Hi,
On 21/12/2023 09:41, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Is it ok to call upgrade scenarios failures that cannot be reproduced
using apt unsupported until we no longer deal with aliasing?
I incline towards "no"; if an upgrade has failed part-way (as does
happen), people may then reasonably use dpkg
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pcre2
This was uploaded a while ago, but was stuck because of #1027952 which
it turns out was in fact a bug in link-grammar. I'd quite like to see
version 10.42 in
=medium
+
+ * Backport upstream fixes for CVE-2022-1586 CVE-2022-1587
+(Closes: #1011954)
+
+ -- Matthew Vernon Sun, 21 Aug 2022 12:15:50 +0100
+
pcre2 (10.36-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Upload to unstable
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- pcre2-10.36.orig/ChangeLog
+++ pcre2-10.36
for CVE-2022-1586 CVE-2022-1587
+(Closes: #1011954)
+
+ -- Matthew Vernon Sun, 21 Aug 2022 12:15:50 +0100
+
pcre2 (10.36-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Upload to unstable
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- pcre2-10.36.orig/ChangeLog
+++ pcre2-10.36/ChangeLog
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
Change Log
Hi,
I have uploaded bible-kjv 4.34+deb11u1 for bullseye in the light of the
announced forthcoming stable point release. I hope this is in order :)
Regards,
Matthew
On 15/03/2022 14:35, Matthew Vernon wrote:
Hi,
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
The next point release for "bullseye" (11.3) is scheduled for Saturday,
March 26th. Processing of new uploads into bullseye-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
I opened #1
Hi,
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> The next point release for "bullseye" (11.3) is scheduled for Saturday,
> March 26th. Processing of new uploads into bullseye-proposed-updates
> will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
I opened #1005868 about a month ago (following the advice to ask first
+bible-kjv (4.34+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium
+
+ * Fix off-by-one-error in search (Closes: #1005856)
+
+ -- Matthew Vernon Wed, 16 Feb 2022 11:15:11 +
+
bible-kjv (4.34) unstable; urgency=medium
* Check for error return value
diff -Nru bible-kjv-4.34/makeconc.pl bible-kjv-4.
00
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+bible-kjv (4.34) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Check for error return value
+
+ -- Matthew Vernon Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:36:43 +0100
+
+bible-kjv (4.33) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Make the build not run in parallel
+ * Use bible.rawtext to build concordance (Closes: #991133)
+
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
I write as the trn maintainer.
trn has been removed from unstable and testing, because it is insecure
(see #830294 for the insecurity, #830296 for the removal from
unstable/testing).
I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package src:shibboleth-sp2
This package (which I'm sponsoring on behalf of Ferenc Wagner),
backports the upstream fix for CVE-2015-2684 to 2.5.3. I have just
sponsored a
/debian/changelog
+++ rsbackup-1.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+rsbackup (1.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Patch from Jonathan Wiltshire to use install rather than cp for
+post{inst,rm}, making build less sensitive to source file permissions
+(Closes: #774013)
+
+ -- Matthew Vernon
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Hi,
You added tests/bashisms and tools/t-bashisms in 1.1-3, but didn't mention
them in the changelog. Could you explain this (and remove the moreinfo tag
from this bug once you do).
Huh; they've come from upstream's master branch; they are harmless but
unnecessary.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package rsbackup
Recently (yesterday!), there was an Important bug filed against
rsbackup, that it left stuff behind on --purge. Having a
piuparts-clean archive has been a
/changelog 2012-10-22 21:45:25.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+trn (3.6-23) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * use the shared/news/server debconf template rather than prompting in
+postinst (closes: #688563)
+
+ -- Matthew Vernon matt...@debian.org Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:45:25 +0100
+
trn (3.6-22) unstable
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package electric-fence
Hi,
Sorry for another unblock request, but I've finally got the threading
in electric-fence sorted properly, such that it now builds on all
archs (no
Hi,
I've just uploaded electric-fence 2.2.3. This version just tweaks the
build system a little, which undoes a reversion such that we again pass
-fno-builtin-malloc to gcc, which fixes a FTBFS on many architectures
(gcc mis-optimises without it). I've tested it works on i386 amd64 and
to sarge-proposed-updates?
Regards,
Matthew
--
Matthew Vernon MA VetMB LGSM MRCVS
Farm Animal Epidemiology and Informatics Unit
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge
http://www.cus.cam.ac.uk/~mcv21/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
18 matches
Mail list logo
