Loïc Minier wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/imagemagick/507269/diff-control.txt
Hmm why didn't you add the Provides to libmagickwand-dev (which depends
on libmagickcore-dev and so pulls everything which used to be there)?
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Regarding the -dev package names, I'm personally OK if you don't
introduce transitional packages and just add Provides: fields, because
AFAICS only 2 packages in the archive have a versioned build-dependency
on imagemagick.
Concerning Provides, I
Hi!
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:13:35 +0100
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this sound doable from your side? In particular, using Provides
is much easier than using transitional packages, so it should be less
effort for you. (Unless somebody has spotted that it won't work, in
that
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rebuild of the reverse build dependencies of libmagick++9-dev, using
libmagick++-dev with the provides:
=
With libmagick++-dev, libmagick++1, libmagickcore-dev, libmagickcore1,
libmagickwand-dev,
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/imagemagick/507269/diff-control.txt
Hmm why didn't you add the Provides to libmagickwand-dev (which depends
on libmagickcore-dev and so pulls everything which used to be there)?
xine-lib - FTBFS (I think
Hello, Nelson. #507269 has been recently brought to our attention, and
I'd like to pop in because, unlike what you state in the bug report,
this issue affects Debian, so it should be addressed if possible,
independently of whether that benefits Ubuntu or not. Let's see if we
can agree on
7 matches
Mail list logo
