Control: -1 usertag + transition
On 2023-06-20 03:14, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
On 2023-06-20 01:18, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
nmu control-setup_1.221 . all . -m 'Rebuild against xkb-data 2.38-2'
Sorry about the typo. Should better be:
nmu console-setup_1.221 . all . -m 'Rebuild against
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 06:20:44PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> One small comment:
>
> +if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" le 0.18.3-1; then
> +# we're updating from 0.18-3 or earlier, chown aideinit logs
>
> That should presumably be "from 0.18.3".
In the mean time, 0.18.3-1 has reached
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1038673 - src:control-setup
Bug #1038673 [release.debian.org] nmu: console-setup_1.221
Removed indication that 1038673 affects src:control-setup
> affects 1038673 - src=console-setup
Bug #1038673 [release.debian.org] nmu:
On 2023-06-20 01:18, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
nmu control-setup_1.221 . all . -m 'Rebuild against xkb-data 2.38-2'
Sorry about the typo. Should better be:
nmu console-setup_1.221 . all . -m 'Rebuild against xkb-data 2.38-2'
(don't do these things when you ought to sleep)
/ Gunnar
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1038673 - src=control-setup
Bug #1038673 [release.debian.org] nmu: console-setup_1.221
Removed indication that 1038673 affects
> affects 1038673 + src=console-setup
Bug #1038673 [release.debian.org] nmu: console-setup_1.221
Added
Hi,
On 6/19/23 17:02, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Hi,
I'm sending this separately to a similar mail for 12.1. That's because the
timings are far enough out that they would make sense on separate weekends,
but they could also be stretched[1] and combined.
Two months from 29th April is around the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debia...@lists.debian.org, gunna...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:xkeyboard-config src:control-setup
Hi!
I uploaded xkeyboard-config 2.38-2 to unstable (as an NMU), but
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:xkeyboard-config src:control-setup
Bug #1038673 [release.debian.org] nmu: console-setup_1.221
Added indication that 1038673 affects src:xkeyboard-config and src:control-setup
--
1038673: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038673
Hi
On 6/19/23 17:04, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Hi,
The promised 4-6 weeks following release for 12.1 looks like:
8th July (4)
15th July (5)
22nd July (6)
If the 8th is doable Press can do it and the 15th, would prefer the 15th or
22nd.
--
Be well,
-Donald
--
-
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 = confirmed
Bug #1028528 [release.debian.org] transition: libcotp
Added tag(s) confirmed; removed tag(s) trixie and moreinfo.
--
1028528: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028528
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 2023-06-12 19:40:14 +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote:
> Hello Sebastian,
>
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 20:26:50 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
> wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 trixie
> >
> > On 2023-01-19 15:38:06 +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote:
>
Hi Anton
On 2023-01-30 19:28:37 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> thanks for the information. Let's do it just after release.
>
> Just for the record. The full test rebuild has been done (thanks to Lucas!).
> Results and logs are here:
>
> http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/01/15/
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1027959 [release.debian.org] transition: libkiwix
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1027959 to the same tags previously set
--
1027959: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027959
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2023-01-15 15:35:30 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 trixie
>
> Hi
>
> On 2023-01-12 00:51:05 -0500, Kunal Mehta wrote:
> > On 1/5/23 04:48, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >
> > > > I'd like to do the transition for libkiwix (and sibling libzim) in
Hi,
Jonathan Wiltshire (2023-06-19):
> The promised 4-6 weeks following release for 12.1 looks like:
>
> 8th July (4)
> 15th July (5)
> 22nd July (6)
>
> The first of them would combine with a very stretched 11.8; SRM might
> prefer to get 11.8 done earlier and leave more time for 12.1 to
Hi,
Jonathan Wiltshire (2023-06-19):
> I'm sending this separately to a similar mail for 12.1. That's because the
> timings are far enough out that they would make sense on separate weekends,
> but they could also be stretched[1] and combined.
>
> Two months from 29th April is around the 1st
Hi,
The promised 4-6 weeks following release for 12.1 looks like:
8th July (4)
15th July (5)
22nd July (6)
The first of them would combine with a very stretched 11.8; SRM might
prefer to get 11.8 done earlier and leave more time for 12.1 to mature.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi,
I'm sending this separately to a similar mail for 12.1. That's because the
timings are far enough out that they would make sense on separate weekends,
but they could also be stretched[1] and combined.
Two months from 29th April is around the 1st July, so I propose:
1st July
8th July
15th
18 matches
Mail list logo