Svante Signell, le Thu 09 May 2013 16:25:46 +0200, a écrit :
Why do you expect anything to be different now compared when the freeze
happened, _several months ago_, in zero time?
Please avoid this level of language, it can't bring anything good to the
discussion.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 21:47 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi Samuel,
On 06/05/13 21:35, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Steven Chamberlain, le Mon 06 May 2013 21:20:57 +0100, a écrit :
In that case would there be 150-200 RC-severity bugs introduced right
away by its inclusion?
I would
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 16:39 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Thu 09 May 2013 16:25:46 +0200, a écrit :
Why do you expect anything to be different now compared when the freeze
happened, _several months ago_, in zero time?
Please avoid this level of language, it can't bring
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:07:42AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Neil McGovern, le Tue 07 May 2013 11:14:01 +0100, a écrit :
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:27:54PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
We have not worked too much on the hardware support in the past months,
so it is basically network
Neil McGovern, le Wed 08 May 2013 11:35:52 +0100, a écrit :
About disk support, I happen to have right now a few days of holiday
with no RL plans (at last!), so I'll work on the SATA driver. Having it
working within a month should just happen.
But not tested - how about USB - did that
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 04:33:03PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Neil McGovern, le Wed 08 May 2013 11:35:52 +0100, a écrit :
But not tested - how about USB - did that ever get sorted?
We have not worked on it.
How about things like wireless drivers, raid controllers,
suspend/resume,
Neil McGovern, le Wed 08 May 2013 16:07:26 +0100, a écrit :
No, just something that works for the majority of our users. I'm fairly
sure things like SATA and USB is considered essential.
SATA, yes. USB, less.
d) VMWare/VBox etc.
This already works.
Just tried it with vbox
Sorry to clutter the mailing list.
But as a long time lurker at the mailing list I would just like to thank the
Hurd team for all your efforts!
@Samuel, I totally agree with you on your points.
I have been happily running Hurd on my (reasonably new) core 2 computer for a
year. It wasn't
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (08/05/2013):
I'm afraid I'll still not be able to explain people when they ask me
why hurd-i386 is not in testing, except vague reasons.
For the record, and speaking only for myself, I'd love to see a proper
architecture qualification process, rather than
Cyril Brulebois, le Wed 08 May 2013 17:52:13 +0200, a écrit :
Now, I think everyone having actually worked on the release would
enjoy (and probably deserve) a few days/weeks of rest before resuming
release duties, which include:
I was also thinking the same when I saw the issue popping up
On 08/05/13 16:52, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (08/05/2013):
I'm afraid I'll still not be able to explain people when they ask me
why hurd-i386 is not in testing, except vague reasons.
For the record, and speaking only for myself, I'd love to see a proper
Steven Chamberlain, le Wed 08 May 2013 18:36:33 +0100, a écrit :
My idea would be to look at the (I estimate) 90+ packages that are
out-of-date in sid on GNU/Hurd but not other arches, and were not
already removed by #704477. This includes some important ones like
gcc-4.8, gdb.
gcc-4.8 was
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 8. Mai 2013, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Now, I think everyone having actually worked on the release would
enjoy (and probably deserve) a few days/weeks of rest before resuming
release duties, which include:
[..]
But please allow the release team to lean back
a few moments.
I
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:27:54PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
We have not worked too much on the hardware support in the past months,
so it is basically network board drivers from linux 2.6.32, and IDE
disk support. I for instance installed it on my Dell D430, and network
just works fine.
Neil McGovern, le Tue 07 May 2013 11:14:01 +0100, a écrit :
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:27:54PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
We have not worked too much on the hardware support in the past months,
so it is basically network board drivers from linux 2.6.32, and IDE
disk support. I for
On 08/05/13 00:07, Samuel Thibault wrote:
I don't know what ethernet driver these would need.
Should probably start a GNU/Hurd hardware status page on the Wiki...
Neil McGovern, le Tue 07 May 2013 11:14:01 +0100, a écrit :
a) A HP DL360 or similar
The chipset has changed a bit between
Steven Chamberlain, le Wed 08 May 2013 00:59:19 +0100, a écrit :
d) VMWare/VBox etc.
This already works.
Also, Xen support just works [...]
With network connectivity?
Sure.
If so which NIC do they emulate? (rtl8139?)
They don't emulate a nic, it's ParaVirtualization.
What
Steven Chamberlain, le Wed 08 May 2013 00:59:19 +0100, a écrit :
Neil McGovern, le Tue 07 May 2013 11:14:01 +0100, a écrit :
a) A HP DL360 or similar
The chipset has changed a bit between generations:
G1: eepro (Linux) or fxp (*BSD) driver, requiring non-free microcode
We haven't worked
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 05:07:13PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
So, release people: How likely is it that Hurd gets added to jessie?
Within the next one or two months I mean, not maybe in a years
time. :)
I don't see it happening, to be honest.
Neil
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, I have been significantly out of the loop for a while now but what do you
base that on?
What requirements are we still falling short on?
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
On 5/6/2013 7:08 AM, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 05:07:13PM
On 05/05/13 16:07, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
...released together
with all the others (probably as a technology preview)...
So, release people: How likely is it that Hurd gets added to jessie?
If added as a 'technology preview', what does that mean exactly?
Would Hurd-specific RC-severity bugs
with all the others (probably as a technology preview)...
So, release people: How likely is it that Hurd gets added to jessie?
If added as a 'technology preview', what does that mean exactly?
Note that the tech preview was a softening of a requirement to get added
to wheezy. Which didnt
On 06/05/13 20:27, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Adding it and then keeping it out of the usual migration rules is asking
for failure from the beginning, accumulating cruft. Not a way to go, IMO.
In that case would there be 150-200 RC-severity bugs introduced right
away by its inclusion? (Packages
Neil McGovern, le Mon 06 May 2013 17:15:45 +0100, a écrit :
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:36:55AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
OK, I have been significantly out of the loop for a while now but what
do you base that on?
What requirements are we still
Joerg Jaspert, le Mon 06 May 2013 21:27:46 +0200, a écrit :
Adding it and then keeping it out of the usual migration rules is asking
for failure from the beginning, accumulating cruft. Not a way to go, IMO.
Excluding from the migration rules would probably become a headache,
yes. But wouldn't
Steven Chamberlain, le Mon 06 May 2013 21:20:57 +0100, a écrit :
On 06/05/13 20:27, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Adding it and then keeping it out of the usual migration rules is asking
for failure from the beginning, accumulating cruft. Not a way to go, IMO.
In that case would there be 150-200
Hi Samuel,
On 06/05/13 21:35, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Steven Chamberlain, le Mon 06 May 2013 21:20:57 +0100, a écrit :
In that case would there be 150-200 RC-severity bugs introduced right
away by its inclusion?
I would rather say simply dropping them, as already requested in
Bug#704477.
Steven Chamberlain, le Mon 06 May 2013 21:47:00 +0100, a écrit :
On 06/05/13 21:35, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Steven Chamberlain, le Mon 06 May 2013 21:20:57 +0100, a écrit :
In that case would there be 150-200 RC-severity bugs introduced right
away by its inclusion?
I would rather say
Hi
From our FTPMaster meeting 2011 minutes[1]:
--8schnipp-8---
- In a discussion with the Debian Hurd porters it was decided that the
Hurd port stays on FTPMaster until Wheezy is released. Should they
have managed to get the port into a state
29 matches
Mail list logo
