On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 14:55 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 11:28:21AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > Argh, forgot to respond to this. :-(
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 06:59:03PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The next point release for
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear Release Team,
[ Reason ]
The libmsgsl-dev package in stable is currently incompatible with std::variant
from GNU's libstdc++. To solve this issue, I propose a patch adding
On Sat, 2023-10-07 at 21:59 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 06:59:03PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > How about:
> > 4th December (better for cadence)
> > 11th December (more likely suitable in practice)
>
> Erm, astute readers will realise the 4th and 11th are
Hi,
On 2023-11-09 15:57, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
We can of course schedule the binNMUs, but I am wondering why are those
required?
I wanted to check whether they rebuild successfully on buildd. I have
not done this before, just wanted to be extra careful this time. But of
course I may as
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 11:28:21AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Argh, forgot to respond to this. :-(
>
>On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 06:59:03PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>The next point release for bookworm should be around the end of November
>>2023. We're about a week behind cadence
Your message dated Thu, 9 Nov 2023 14:59:11 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1055477: nmu: dovecot-fts-xapian_1.5.5-1+b3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055477,
regarding nmu: dovecot-fts-xapian_1.5.5-1+b3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:01:36 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1055235: nmu: libgnatcoll_24.1.20230921-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055235,
regarding nmu: libgnatcoll_24.1.20230921-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1055194 [release.debian.org] transition: openturns
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1055194: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055194
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Le Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 02:01:57PM +0100, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>
> The first and foremost reason why we're not enthusiastic about defaulting to
> removal of packages from testing is that that's a disservice to our users of
> testing.
Hi Paul,
I understand that you feel responsible for the
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2023-11-01 22:49:33 +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: opentu...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:openturns
>
> Dear Release
Your message dated Thu, 9 Nov 2023 14:58:18 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1055478: nmu: dovecot-antispam_2.0+20171229-1+b12
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055478,
regarding nmu: dovecot-antispam_2.0+20171229-1+b12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1055487 [release.debian.org] nmu: openstructure_2.6.0~rc-1~exp
spglib_2.1.0-1~exp
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1055487: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055487
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Andrius
On 2023-11-07 11:15:44 +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to request binNMU on amd64 for packages recently accepted to
>
Hi Andreas,
On 07-11-2023 18:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
You did not yet answered the question I asked twice whether we can find
a compromise by simply removing packages with missing new dependencies
from testing. I consider this a compromise which I would really love to
discuss honestly.
I'll
14 matches
Mail list logo
