Re: ruby1.9.1 migration to testing

2011-11-03 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 14:11:26 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: At this point, I'm confident that we can reach a (at least partially) working Ruby on kfreebsd, sparc and armel at some point. I'm less confident about ia64. Question: what should we do in the meantime? Options are: (1) keep

Re: ruby1.9.1 migration to testing

2011-11-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 03/11/11 at 21:27 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 14:11:26 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: At this point, I'm confident that we can reach a (at least partially) working Ruby on kfreebsd, sparc and armel at some point. I'm less confident about ia64. Question: what

ruby1.9.1 migration to testing

2011-10-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Dear release team, ruby1.9.1 1.9.3~rc1-1 is ready to migrate on some architectures. The status on the others is a bit problematic. I'm commenting below on the state of the various issues. The original mail can be found at http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2011/08/msg00038.html. On 29/08/11

Re: ruby1.9.1 migration to testing

2011-10-23 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/23 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net: [kfreebsd] waitpid from threads problem [...] [kfreebsd] thread-related hangs FYI Petr has been working on a cleaner solution from Glibc side, see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/09/msg00072.html -- Robert Millan -- To