Hi,
[No offence, just checking]
I was wondering if there can be a response to how likely it is that
cacti can get a unblock to fix bug 681558 [1]. Are the procedure
followed correctly, or did I something wrong? Or do I just need to wait
longer? Upload to experimental maybe?
As Ubuntu is about
On 10-10-12 21:41, Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi,
sorry for the very late answer.
No problem.
+If you read this and care about keeping your system maintainable, please
change
+the layout of the plugins structure of cacti. Due to the way a lot of
plug-ins
+are written (details in bug
On 10-10-12 21:41, Julien Cristau wrote:
Moving things away from /usr/share/cacti/site/plugins manually means any
update to the package won't be effective. Is there really no better way
of handling this?
And one more thing related to the unblock request, just in case it was
not clear already.
handling of /var/run/lastfm life cycle (Closes: #689896).
+
+ [ Paul Gevers ]
+ * Prepare upload
+
+ -- Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:19:02 +0200
+
lastfmsubmitd (1.0.6-3) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
diff -u lastfmsubmitd-1.0.6/debian/lastfmsubmitd.postinst
Hi release team,
There has been a small discussion about dash RC bugs 538822 and 540512
in the bts and the general idea is to postpone the proper fix (again)
till after the release. Do you agree, and if so, can you tag this bug
appropriate as wheezy-ignore? If you do, these bugs should again
and removed in 5.12 (closes: #692342)
+
+ -- Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:41:39 +0100
+
apt-move (4.2.27-2) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
diff -Nru apt-move-4.2.27/debian/patches/fix_perl_implicit_split_deprecation.patch apt-move-4.2.27/debian/patches
On 09-11-12 13:17, intrigeri wrote:
I think the code would be a bit more robust / future-proof if it
localized @_ before assigning to it. Paul, what do you think?
I am nearly hopeless in perl. So if you have a more robust solution, I
am 100% in favor.
I just tried to get rid of a QA RC bug (I
On 11-10-12 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 10-10-12 21:41, Julien Cristau wrote:
Moving things away from /usr/share/cacti/site/plugins manually means any
update to the package won't be effective. Is there really no better way
of handling this?
And one more thing related to the unblock
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Gnuspool has RC bug 664754 standing against it (removal of gnuspool makes files
disappear from lpr). As this package has never been released in
Hi release team,
Cacti has a nearly 5 months old standing RC bug [1] filed against it
about files with a non-DFSG license (distribution is possible, but
others can not use the copy for other purposes, they need to get their
own free copy). I was hoping that cacti upstream would create the code
address to elb...@debian.org
+
+ -- Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org Wed, 01 Aug 2012 22:32:32 +0200
+
cacti (0.8.8a-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Update postrm with new debconf answers (Closes: #673764)
diff -Nru cacti-0.8.8a/debian/control cacti-0.8.8a/debian/control
--- cacti-0.8.8a/debian
Dear Debian Release Team,
As part of my NM process, I am asking you how I could request an
override for the urgency set in one of my uploads, as it is my
understanding that *you* can override them. It is my intent to document
this fact, with the proper procedure, in the developers-reference,
Hi KiBi,
On 25-06-12 21:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I am asking you how I could request an override for the urgency set
in one of my uploads, as it is my understanding that *you* can
override them. It is my intent to document this fact, with the
proper procedure, in the developers-reference,
-release@l.d.o was still in
your queue and this is a duplicate.
Paul
On 25-11-12 13:53, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi release team,
Cacti has a nearly 5 months old standing RC bug [1] filed against it
about files with a non-DFSG license (distribution is possible, but
others can not use the copy
Hi Abou,
On 17-12-12 14:36, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package fpc.
This upload is fixing an important bugs#686038 to allow translating user
targeted question upon installation.
The respective dsc file can be found
Hi RT,
Just one note to make it perfectly clear, except for the typo change in
d/copyright, all changes that went into fpc/2.6.0-7 are the result of a
change initiated and reviewed by debian-i18n.
Paul
P.S. Abou mistook me for Peter Green, one of his regular sponsors of
fpc, but I did the
Hi,
I am touching on this bug as part of the request by the RT [1].
Reading through the discussion of a later CVE bug in bind9 [2], my
expectation regarding the unblock bind9/1:9.8.4.dfsg-1 request is that
the answer will be no, due to:
And then we're talking about a version that does this
Hi,
I am touching on this bug as part of the request by the RT [1].
Some remarks:
- The package is in unstable now.
- The debdiff in the first message is the same as created from the
archive by debdiff packagekit_0.7.6-1.dsc packagekit_0.7.6-2.dsc
- It would be good to mention bug numbers
Hi,
I am touching on this bug as part of the request by the RT [1].
Some remarks:
- I suggest explaining in more detail why this version of the package
deserves a freeze exception [2]. I don't see any RC or important bugs
fixed, or release goals achieved, so I DON'T expect the RT to grant
(Closes: Bug#697350)
+
+ -- Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:02:39 +0100
+
ebook-speaker (2.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Samuel Thibault ]
diff -Nru ebook-speaker-2.0/debian/patches/mbrola.patch ebook-speaker-2.0/debian/patches/mbrola.patch
--- ebook-speaker-2.0/debian/patches
Hi,
On 12-12-12 22:02, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 10-12-12 10:02, Niels Thykier wrote:
I'd recommend uploading 4) to experimental, compile a debdiff and send
it our way. We may have to back down 3) or 1) once we see the debdiff, but
I have just uploaded cacti version 0.8.8a+dfsg-1
-error-message-hardening-format-security.patch to use
+strcpy i.s.o. sprintf and properly format string.
+
+ -- Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:36:38 +0100
+
+openmotif (2.3.3-6) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * QA upload.
+- Set maintainer to QA group
+ * Allow multiarch (Closes
On 22-01-13 15:21, Niels Thykier wrote:
Openmotif 2.3.3-7 is an update to 2.3.3-5 to allow two release goals:
- code hardening
This does not appear to close a bug and therefore, I presume, is there
for not on the target list for Wheezy? If it is not on this list,
then I would prefer to
bug #698661) to allow for transition to Wheezy.
+
+ -- Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:52:01 +0100
+
+openmotif (2.3.3-7) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * QA upload.
+ * Improve 0005-sprintf-error-message-hardening-format-security.patch to use
+strcpy i.s.o. sprintf and properly
:50.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+cacti (0.8.8a+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Upload to unstable after acknowledge by the RT, see #694850.
+
+ -- Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:41:05 +0100
+
cacti (0.8.8a+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=low
* Removed non-dfsg-free
=low
+
+ * Fixed typo in recommends libjs-jquery* i.s.o. libjs-query
+
+ -- Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:33:20 +0100
+
cacti (0.8.8a+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Upload to unstable after acknowledge by the RT, see #694850.
diff -Nru cacti-0.8.8a+dfsg/debian/control
On 19-02-13 23:21, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
It's a regression and a trivial fix, so you can go ahead with this change.
Please ping this bug when it's uploaded.
Ping.
(Only difference with the previous debdiff, is that I now had a bug
number [1] to close).
Paul
[1]
On 03-04-13 01:08, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:03:09AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
I have attached the debdiff between version 3 currently in Wheezy and
version 4, now in unstable.
Being a regression and, if I understand correctly from others, rather
awkward for users
(disclaimer: I am not part of the release team).
On 05-04-13 06:50, Jordi Mallach wrote:
Additionally, it marks the package as MA: foreign. SVN also had two
old commits that add a missing pre-dependency on dpkg, and remove
redundant dirs from debian/alsa-base.dirs. If these two old commits
On 11-04-13 19:00, Niels Thykier wrote:
As I approved of the changed that let to this regression, I would like
to see this mess cleaned up before r0 if possible. :)
Good to hear.
Paul, seeing some users are surprised that the folding is broken on
upgrades[1], would it be possible to add a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package fpc
Version 2.6.0-8 fixes bug 704252 where it was reported that the package
change the debian/control file during
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package fpc
Version 2.6.0-9 fixes bug 704252 where it was reported that the package
change the debian/control file during
[disclaimer: I am not part of the release team]
On 18-04-13 19:09, Mateusz Łukasik wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package evilwm.
This upload fixed all bugs version which is avaitable
Hi Pino,
[Disclaimer: I am not part of the release-team]
On 14-04-13 13:16, Pino Toscano wrote:
while reviewing copyright for newer versions of kdesdk, we found out
that one of the files, scripts/add_trace.pl, has an unclear license:
| ## Written by David Faure fa...@kde.org, licensed under
Hi Roberto,
[Disclaimer: I am not a member of the release team]
On 15-04-13 16:59, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
[Please CC me, I am not subscribed to the list]
Done.
It has been brought to my attention that the Wheezy version of the
shorewall package contains a bug for users with a multi-ISP
Hi Roberto,
I forgot one thing in my previous e-mail.
Please check the freeze policy:
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi release team,
I like to get your opinion and advise on the following.
Motif has been released with a free license last year, and I would like
to move it from non-free (called openmotif) to Debian main. Its former
free replacement lesstif2 is unsupported upstream and should be retired
(in
[Disclaimer: I am not part of the release team]
On 07-05-13 17:59, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
What are my chances of that happening? Also, should I upload again, or
can the version that's currently in unstable be moved/copied to
stable(-proposed-updates) without problem?
As far as I understand
Hi RT,
On 06-05-13 23:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
So my question basically is, what would be the most appropriate order to
do things?
My proposal would be (with your approval) to just get motif into
unstable/main and start converting the dependencies with the help of
their maintainers
on
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2013/05/msg00161.html
or 51881a33.6030...@debian.org
I like to request a transition slot for lesstif2 to (open)motif.
To keep current unstable build-able and installable, I propose the
follow transition path:
On 07-05-13 21:32, Paul Gevers wrote
[Disclaimer: I am not a member of the release team]
Hi Joachim,
On 22-05-13 12:53, Joachim Breitner wrote:
The fix is uploaded to unstable, and the debdiff attached.
Just a note on your debdiff. It contains several spurious differences
(e.g. .git-dpm and refreshed patches without code
[Summary of previous mails: we are discussing how/when to move openmotif
to motif].
On 23-05-13 08:43, Luca Falavigna wrote:
2013/5/22 Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org:
Ok. Then we just have to wait until the RT grants us a transition slot.
Will keep you updated.
I don't think we need
[Disclaimer: I am not part of the release team]
On 30-05-13 17:19, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
Nevertheless, according to my calculations, a new stable release
happened every 20 days on average for the current stable (3.x) branch.
In order to be useful and provide good web browsing experience,
Hi Daniel,
[Disclaimer: I am not part of the release team]
On 09-05-13 23:49, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
The size of the changeset between 0.12.3 and 0.12.5 is unfortunately
large, but this is mainly for two reasons:
Probably this sentence is part of the reason why you haven't had any
On 04-06-13 08:31, Julien Cristau wrote:
Do we know how many of the lesstif2 reverse dependencies are libraries
whose ABI would change if rebuilt with motif instead?
No, but I can try to find out. The original idea of lesstif was to be a
binary compatible replacement, but I don't know how well
On 09-06-13 11:05, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 04-06-13 08:31, Julien Cristau wrote:
Do we know how many of the lesstif2 reverse dependencies are libraries
whose ABI would change if rebuilt with motif instead?
No, but I can try to find out. The original idea of lesstif was to be a
binary
On 10-06-13 22:32, Paul Gevers wrote:
My findings:
via (include/via.h): no diff
xmhtml (include/XmHTML/XmHTML.h): ABI/API is not compatible
I did not succeed with the others yet for different reasons.
dx: I fail to configure it (not understood yet)
dx: (include/dx/dx.h after debian/rules
Hi Nicholas, Graham,
On 02-07-13 20:33, Nicholas Breen wrote:
Yes, transitioning xbae to openmotif without also transitioning its
dependencies does break things - grace won't even start up in that state.
Very good to know, therefore cc'ed to bug 708462. (Oops, somehow I
missed xbae, in my
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 719542 = pu
tags 719542 + wheezy
retitle 719542 pu: nmap/6.00-0.3+deb7u1
thanks
[Disclaimer: I am not part of the release team]
On 12-08-13 23:44, Hilko Bengen wrote:
I'd like to upload a security update for nmap to stable. Please see
libxbae in unstable instead of the motif-built libxbae in
experimental.
On 6 August 2013 20:49, Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org
mailto:elb...@debian.org wrote:
@Graham. That would mean a (small) transition (distinct from the motif
pne). Please ALWAYS coordinate transitions
On 25-08-13 09:48, Nicholas Breen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 03:06:06PM +0800, Lifeng Sun wrote:
If the packages build neatly, and someone's checked that whatever element of
paw that has a Motif GUI doesn't break with xbae 4.60.4-4, then we're set.
I'll upload the Motif builds of xbae and
On 11-09-13 21:57, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[dropped the unneeded -release CC]
Hmm, that was added by the bts, wasn't it? I sent the mail to the bug,
albeit only in CC (no TO).
The is_affected criterion looks like it wants s/depends/build-depends/g;
I've applied that change to the ben file.
ben file:
title = motif;
is_affected = .depends ~ lesstif2-dev | .depends ~ libmotif-dev;
is_good = .depends ~ libxm4 | .depends ~ libmrm4 | .depends ~ libuil4;
is_bad = .depends ~ lesstif2;
I submitted this ben file some time ago, and I am glad to see it on the
transition tracker [1]. I
[disclaimer: I am not part of the release team]
On 15-09-13 08:08, Charles Plessy wrote:
I uploaded a fixed version to proposed-updates.
You are supposed to wait for an ACK from the RT.
I could not find the latest instructions for stable updates, but I note that
there are no [SRU] emails on
Hi Adam,
On 01-10-13 00:54, Adam Borowski wrote:
* user-accessible interfaces (GUI, stdin, stdout, stderr, command line,
reading/writing plain-text files) should be able to pass through UTF-8
data uncorrupted, by default
* UTF-8 should be properly displayed
I am wondering who is going to
[Disclaimer: I am not part of the release team]
On 09-11-13 04:49, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I wonder why the package aspect++ does not migrate. According to
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=aspectc++, it
seems to be because of missing arm builds. I expected that not to
Hi all,
Although from the testing/jessie point of view the transition is not
finished yet, lesstif2 is removed from unstable.
I understand that lesstif2 is removed from testing when no (binary)
packages depend on it anymore. As the removal has not happened
automatically, what can I do to help
On 14-12-13 12:42, Julien Cristau wrote:
Removing lesstif2 would make grass, grass-gui, gridengine-qmon,
libvia-dev, libvia2, via-bin uninstallable. grass is blocked by
#728150. gridengine needs a few more days. via is blocked by #724021.
Thanks for verifying. Working on Grass right now
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
With permission of the current maintainer of dotconf, I like to update
the dotconf package as it is a requirement for the new version of
Control: block -1 by 733919
Control: block -1 by 733920
On 31-12-13 15:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
I like to update the dotconf package
The package is in experimental now.
mysqmail/speechd-up need sourceful uploads as they have a hardcoded
dependency on
libdotconf1.0
Bugs filed at [1] and [2
On 02-01-14 09:05, Paul Gevers wrote:
mysqmail/speechd-up need sourceful uploads as they have a hardcoded
dependency on
libdotconf1.0
speechd-up is fixed and can be bin-NMUed [2]. For mysqmail I got
permission to do the trivial NMU when needed, see [1]. So we are all set
for this small
Hi Gianfranco,
[Disclaimer: I am not part of the release team]
The release team keeps track of these kind of request by use of the bts.
Please file a bug (with the content below) against the pseudo-package
release.debian.org. Bonus if you use the template provided by the
reportbug command line
On 04-01-14 07:44, Paul Gevers wrote:
speechd-up is fixed and can be bin-NMUed [2]. For mysqmail I got
permission to do the trivial NMU when needed, see [1]. So we are all set
for this small transition without current transition mixes from my side.
Ping...
For the record, mysqmail does
Hi,
I am sure I would have received an confirmed message, but he
On 13-02-14 21:24, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
forwarded 733740 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libdotconf0.html
So now dotconf has a transition tracker. What is the estimated time that
this transition can
On 15-02-14 11:00, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:21:03 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
There's no ETA. But not before the blocking bugs are fixed.
Oh, if that is what you are waiting for, I will upload the NMU nearly
immediately. I thought it would be clear that I had permission
On 16-03-14 19:33, Julien Cristau wrote:
Feel free to upload. Let us know when it's installed on all archs so we
can schedule binNMUs.
Uploaded (all) and installed on all -2 arches. Feel free to binNMU
when finally armel and mipsel install:
cpm
mysqmail
sbox-dtc
I want to revert a patch
On 16-03-14 21:50, Julien Cristau wrote:
Uploaded (all) and installed on all -2 arches. Feel free to binNMU
when finally armel and mipsel install:
cpm
mysqmail
sbox-dtc
Scheduled with a dep-wait.
And build/uploaded/installed everywhere.
I want to revert a patch applied in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Could please you schedule an binNMU of Lazarus?
nmu lazarus_1.2+dfsg-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against fpc 2.6.4+dfsg-1
Lazarus is the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi RT,
It seems to me that lazarus needs some help to migrate to testing.
We moved a package from arch all to arch any and now migration is
blocked because some architectures are not able to build the
On 03-05-14 17:27, Paul Gevers wrote:
Or did I miss something and should I do something on my side?
Actually, it should be waiting on fpc to migrate now I think of it, via
depends on fpc-abi-2.6.4. Is this maybe just not shown? And while
investigating, I notice that amd64 and powerpc have been
Hi,
Can somebody with more knowledge of Britney than I have (easy, I don't
have any) please tell me why lazarus is not migration although the
needed 5 days are over? Is it because some binaries (arch:all) got
renamed and decrufting scripts only pick this up after 10 days?
Paul
signature.asc
On 27-05-14 15:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Aside from
lazarus itself, doing so would break optgeo, which has a
build-dependency on lazarus-ide-1.2.
Is there any reason why this isn't shown in the excuses on the
packages.qa page? Usually these kind of dependencies are shown, aren't they?
Just to keep this bug up-to-date of the status. [Should have done that
earlier]
On 24-05-14 18:04, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Please upload to experimental so that it can go through NEW.
We found a copyright/license unclarity that we are currently
investigating (and if necessary defining the
On 09-06-14 08:30, Alexander Wirt wrote:
That way you are just wasting other peoples time, buildd time and so on.
If such a policy prevents broken, packages with low quality and so on from
being uploaded I am happy with it. And to just test some binarys, you don't
have to be an expert.
In the
On 07-06-14 11:32, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 24-05-14 18:04, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Please upload to experimental so that it can go through NEW.
The upload has happened and the package was excepted. Please let us know
when we can proceed with uploading xmhtml and grace.
Paul
On 03-07-14 18:44, Yavor Doganov wrote:
I'll ping you when the new core packages pass through NEW, OK?
I don't see gnustep-gui 0.24 in NEW or in the archive. Was that ever
uploaded? How are things looking here?
No, unfortunately nobody volunteered to sponsor them [2] yet... My
past
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: 767...@bugs.debian.org
Hi Release team,
In my effort to fix RC bug 720517 in dbconfig-common via NMU (which
migrated to Jessie some days ago), I introduced a quite similar
On 31-10-14 12:35, Dominik George wrote:
I think this patch doesn't work when installing a new package (it does
work on upgrades). So I think the two added lines need to be within an
'if [ -e $outputfile ] ; then' statement.
I figured that and re-created the patch - apparently, I uploaded
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
[Disclaimer: I am not a member of the release team]
On 04-11-14 15:54, Richard Nelson wrote:
(include/attach the debdiff against the package in testing)
You forgot to attach the debdiff.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix regression introduced in the previous upload, now really
+preserve permissions during upgrade, thanks to Simon Bruder for
+reporting and Dominik George for helping triage. (Closes: #767248)
+
+ -- Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org Sun, 02 Nov 2014 19:19:40 +0100
.
+ * Document missing license (Closes: #760377)
+ * Clean unused code to prevent conflicting licenses
+ * Add ${shlibs:Depends} to depends of xmlrpc-api-utils to prevent
+several missing dependencies (Thanks lintian)
+
+ -- Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org Sat, 08 Nov 2014 20:53:51 +0100
On 14-11-14 13:15, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Niels unblocked this yesterday.
Oops, sorry. I forgot to check the actual hints. Didn't expected that
these things would already be actively found by the RT.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Disclaimer: I am no part of the release team]
On 30-11-14 08:12, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
Are we still releasing updates to oldstable? Should I prepare a similar
fix there?
We (for some value of we) are. Please have a look at
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development (and
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package speech-dispatcher
The latest upload of speech-dispatcher to sid fixes a (minor) security
issue (CVE-2014-1724). On
Summary: The current upstream version of pacemaker should not have
migrated to jessie because it build-dependency (and corresponding
dependency library) is not high enough in jessie. Either pacemaker
should be removed from jessie, or libqb in sid should be allowed to
migrate (after removal of the
On 17-02-15 10:27, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Tags: confirmed
Le 2015-02-13 13:48, Paul Gevers a écrit :
In order to fix bug 777622, I prepared a repacked tar ball and the
attached
changes to the packaging of Lazarus. I completely stripped the
lcl/interfaces/carbon directory from the tar ball
+which is considered non-DFSG (Closes: #777622)
+ * Add patch to also not clean the carbon dir in the relevant Makefiles
+ * Add note to d/copyright that we also strip carbon
+
+ -- Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:14:23 +0100
+
lazarus (1.2.4+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency
Hi all,
All the builds of motif failed [1] due to a missing symbol. What are we
going to do? I saw that Graham already choose to just remove the symbol
from the Ubuntu package. I believe that this is really a no-no,
especially without careful investigation if other packages are using
this symbol
On 16-04-15 07:31, Graham Inggs wrote:
If you uploaded 2.3.4-6.2 now, could it cause any harm? At least this
will get the package built and Release Team can still decide whether
to grant the unblock request or not.
I uploaded the package 2.3.4-8 (I couldn't call it a NMU ;) about an
hour ago
Hi
On 12-08-15 09:26, Julien Cristau wrote:
Ok, let's go ahead with this; feel free to upload to jessie.
Just did so.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:02:11 +0100 Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote:
> I will start to work on a proper debdiff, but I appreciate it to know if I
> should include the fixing of existing files in it.
Due to lack of a response, which I expect is due to the lack of a
debdiff,
Hi
On 04-12-15 11:54, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:02:11 +0100 Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote:
>> I will start to work on a proper debdiff, but I appreciate it to know if I
>> should include the fixing of existing files in it.
>
> Due to lack of
Hi,
On 01-01-16 18:36, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> It looks like the fix for existing permissions isn't in the unstable
> package?
Correct. But it is in the NEW queue [1] for nearly two weeks. Because it
doesn't seem to move there and because there are other issues in
dbconfig-common that I worked
control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 02-01-16 20:07, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Can be done. Let me work on a proposal.
Please find attached my renewed proposal. I must admit that I didn't
know exactly how to express "greater than any version that is after the
largest wheezy point release". I su
when upgrading
+from versions before this one (but not from versions after squeeze's
+lts update).
+
+ -- Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:14:55 +0100
+
dbconfig-common (1.8.47+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru dbconfig-common-
I had the versioning scheme for LTS wrong. I'll update the version in
the comment to 1.8.46+squeeze.1 + change the version in the dpkg
comparison for wheezy to 1.8.46+squeeze.99.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tags 808282 patch
retitle 808282 wheezy-pu: package dbconfig-common/1.8.47+nmu1+deb7u1
tags 806247 patch
retitle 806247 jessie-pu: package dbconfig-common/1.8.47+nmu3+deb8u1
thanks
On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 11:54:24 +0100 Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote:
> Please find attached my pro
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Stable Release Managers,
I come to you with this request after discussion with the security
team. Because the issue I
Simon Ruderich
+(Closes: #805638)
+ * Repair permissions of already created backups, but only when upgrading
+from versions before this one (but not from versions after squeeze's
+lts update).
+
+ -- Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:14:55 +0100
+
dbconfig-
On 14-01-16 21:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> "1.8.47+nmu1+deb8u1~" (or +deb8u0 I guess) should work in practice
> afaict.
>
> Please go ahead.
Uploaded with 1.8.47+nmu1+deb8u1~.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1 - 100 of 1458 matches
Mail list logo
