Attempted fix for Tesseract fix uploaded just now.
On 12/18/2017 07:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 18/12/17 19:19, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 12/17/2017 11:08 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 12/17/2017 02:27 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 12/17/2017 10:38 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 15/12/17
Processing control commands:
> block 884504 by -1
Bug #884504 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal
884504 was not blocked by any bugs.
884504 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 884504: 884967
--
884504: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884504
884967:
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:43:24 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#884804: nmu: cacti_1.1.28+ds1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #884804,
regarding nmu: cacti_1.1.28+ds1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Samuel Thibault, on jeu. 21 déc. 2017 15:42:13 +0100, wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois, on jeu. 21 déc. 2017 15:37:00 +0100, wrote:
> > I don't think that's an issue with cherry-picking the relevant commit,
> > since it doesn't seem to contain any indications the default voice is
> > getting set to
Cyril Brulebois, on jeu. 21 déc. 2017 15:37:00 +0100, wrote:
> I don't think that's an issue with cherry-picking the relevant commit,
> since it doesn't seem to contain any indications the default voice is
> getting set to English?
IIRC I had issues without it, so it was on purpose, and just
Hi,
Samuel Thibault (2017-12-17):
> Several blind users have reported that the Debian Installer speech
> synthesis was not working on their computer, thus making it unusable
> for them. It happens that this is due to odd numbering of sound cards
> by ALSA on those
Hello Michael,
I think this mail went through the cracks as we haven't received a reply
from you so far. Can you let us know the status and whether we can help to
get the wheezy update out ?
Cheers,
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2017-07-19 11:35:56, Michael Shuler wrote:
> >
On 21/12/17 00:47, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after I fixed kcalcore (#883960), now digikam should use libical2, just
> like kcalcore did and still does, hence avoid loading both libical2 and
> libical3. Can you please rebuild digikam in unstable and experimental?
Done.
Emilio
9 matches
Mail list logo