On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 14:11:26 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
At this point, I'm confident that we can reach a (at least partially)
working Ruby on kfreebsd, sparc and armel at some point. I'm less
confident about ia64.
Question: what should we do in the meantime? Options are:
(1) keep
On 03/11/11 at 21:27 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 14:11:26 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
At this point, I'm confident that we can reach a (at least partially)
working Ruby on kfreebsd, sparc and armel at some point. I'm less
confident about ia64.
Question: what
Dear release team,
ruby1.9.1 1.9.3~rc1-1 is ready to migrate on some architectures. The
status on the others is a bit problematic.
I'm commenting below on the state of the various issues. The original
mail can be found at http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2011/08/msg00038.html.
On 29/08/11
2011/10/23 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net:
[kfreebsd] waitpid from threads problem
[...]
[kfreebsd] thread-related hangs
FYI Petr has been working on a cleaner solution from Glibc side, see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/09/msg00072.html
--
Robert Millan
--
To
4 matches
Mail list logo