Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: sc...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:scipy
Please unblock package scipy
This is a prerequest, before uploading.
[ Reason ]
scipy is central tool for numerical
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:scipy
Bug #1032073 [release.debian.org] unblock: scipy/1.10.1-1
Added indication that 1032073 affects src:scipy
--
1032073: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032073
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Copying the upstream scipy 1.10.1 Release Notes for your convenience.
From https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/release.1.10.1.html
SciPy 1.10.1 is a bug-fix release with no new features compared to
1.10.0.
Issues closed for 1.10.1
#14980: BUG: Johnson’s algorithm fails without negative
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi release team!
Since the current state of the freeze, I thought I'd check with you guys
before uploading ola 0.10.9.
A bit of background: there were a few compatibility bugs in ola 0.10.8
(currently in stable) which meant that it was kicked out of
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:25:01 +0100
with message-id <58fa5fff-5e22-eb68-19ab-bdb6ab694...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1032065: ola: request RT acknowledgement for update to
upstream version 0.10.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032065,
regarding ola: request RT
Hi,
Le 27/02/2023 à 08:18, David Prévot a écrit :
Le 26/02/2023 à 21:54, Paul Gevers a écrit :
On 08-02-2023 13:53, David Prévot wrote:
[ Tests ]
I didn’t test it thoroughly (I doubt to have much time for at least
another week), but it passes
There are issues with the installability of
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2023 22:06:36 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1031124: unblock: mariadb/1:10.11.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031124,
regarding unblock: mariadb/1:10.11.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:27:47 +0100
with message-id <29b08cf6-780d-3a7e-fa20-f6b1b33a1...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1032037: unblock: linux/6.1.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032037,
regarding unblock: linux/6.1.12-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Control: tags 994758 - bookworm-ignore
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for caring.
On 25-02-2023 14:30, Adrian Bunk wrote:
With the bookworm-ignore for #994758,
I'll admit that I misjudged that bug; with this message I'll clear the
bookworm-ignore tag.
bullseye and bookworm
will ship libsgutils2-2
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:11:34 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1032004: nmu: packages built by golang-1.15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032004,
regarding nmu: packages built by golang-1.15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Hi Drew
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 14:12, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I recommend we allow scipy 1.10.1 into bookworm (assuming it passes 10
> day freeze testing as normal). I'm filing this bug to check if you
> agree that's a good idea before building and uploading to
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1032073 [release.debian.org] unblock: scipy/1.10.1-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1032073: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032073
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:29:07PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, dem 24.02.2023 um 16:01 +0100 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> [...]
> > Could we also ship the README.Debian.security that was recently added
> > in unstable to bullseye/buster?
>
> I've just uploaded a new
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 04:54:33PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On 20-02-2023 13:09, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > If the release team would be willing to grant an exception to the policy
> > to get this done, we can get this wrapped up inside a week I
14 matches
Mail list logo
