Hi,
On 30-04-2024 12:43 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-dkms
Right. I was talking about Testsuite-Triggers in the sources file
generated by dpkg. Unfortunately the automation one gets with autodep8
doesn't extend that far and the triggers you are interested in are
On 29/04/2024 19.49, Paul Gevers wrote:
As I hinted at in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069600#25, once
there's an *test* dependency relation with linux, this will be tested.
There should be a test dependency on linux-doc, but unfortunately I
cannot find any record that
Hi Andreas,
On 29-04-2024 10:52 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
These failures could show up as autopkgtest failures in bookworm-pu.
Are they flagged somewhere in your tooling s.t. they don't go unnoticed?
As I hinted at in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069600#25, once
Le 2024-04-07 à 06 h 41, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:50:39AM -0500, Jérôme Charaoui wrote:
I had an exchange with a fellow DD about this update and uploading this to
bookworm-backports was suggested as a possible alternative considering the
large size of the .debdiff
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: affects -1 + src:wireplumber
Dear Release Team,
Please schedule a transition slot for wireplumber 0.5.
The auto-generated ben tracker was deleted (not sure why),
but here is a
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:wireplumber
Bug #1070043 [release.debian.org] transition: wireplumber 0.5
Added indication that 1070043 affects src:wireplumber
--
1070043: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070043
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> block 1069878 with -1
Bug #1069878 [dm-writeboost-dkms] dm-writeboost-dkms: kernel module fails to
build for Linux 6.7.12: error: too few arguments to function ‘dm_io’
1069878 was not blocked by any bugs.
1069878 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of
Hi Jonathan,
I have removed the +1 from version number as you mentioned, and uploaded
to bookworm. Please accept the package.
Jonathan wrote:
> Is this actually a backport of current unstable though? In which case
> it should include the changelog from 1.0.4 and be 1.0.4~deb12u1.
It is *not*
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: block 1069878 with -1
Control: affects -1 + src:dm-writeboost
Hi,
the 6.1.85-1 kernel in bookworm-pu causes module build failures for
dm-writeboost-dkms (#1069878) and
[Romain Tartière 2024-02-09]
> In case I missed something and the ball is in my court, please point me
> to the next move because I obviously missed it!
I suspect your next move is to track down a sponsor willing to upload
your version to Debian. Such sponsor would be a Debian developer able
to
10 matches
Mail list logo