On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:17:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Due to change in one of the Brazilian timezone last week-end, I have
uploaded version 2011l-0squeeze1 of tzdata to
stable-proposed-updates.
For the record, I pushed this via squeeze-updates overnight (see
SUA17-1).
Technically only
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 07:49:50AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:17:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Due to change in one of the Brazilian timezone last week-end, I have
uploaded version 2011l-0squeeze1 of tzdata to
stable-proposed-updates.
For the record, I pushed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-09-14 00:38, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a release goal of enabling hardening build flags[1]
for all C/C++ packages in the archive[2]. For Wheezy, specific sub-goals are
being chosen.
The default flags are almost
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:28:54PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2011-10-18, Marc Haber mh+debian-packa...@zugschlus.de wrote:
when entities deploy Debian via network install, point releases can
pose challenges. For example, a site I consult for has a mirror which
is rsynced daily, but the
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:43:35 +0200
with message-id 4e9e8db7.8000...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Include how to compile information in INSTALL
has caused the Debian Bug report #645781,
regarding Include how to compile information in INSTALL
to be marked as done.
This means
- ace: There have been a number of gcc-4.6 updates, I gave
it back to see if the ICE has been fixed or not.
The build that resulted from the most recent give-back
failed but it did so in a VERY strange manner.
It claimed to install libzzlib-dev and zlib1g-dev yet it
failed to link against
CC debian release security
Le mercredi 19 octobre 2011 à 12:21 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
Upstream has released Java SE 6 update 29 yesterday:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuoct2011-443431.html
with security fixes.
Well, that especially means that it is now
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote:
CC debian release security
Le mercredi 19 octobre 2011 à 12:21 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
Upstream has released Java SE 6 update 29 yesterday:
On Wed, October 19, 2011 12:50, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
CC debian release security
Le mercredi 19 octobre 2011 à 12:21 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
Upstream has released Java SE 6 update 29 yesterday:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuoct2011-443431.html
with
On 10/19/2011 02:09 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Have we been in contact with Oracle upstream and explained that we are
eager to comply with their wish to move entirely to openjdk for our next
release, but have the problem that we have a stable release out in the
field that people rely on? Are
On Wed, October 19, 2011 14:15, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 10/19/2011 02:09 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Have we been in contact with Oracle upstream and explained that we are
eager to comply with their wish to move entirely to openjdk for our next
release, but have the problem that we have a
On mer., 2011-10-19 at 15:28 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
What I'm wondering is if we tried to ask upstream whether they would be
willing to extend the DLJ offer so we can keep security fixes for the
sun-java6 version in stable coming in for the lifetime of this release,
notwithstanding the
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 03:28:02PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
What I'm wondering is if we tried to ask upstream whether they would be
willing to extend the DLJ offer so we can keep security fixes for the
sun-java6 version in stable coming in for the lifetime of this release,
notwithstanding
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:39:03PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
Impressive design. What would happen if it skips half of the config? I
agree that not segfaulting is incredibly better than segfaulting, but like
this the remaining bunch of lines will be silently ignored?
I've rewritten
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 01:37:17PM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
I'm reopening the bug since this affects users that upgrade tangogps
from lenny to squeeze, and if a simple migration strategy can be found,
it could still make sense to add it to a stable update.
A very simple way to do it could
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:19:27PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
I guess we concluded on the Debconf stairs that it's a tad late for
this now? That all users will have had their apparent data loss
already? :)
Indeed we did. Closing the bug.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568
Hi Philipp,
Am 19.10.2011 16:33, schrieb Philipp Kern:
Or it's the removal of the package.
we should remove sun-java5 from oldstable, too, if we are going to
remove sun-java6 from (old)stable. But I do not have a strong opinion on
that.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 629477 with 645921
Bug #629477 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc
Was blocked by: 644868 618184 629198 643972 629204 642162 629206 618205 629424
642928 643973 629202 629215
Added blocking bug(s) of 629477:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 629477 with 645923
Bug #629477 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc
Was blocked by: 618184 644868 645921 629198 643972 629204 642162 629206 618205
642928 629424 629202 643973 629215
Added blocking bug(s) of
On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 11:42 -0400, Luke Faraone wrote:
On 14/10/11 20:05, Alexander Chernyakhovsky wrote:
I encountered bug #548717 on my Debian Squeeze system that uses kerberos
authentication and hesiod groups. Unlike the situation described in the
bug, I could not easily remedy this by
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 629477 with 645926
Bug #629477 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc
Was blocked by: 645923 644868 618184 645921 629198 643972 629204 642162 629206
618205 629424 642928 643973 629202 629215
Added blocking
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 629477 with 645927
Bug #629477 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc
Was blocked by: 645926 645923 618184 644868 645921 629198 643972 629204 642162
618205 629206 642928 629424 629202 643973 629215
Added
Processing changes file: etherape_0.9.8-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ifupdown-extra_0.14.2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: quassel_0.6.3-2+squeeze2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 629477 with 645933
Bug #629477 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc
Was blocked by: 645926 645921 642162 643972 629204 643973 645927 645923 618184
644868 629198 618205 629206 642928 629424 629202 629215
Added
24 matches
Mail list logo
