Bug#996204: Bug#998411: Bug#996204: transition: numerical library stack: hypre SONAME (Policy 8.1)

2021-11-04 Thread Anton Gladky
I have fixed gmsh. It will appear in NEW soon. Regards Anton

Bug#996204: transition: numerical library stack: hypre SONAME (Policy 8.1)

2021-11-04 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2021-11-04 21:41, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: On 2021-11-03 22:33:01 +0100, Drew Parsons wrote: ... The problem that hypre 2.18.1-1 (un-versioned libhypre) intended to solve is that hypre is ABI-ignorant (https://github.com/hypre-space/hypre/issues/56), so each point patch release would have

Processed: Re: Bug#998067: transition: libsepol and libsemanage

2021-11-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #998067 [release.debian.org] transition: libsepol and libsemanage Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 998067: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998067 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#998067: transition: libsepol and libsemanage

2021-11-04 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2021-10-29 13:44:16 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hello, > > libsepol and libsemanage have both bumped their soname from 1 to 2, the >

Bug#997997: marked as done (transition: netcdf-parallel)

2021-11-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 4 Nov 2021 22:28:45 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#997997: transition: netcdf-parallel has caused the Debian Bug report #997997, regarding transition: netcdf-parallel to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#996204: transition: numerical library stack: hypre SONAME (Policy 8.1)

2021-11-04 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2021-11-03 22:33:01 +0100, Drew Parsons wrote: > On 2021-11-03 20:57, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Source: hypre > > Severity: serious > ... > > The real blocker is hypre, specifically: > > > > hypre (2.18.1-1) experimental; urgency=medium > > . > >* Team upload. > >* New upstream

Processed: your mail

2021-11-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 998169 - moreinfo Bug #998169 [release.debian.org] transition: unixodbc Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 998169: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998169

Processed: Re: bullseye-pu: package kodi/19.3+dfsg1-1~deb11u1

2021-11-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 Bug #995823 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package kodi/19.3+dfsg1-1~deb11u1 Marked Bug as done -- 995823: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995823 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#995823: bullseye-pu: package kodi/19.3+dfsg1-1~deb11u1

2021-11-04 Thread Vasyl Gello
Control: close -1

Bug#998436: bullseye-pu: package opendmarc/1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-6+deb11u1

2021-11-04 Thread David Bürgin
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu I would like to propose a stable update for opendmarc. [ Reason ] Since releasing the opendmarc version in Debian bullseye, two important issues affecting it have been reported

Processed: Re: bullseye-pu: package kodi/19.3+dfsg1-1~deb11u1

2021-11-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 bullseye-pu: package kodi/19.3+dfsg1-1~deb11u1 Bug #995823 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package kodi/19.2+dfsg1-2~deb11u1 Changed Bug title to 'bullseye-pu: package kodi/19.3+dfsg1-1~deb11u1' from 'bullseye-pu: package kodi/19.2+dfsg1-2~deb11u1'.