Your message dated Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:16:44 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1069099: binNMUs to fix mtdev-using udebs
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069099,
regarding binNMUs to fix mtdev-using udebs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:05:43 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1069084: nmu: apt-move_4.2.27-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069084,
regarding nmu: apt-move_4.2.27-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:04:55 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1069020: release.debian.org: binNMUs to fix
libpng-using udebs
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069020,
regarding release.debian.org: binNMUs to fix libpng-using udebs
to be marked as done.
This means
Cyril Brulebois (2024-04-16):
> Please consider binNMU-ing both packages against libmtdev-dev (>= 1.1.6-1.2)
> on all archs, provided that doesn't interfere with the whole 64-bit time_t
> transition:
> - libinput10
That ought to read:
- libinput
Sorry about that.
> -
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
mtdev regressed a while back, leading a few udebs to become uninstallable
(initially one[1], now two).
1. https://bugs.debian.org/1066071
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu apt-move_4.2.27-6 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild for 64-bit time_t."
According to https://bugs.debian.org/1065069 the previous nmu may have
picked up too old build dependencies and
6 matches
Mail list logo
