Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package exim4
Apart from fixing the hardening build (release goal) it only includes
documentation and transaltion fixes and the updated VCS information
(git instead of svn).
gnutls26-doc package which drops manpages and info
+format documentation in favour of being co-installable with
+gnutls-doc.
+
+ -- Andreas Metzler ametz...@debian.org Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:21:25 +0100
+
gnutls26 (2.12.20-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru gnutls26
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package exim4, it contains two important fixes from
upstream GIT:
+ 85_server_set_id_SPA.diff: server_set_id was not stored in
$authenticated_id when using SPA
.
+
+ -- Andreas Metzler ametz...@debian.org Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:08:53 +0100
+
exim4 (4.80-5.1) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team.
diff -Nru exim4-4.80/debian/patches/85_server_set_id_SPA.diff
exim4-4.80/debian/patches/85_server_set_id_SPA.diff
--- exim4-4.80
On 2004-04-18 Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't currently have a lot of testing scripts juju, so I'm not really
sure, but I suspect there's a bit of circularity going with pwlib getting
into testing.
Afaict there are about a dozen packages that need to go in at the same
time,
On 2004-04-18 Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've been upgrading to gnome 2.6 from experimental for some time, and i
must say i'm quite impressed: it just works for me and i like it much.
There are two things i see (from a user and -dev-user point of view) we
_really_ need to do
Hello,
I do not understand this:
* trying to update mozilla from 2:1.5-3 to 2:1.6-5 (candidate is 10
days old)
* Updating mozilla makes 2 depending packages uninstallable on alpha:
epiphany-browser, galeon
Afaict both epiphany-browser and galeon only have dependencies on
mozilla-foo (=
Hello,
Now that kdepim is finally in sync on m68k I was thinking whether it
would go into testing and stumbled e.g. over this:
In testing there a source-package juk that generates the binary
package juk, but the new version of kdemultimedia has juk integrated,
therefore there is no juk source in
Hello,
The debian-edu sourcepackage generates 23 metapackages which only
consist of dependencies. The dependencies are generated semi
automatically by the script gen-control. - It basically takes a task
file that lists packages that should be depended on, checks which ones
are actually available
On 2004-05-12 Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 07:25:12PM +0100, Carlos Valiente wrote:
On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 13:13, Andreas Metzler wrote:
The percentage of up to date packages for sid on s390 is currently
dropping like a stone.
Hi! I'm happily running
On 2004-05-16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just been looking at the http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/
output, and found a number of packages that might be able to go
into testing with a little help. I'm not very familiar with the
hinting process, so I would appreciate if someone
On 2004-05-16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
openmotif/2.1.30-5 [non-free]
RC bug (#231751: Open Motif 2.2.2 is Deprecated)
update (2.2.2-6) in unstable for 523 days
[...]
afaict from the bugreport 2.2.2 has been released and afterwards been
declared broken, i.e. the version in testing is
On 2004-05-16 Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
BTW any chance to speed up new libcupsys2 acceptation in experimental ?
The name has changed and it's in NEW ... having it accepted now would be
great since we are waiting on it for the last changes.
[...]
Looks like somebody
On 2004-05-18 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 06:31:25PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
[...]
Does gnutls10 include versioned symbols?
[...]
gnutls10 (and gnutls7) do include versioned symbols.
cu andreas
--
See, I told you they'd listen to
On 2004-05-18 Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 12:34:32PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
(OK, so let's try out replying via the mailing-lists links. Sorry if
this turns out bad)
Matthias Klose writes:
hmm, upload a new gcc-defaults to experimental
On 2004-05-22 Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
[...]
* gnutls 7-10 transition
The transition has been made in experimental for cups, gnome and related
packages.
Hrm; is this going to screw up d-i?
[...]
I doubt that (but I am not involved with d-i). debootstrap already
installs
On 2004-05-27 Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm the maintainer of the netkit-{telnet,ftp} and linux-ftpd packages.
Christoph Martin asked me to merge the SSL patches, that he maintains as
separate packages (netkit-{telnet,ftp}-ssl and linux-ftpd-ssl), into the
non-ssl source
Hello,
Now that kudzu has finally been compiled and uploaded for s390
pciutils should be able to go in.
easy pciutils/1:2.1.11-11 kudzu/1.1.67-1
cu andreas
PS: There is already a hint for pciutils alone in
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/cjwatson it just needs to
be
On 2004-06-11 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 09:49:33AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Now that kudzu has finally been compiled and uploaded for s390
pciutils should be able to go in.
easy pciutils/1:2.1.11-11 kudzu/1.1.67-1
[...]
Done (again - let's see
On 2004-06-23 Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since sarge will release with crypto in main, what is the current
status of the remaining packages in non-US? Can't all packages be
migrated into main so sarge can release without non-US?
According to the Sources.gz files on
Hello,
I've watched libdv for some time as it is part of the whole gnome2.6
mess (gst-plugins0.8 depends on it) but I think it just won't go in
without force.
I'd suggest something like this being introduced tomorrow, when
kino is 10 day old:
# the newer gem in sid is quite broken, FTBFS on
On 2004-06-23 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 06:07:19PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[libdv]
# the newer gem in sid is quite broken, FTBFS on multiple archs.
remove gem/0.87cvs20031031-3
I don't remember seeing this one in update_output either; what's
On 2004-06-23 Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've watched libdv for some time as it is part of the whole gnome2.6
mess (gst-plugins0.8 depends on it) but I think it just won't go in
without force.
[more foobar]
This was all just completely wrong, I was too stupid to understand why
On 2004-06-26 Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 08:01:16AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
15 soon. links-ssl will be replaced by a dummy-package depending on
elinks if the ftp-master's approve the respective upload.[1]
I found no footnote [1] in your
Hello,
Afaict[1] cups would be ready at next time the testing scripts run,
safe for this issue:
#255539 libqt3c102-mt: shlibs needs bump for plugin bic change
Afaik kdelibs is directly suffering from this bug, it needs the new qt
but does not depend on it, therefore I've submitted a dummy-bug
On 2004-06-30 Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Afaict[1] cups would be ready at next time the testing scripts run,
safe for this issue:
#255539 libqt3c102-mt: shlibs needs bump for plugin bic change
[...]
Afaict this leaves these possibilities to solve the issue:
#1 tag 255539 sarge
Hello,
Due to a wishlist bugreport (#258311) we are considering to switch
exim4 to a newer version of BerkelyDB, namely libdb4.2. As we are
pre-release I am asking you whether this would be acceptable before
spending any further thought on it.
Afaict it will not mess up d-i/debootstrap because
On 2004-07-11 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 09:11:57AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Due to a wishlist bugreport (#258311) we are considering to switch
exim4 to a newer version of BerkelyDB, namely libdb4.2. As we are
pre-release I am asking you whether
On 2004-07-11 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
You also appear to have introduced a new dependency from libgcrypt7 to
libpth2.
[...]
libgcrypt7 has not changed.
libgcrypt7 has always linked against the library contained in libpth2,
however libpth2 was broken for a long time, the
On 2004-07-11 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 05:15:25PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2004-07-11 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You also appear to have introduced a new dependency from libgcrypt7 to
libpth2.
libgcrypt7 has not changed
On 2004-07-11 Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2004-07-11 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 05:15:25PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2004-07-11 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You also appear to have introduced a new dependency from libgcrypt7
Hello,
I am pondering to try to get a new exim4 into sarge by means of
testing-proposed-updates.
Rationale:
exim4 is blocked by perl, and there is not yet hope to get this
resolved soon. The version in testing has a minor security bug
(CAN-2004-0400) and lots of outdated translations.
Would this
On 2004-07-15 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 01:32:07PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
I am pondering to try to get a new exim4 into sarge by means of
testing-proposed-updates.
Rationale:
exim4 is blocked by perl, and there is not yet hope to get
On 2004-07-15 Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2004-07-15 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 01:32:07PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[exim4 in TPU]
Please don't include anything
unnecessary/risky or anything that makes the diff (both of source
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 10:53:26AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
[...]
The upstream libtiff maintainers are going to skip some soname
versions when they do their next release. This makes it possible for
distributions to resolve this on their own by releasing 3.6.1 as
libtiff.so.4. FreeBSD
On 2004-07-24 J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 17:35:59 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
* the API changes are minor and only require recompilation;
only [...] recompilation. Please provide details on the number of
packages this affects. The last gnutls
On 2004-07-24 Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will upload a gnutls10 which builds against the new version
later today.
[...]
Bad news for you. :-( This change in the new gnutls10
| * Use hevea, not latex2html.
makes it FTBFS on hppa, m68k, mips, mipsel, s390 because hevea is
On 2004-07-25 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 09:48:21AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
[hevea]
Any other latex = HTML converters which don't require an in-depth latex
knowledge to adapt to? (I had help with hevea...)
Is there any chance this could be pushed
On 2004-07-31 Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Barth writes:
currently, three package still build-dep on gcc-3.2: libxml2,
systemimager and xen. However, 520 packages depend on one of the
libxml2-binary packages, including kde and gnome. So, I would consider
it a bad idea to
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:36:04AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
One maintainer replied to my message in time stating that his upload
was prepared and he was just waiting for his sponsor.
Which maintainer was this? A sponsored MU is always better than an NMU,
so I'd be happy to
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 12:08:48PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
[...]
FYI I've just filed this rc-bug (#262995), because we thought gtksee
was accidentally missed, as the current maintainer is a DD and does
not need a sponsor and therefore does not match the profile. - Sorry.
Did you find
On 2004-08-03 Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:51:17PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[...]
I'm preparing to perform a build with gcc-3.4 on another m68k host,
running unstable; I'll follow up with the results ASAP.
Hm. It didn't build, but that's probably
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.4-7
Severity: serious
This bug report is the result of a conversation on #debian-release, as
IRC is volatile I capture it now.
If gcc-3.3 is built on a machine with binutils 2.15 gcc's ./configure
test
| checking linker --as-needed support... yes
will succeed and
On 2004-08-06 Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Got a dumb question. I've uploaded all the pikes (pike7.2, pike7.4, pike7.6)
shortly after the issue popped up, fixed as necessary. Some architectures
built them, some failed to and some didn't even attempt. So, should I wait
till
Hello,
Sorry for the overlong subject. ;-)
It has been brought to our attention that slang breaks the base
freeze, because any package linking against slang uploaded to sid
now cannot propagate to sarge because the slang's shlibs have been
bumped. slang 1.4.9dbs-4 and -5 were uploaded on 26 Jul
On 2004-08-12 Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now with gcc resolved this makes sense again, this has been ready for
quite some time.
easy pcsc-lite/1.2.9-beta5-1 muscleframework/1.1.5-4 etoken/0.3.9-2
pcsc-tools/1.3.4-2 opensc/0.8.1-7 xcardii/0.9.9-5
Darn, I missed two packages
On 2004-08-13 Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 10:36:01PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
The following frozen packages need to have updated versions available in
testing:
slang
gnutls11
libgpg-error
You have to add gcc-3.4 to that list. The gcc team
On 2004-08-15 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 03:16:35PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
[...]
And kdelibs-data AGAIN caused file conflicts with
openoffice.org-mimelnk. See
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=265852repeatmerged=no.
Should that be
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:53:26PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I have talked to Bill Yerazunis which is upstream maintainer of crm114
about what version he would like to have in sarge. He wants to have new
version of crm114 in sarge since it includes bugfixes for some long
standing bugs.
On 2004-08-18 Joost van Baal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spamassassin 2.64-1 is not yet built on mipsel, therefore, it's not yet
in sarge. However, 2.64 fixes a security bug, see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-announcem=109168121628767w=2 :
[...]
I'm not sure wether it's
On 2004-08-18 Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I want to
a) verify that libgpvm3 does not have a shared library is indeed
an RC bug.
[...]
Afaict it is not.
8.3 Static libraries
[...]
In some cases, it is acceptable for a library to be available in static form
only; these
easy moagg/0.13-1 moagg-data/0.13-1
easy nvidia-modules-i386/1.0.6111+1 nvidia-graphics-drivers/1.0.6111-1
Anything else I looked at had either too young, not yet build, or was
buggy.
hth, cu andreas
--
See, I told you they'd listen to Reason, [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja
On 2004-08-21 Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it looks that libiodbc2 arm binaries need to be uploaded. they are
required for the qt-x11-free build to happen (qt-x11-freeis is Dep-Wait
on arm because of this).
[...]
The build was not successful, although it seemed to be at first
Package: debootstrap
Version: 0.2.41-0.2
Severity: normal
Hello,
One of sarge's goals was to try to get rid of libgnutls10 and use
libgnutls11 instead. However debootstrap does not install it for sarge
and therefore exim4 cannot switch.
Afaict all that is needed is
s/libgnutls10 /libgnutls10
On 2004-08-27 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 09:39:59AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Package: debootstrap
[...]
One of sarge's goals was to try to get rid of libgnutls10 and use
libgnutls11 instead. However debootstrap does not install it for sarge
On 2004-08-09 Brendan O'Dea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:19:24PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
I am curently preparing an autobuildable package of perl for sarge.
The current version (5.8.4-2) required handholding and local patching
on ia64, arm and m68k which would make
On 2004-08-31 Martin Waitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:30:20AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
No, qt needs to be in sync on all architectures first. Currently, we're
only waiting on an upload of the m68k build.
Does anyone know what's the matter with the arm build?
On 2004-08-29 Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2004-08-09 Brendan O'Dea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:19:24PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
http://www.logic.univie.ac.at/~ametzler/debian/NMU/perl_5.8.4-2.1.NMU.diff
All this has happened almost three
On 2004-09-03 Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest postgresql-plruby package does not build on ia64 because the
configuration script hangs indefinitely until the buildd kills it. I
have asked around for help, but so far without success. Assuming that
no fix for this
Hello,
Now that doko has built motv for arm openmotif can go in.
easy openmotif/2.2.3-1 motv/3.94-1
cu andreas
On 2004-09-05 Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Why has arm not built a new version of qt3? It's been attempted several
times over the last week; each time, the build log ends with this:
[...]
Build killed with signal 15 after 499 minutes of inactivity
As far as I can tell,
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 02:50:30PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
as i'd like to follow the discussion. Is there any reason
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/09/threads.htm isn't being
updated anymore since yesterday?
master.debian.org ran out of diskspace. It will be fixed
soon, for
Hello,
Afaict the NMU to make perl autobuildable was successful and I think
it should be pushed into testing (perhaps not immediately, but I'd
rather note it now than forget it).
Problem: The perl as shipped in the 5.8.4-2 source-package will not
build on arm, ia64 and hppa.
Build report for
convertfs seems to be severly broken, two rc-bugs, one of them
http://bugs.debian.org/238246
diagnosed properly and leading to data loss.
I suggest to not ship it in testing in its current status, ccing the
maintainer for confirmation.
cu andreas
--
See, I told you they'd
On 2004-09-16 Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know why these packages are not yet built on all arches
in t-p-u?
aptitude | 0.2.15.6-0.sarge5 | testing-proposed-updates | source, arm,
hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
Missing alpha and mips builds
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 02:06:52PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Matthias Urlichs has already filed bugs against packages that
still depend on gnutls7 and gnutls10 and their libgcrypt
counterparts. I noticed that libphone, which is close to transition
from sid, depends on gnutls10 for i386.
Hello,
exim4 4.34-7 is up to date on all architectures and closes all l10n
related bugs.
There'll soon be a -8, which also is targeted for sarge via sid,
however its changes will be a *little* bit more interesting, therefore
I'll want -8 to simmer a little bit longer in sid and would like the
Hello,
exim4-4.38 features minimal changes over 4.34-7 and closes a rc bug on
alpha:
--
exim4 (4.34-8) unstable; urgency=medium
* The real-life-takes-its-toll-release.
* Use statvsf() instead of statfs(), fixing complete breakage on
alpha/ReiserFS (Closes: #280213). Thanks to
Hello,
--
findutils (4.1.20-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Chuan-kai Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] has offered to serve as backup
maintainer. Thanks. Add him to Uploaders.
* xargs now works even if the environment is larger than 20KB.
(Closes: #176201)
--
The bug
Hello,
I was checking up on wmaker's status re sarge migration, and while I was
at it, chose to mail it here.
The new wmaker brings a new libwraster, libwraster3 instead of
libwraster2. That in itself would be easily doable in short time, as
there are only 4 other packages linking[1] against it
On 2004-12-04 Jeff Teunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
I do not know what the best course of action is, there are 3
alternatives afaict:
1) tempoarily remove wsoundserver and wsoundprefs from sarge to let
wmaker in.
2) Quickly upload a new version
On 2004-12-09 Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'd like to drop compatibility packages libcurl2 and libcurl2-dev
from curl.
[...]
transition to libcurl3 started months ago and many packages (i think the
most important ones i.e. openoffice and php4) has been already updated.
some
Hello,
We've discussed this on IRC and I think I have since found the
solution, hinting a couple of locale packages together is necessary:
easy mozilla-thunderbird/0.9-6 enigmail/2:0.89.0-1
mozilla-thunderbird-locale-nl/0.9.dfsg-1 mozilla-thunderbird-locale-ca/0.9-1
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 02:20:45PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Frank Küster writes:
gcc-3.4 (3.4.3-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Updated to gcc-3.4 CVS 20041215.
-- Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:54:45 +
[...]
I would be glad if you would consider a
On 2005-01-18 Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
diffutils (2.8.1-8) unstable; urgency=low
* Repackaged source without the GFDL-covered manual. Closes: #212523.
[...]
[ The new diff-doc package is in preparation and almost ready, there
is a preliminary version in my home page at
On 2005-09-26 Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 02:32:56PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
mkdir -p debian/tmp/usr/bin
cd $(dirname $(find -name lamclean -perm +u+x -type f
[...]
On 2005-10-17 Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Debian Sarge we had libmysqlclient12 from MySQL 4.0.x as main mysql library
in use.
[...]
Maintainers:
Recompiling with build-deps set to libmysqlclient14-dev instead of
libmysqlclient12-dev should be enough.
[...]
How about
|
On 2005-12-03 Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
It's been a while since the last update: how long to go before r1?
Dunno.
Ryan (ftpmaster) won't give a green light for r1 until the kernel
has been updated.
On 2006-03-25 Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
However, I don't immediately understand why the auto* tools are being
invoked by make during this build?
[...]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ lsdiff -z tar_1.14-2.1.diff.gz | \
egrep -v '/debian/|/src/'
On 2006-03-28 sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i got a grave bug reported against nagios recently (#359637), because
nagios is no longer installable in unstable. it looks like
someone's bin-NMU'd it on 2006/03/20, along with the other
arch:any packages.
my best guess is that this has to
On 2006-04-17 Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 09:59:55PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 12:29:04AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
For sarge updates of the linux kernels, grub needs to be updated before
linux-image*. Can this be forced by an
On 2006-04-17 Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 12:09:27PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
kernel-package 10 uses debconf for the user communication. This
includes the pre and post scripts specified in /etc/kernel-img.conf.
update-grub from grub older than 0.97-3
Hej,
The recently released mozilla 1.7.13 is supposed to be the last
release of the mozilla suite.
http://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2006/04/12/sunset-announcement-for-fxtb-10x-and-mozilla-suite-17x/
| These releases will include the final set of official security and
| stability
On 2006-04-23 Alexander E. Patrakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Metzler wrote:
The recently released mozilla 1.7.13 is supposed to be the last
release of the mozilla suite.
I suppose that seamonkey has to be packaged instead. Is this task assigned
to anybody?
Debian is volunteer
+
+ * Fix occasional SSL connection setup error. Closes:#325971
+
+ -- Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 5 Jun 2006 12:28:19 +0200
+
gnutls11 (1.0.16-13.2) stable-security; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- gnutls11-1.0.16.orig/lib
On 2006-06-06 Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 01:04:09PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
#325971 is still open in sarge, Matthias tried to fix it in
1.0.16-13.1sarge1 but the upload was rejected for 3.1r1 because the
diff was not clean.
I have rectified
tags 325971 pending
thanks
On 2006-06-06 Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 01:04:09PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
I have rectified this and produced 1.0.16-13.2sarge1 based on the
security upload 1.0.16-13.2. Patch attached. - Would it be ok for me
On 2006-06-11 Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-06-06 Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 01:04:09PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
Would it be ok for me to upload this?
/me puts his SRMa hat on
That's ok, the patch is pretty clean and short
Hej,
could you trigger BinNMUs for the following library packages as they are
still linking against libtasn1-2?
sword (dependency pulled in from libcurl3-gnutls-dev which has
switched some time ago)
libgnomesu0 (afaict dependency pulled in via libgnomevfs2-0)
Both are binNMU safe afaict.
cu
Hej,
still trying to get rid of libtasn1-2 and gnutls11 I have stumbled upon
packages that only depend on these packages on i386. I could fix these
by simply making a binary NMU. However I am not sure whether this is
still allowed nowadays or whether binary NMUs should only be triggered
by
On 2006-07-22 Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-07-20 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 11:02:49AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
could you trigger BinNMUs for the following library packages as they are
still linking against libtasn1-2?
sword
On 2006-07-31 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 10:36:24AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2006-07-20 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 11:02:49AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
Could you please schedule a +b2 binNMU for amd64
On 2006-08-03 Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
In which form would I need to provide NMU requests to generate as
little work for you as possible?
[...]
gsasl (amd64 and s390 +b1, all archs except s390 need a rebuild.)
---
wanna-build -b amd64
Hello,
libgnomesu 0.9.5-3 initialy FTBFS to temporary uninstallable
build-depends and when vorlon re-scheduled on july 31st it suffered
the same fate as the directfb transition temporarily wreaked havoc.
Please rerescedule it. Thanks.
cu and- release goal: Only one version of gnutls in etch
On 2006-08-10 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:05:22PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
libgnomesu 0.9.5-3 initialy FTBFS to temporary uninstallable
build-depends and when vorlon re-scheduled on july 31st it suffered
the same fate as the directfb transition
On 2006-08-10 Stefan Huehner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~he/base-freeze-packages
Looking at this is noticed some packages which are priority 'important'
at the moment but this doesn't seem right any more:
a.) libgnutls11
b.) libtasn1-2
c.)
On 2006-08-11 Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I plan to upload a group of changes to grub and grub-installer to
move update-grub and grub-install to /usr/sbin/.
For this to happen, my transition plan is described bellow:
- A new grub package would be uploaded to unstable having a
Hej,
please schedule the following binNMUs to relink the packages against
gnutls13:
centericq_4.21.0-11, rebuild against gnutls13, 1, i386 arm alpha amd64 hppa
ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
bibletime_1.5.3-1, rebuild against gnutls13, 1, alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k
mips mipsel
Hello,
now that libgnomesu has been built and uploaded on ARM further binNMUs
to get rid of gnutls11/libtasn1-2 can be triggered.
gst-editor_0.8.0-1, rebuilt against gnutls13, 1, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386,
i386, ia64, kfreebsd-i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc
cupsys-pt_1.2.4-3,
Hello,
Please schedule the following binNMUs for packages that are linking
against libtasn1-2 instead of libtasn1-3:
---
[package]_[source-version], [reason], [binNMU number], [list of archs]
firestarter_1.0.3-1.2, get rid of dependency on obsolete libtasn1-2, 1, alpha
hppa
1 - 100 of 427 matches
Mail list logo
