Bug#994540: Go ahead with imagemagick/experimental ?

2023-10-22 Thread Bastien Roucariès
gt; > > On 2023-10-21 20:10:47 +0000, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > > > Can I go ahead with imagemagick experimental ? > > > > > > As a year has past since the last mail to the transition bug report: did > > > any new build failures in reverse depende

Processed: Re: Go ahead with imagemagick/experimental ?

2023-10-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #994540 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 994540: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994540 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#994540: Go ahead with imagemagick/experimental ?

2023-10-22 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2023-10-22 14:51:42 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > Le dimanche 22 octobre 2023, 14:08:20 UTC Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > > Hi Bastien > > > > On 2023-10-21 20:10:47 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > > Can I go ahead

Re: Go ahead with imagemagick/experimental ?

2023-10-22 Thread Bastien Roucariès
Le dimanche 22 octobre 2023, 14:08:20 UTC Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > Hi Bastien > > On 2023-10-21 20:10:47 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > Can I go ahead with imagemagick experimental ? > > As a year has past since the last mail to the transition bug report: did >

Re: Go ahead with imagemagick/experimental ?

2023-10-22 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Bastien On 2023-10-21 20:10:47 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > Can I go ahead with imagemagick experimental ? As a year has past since the last mail to the transition bug report: did any new build failures in reverse dependencies appear? What's the status? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher

Go ahead with imagemagick/experimental ?

2023-10-21 Thread Bastien Roucariès
Hi, Can I go ahead with imagemagick experimental ? Thanks Bastien signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.