On 1 June 2018 at 09:24, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Does anyone know why some packages, e.g. cluster, foreign, nlme and
> rmatrix appear different on the tracker [1]?
>
> Did they lose their dependency on r-api-3.4 somewhere along the line?
> Was this intentional?
> Do they also need to be rebuilt?
>
Does anyone know why some packages, e.g. cluster, foreign, nlme and
rmatrix appear different on the tracker [1]?
Did they lose their dependency on r-api-3.4 somewhere along the line?
Was this intentional?
Do they also need to be rebuilt?
[1]
Hi Sébastien,
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:57:48AM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:20:48AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > I have uploaded r-cran-pkgconfig at Thu May 31 20:37:04 BST 2018 [1] and it
> > was accepted to unstable at Thu May 31 20:53:21 BST 2018 [2].
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:20:48AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have uploaded r-cran-pkgconfig at Thu May 31 20:37:04 BST 2018 [1] and it
> was accepted to unstable at Thu May 31 20:53:21 BST 2018 [2]. However,
> packages.d.o states it has r-api-3.4! :-(
It's because r-cran-pkgconfig
Hi Andreas
On 1 June 2018 at 08:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have uploaded r-cran-pkgconfig at Thu May 31 20:37:04 BST 2018 [1] and it
> was accepted to unstable at Thu May 31 20:53:21 BST 2018 [2]. However,
> packages.d.o states it has r-api-3.4! :-(
Check the build logs [1], it seems it
Hi Emilio,
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 09:25:50AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
> Cool, it's almost built everywhere now.
I have uploaded r-cran-pkgconfig at Thu May 31 20:37:04 BST 2018 [1] and it
was accepted to unstable at Thu May 31 20:53:21 BST 2018 [2]. However,
packages.d.o states
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 09:25:50AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
> Cool, it's almost built everywhere now.
Question: The arch:all packages are not yet marked green despite I've
uploaded more then 50% more than 8 hours ago. Is there any reason for
a delay in the display?
BTW, I'd
On 31/05/18 16:56, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 31 May 2018 at 16:15, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> | Hi,
> |
> | On 31/05/18 15:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> | > On 31/05/18 15:09, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | >>
> | >> Emilio, Seb,
> | >>
> | >> Can you confirm that now that we have
On 31/05/18 16:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 31 May 2018 at 16:17, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> | > (Out of nerdy curiousity because we sometimes drive rebuilds of [generally
> | > much smaller] subsets, where is the code that "walks" the dependency
> graph?
> | > Is that in libapt by
On 31 May 2018 at 16:17, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| > (Out of nerdy curiousity because we sometimes drive rebuilds of [generally
| > much smaller] subsets, where is the code that "walks" the dependency graph?
| > Is that in libapt by chance [as I happen to have a package getting from R to
|
On 31 May 2018 at 16:15, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| Hi,
|
| On 31/05/18 15:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| > On 31/05/18 15:09, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >>
| >> Emilio, Seb,
| >>
| >> Can you confirm that now that we have
| >> a) "green light" on the transition, and
| >> b) the
On 31/05/18 16:10, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 31 May 2018 at 15:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> | On 31/05/18 15:09, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | >
> | > Emilio, Seb,
> | >
> | > Can you confirm that now that we have
> | > a) "green light" on the transition, and
> | > b) the r-base
Hi Dirk,
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 08:09:28AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Can you confirm that now that we have
> a) "green light" on the transition, and
> b) the r-base package is in unstable
> we should see binary: any packages being rebuilt -- which I do not yet
> see. When will this
Hi,
On 31/05/18 15:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 31/05/18 15:09, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>>
>> Emilio, Seb,
>>
>> Can you confirm that now that we have
>> a) "green light" on the transition, and
>> b) the r-base package is in unstable
>> we should see binary: any packages being
On 31 May 2018 at 15:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| On 31/05/18 15:09, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > Emilio, Seb,
| >
| > Can you confirm that now that we have
| > a) "green light" on the transition, and
| > b) the r-base package is in unstable
| > we should see binary: any
On 31/05/18 15:09, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Emilio, Seb,
>
> Can you confirm that now that we have
> a) "green light" on the transition, and
> b) the r-base package is in unstable
> we should see binary: any packages being rebuilt -- which I do not yet
> see. When will this start?
I
Emilio, Seb,
Can you confirm that now that we have
a) "green light" on the transition, and
b) the r-base package is in unstable
we should see binary: any packages being rebuilt -- which I do not yet
see. When will this start?
On 31 May 2018 at 05:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 31 May
On 31 May 2018 at 09:25, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| On 31/05/18 00:13, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 30 May 2018 at 23:40, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| > | curl migrated to testing today. Please go ahead with R 3.5.
| >
| > Yay!! Thank you -- and r-base_3.5.0-3 is now in incoming
On 31/05/18 00:13, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 30 May 2018 at 23:40, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> | curl migrated to testing today. Please go ahead with R 3.5.
>
> Yay!! Thank you -- and r-base_3.5.0-3 is now in incoming awaiting inclusion
> into unstable.
Cool, it's almost built
On 30 May 2018 at 23:40, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| Control: tags -1 confirmed
|
| On 28/05/18 15:00, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| > On 28/05/18 14:32, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >>
| >> On 28 May 2018 at 14:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| >> | Control: tags -1 - confirmed
| >> |
|
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 28/05/18 15:00, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 28/05/18 14:32, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>>
>> On 28 May 2018 at 14:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> | Control: tags -1 - confirmed
>> |
>> | On 28/05/18 13:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> | > Control: tags
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #896667 [release.debian.org] transition: r-base-3.5
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
896667: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896667
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 28/05/18 14:32, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 28 May 2018 at 14:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> | Control: tags -1 - confirmed
> |
> | On 28/05/18 13:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> | > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> | >
> | > On 23/04/18 13:57, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> | >>
On 28 May 2018 at 14:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| Control: tags -1 - confirmed
|
| On 28/05/18 13:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| > Control: tags -1 confirmed
| >
| > On 23/04/18 13:57, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
| >> Package: release.debian.org
| >> Severity: normal
| >> User:
Control: tags -1 - confirmed
On 28/05/18 13:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 23/04/18 13:57, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>> X-Debbugs-Cc:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - confirmed
Bug #896667 [release.debian.org] transition: r-base-3.5
Removed tag(s) confirmed.
--
896667: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896667
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 23/04/18 13:57, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debia...@lists.debian.org
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> Please schedule a transition for R
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #896667 [release.debian.org] transition: r-base-3.5
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
896667: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896667
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: debia...@lists.debian.org
Dear Release Team,
Please schedule a transition for R 3.5, which has just been uploaded to
experimental.
Due to changes in R internals, all R
46 matches
Mail list logo
