Bug#1031587: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#1031587: Handling of the request-tracker4 -> request-tracker5 transition in bookworm

2023-04-24 Thread Andrew Ruthven
Hi folks, > Sorry for the long delay. Myself and, I think, Andrew have been short > on time. Yes, my apologies, I've been very busy the last couple of months. > The transition is basically ready to go, but I've been rethinking the > need > to drop request-tracker4, given it will all be quite

Bug#1031587: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#1031587: Handling of the request-tracker4 -> request-tracker5 transition in bookworm

2023-03-29 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:06:49PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Hi Dominic > > On 2023-02-27 15:50:05 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 04:54:33PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 20-02-2023 13:09, Dominic

Bug#1031587: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#1031587: Handling of the request-tracker4 -> request-tracker5 transition in bookworm

2023-03-20 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Dominic On 2023-02-27 15:50:05 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 04:54:33PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > Hi, > > > > On 20-02-2023 13:09, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > If the release team would be willing to grant an exception to

Bug#1031587: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#1031587: Handling of the request-tracker4 -> request-tracker5 transition in bookworm

2023-02-27 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 04:54:33PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi, > > On 20-02-2023 13:09, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > If the release team would be willing to grant an exception to the policy > > to get this done, we can get this wrapped up inside a week I

Bug#1031587: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#1031587: Handling of the request-tracker4 -> request-tracker5 transition in bookworm

2023-02-23 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, On 20-02-2023 13:09, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: If the release team would be willing to grant an exception to the policy to get this done, we can get this wrapped up inside a week I expect. Can you please confirm that everything is ready to do this? I.e. there

Processed: Re: Bug#1031587: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#1031587: Handling of the request-tracker4 -> request-tracker5 transition in bookworm

2023-02-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #1031587 [release.debian.org] Handling of the request-tracker4 -> request-tracker5 transition in bookworm Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1031587: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031587 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1031587: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#1031587: Handling of the request-tracker4 -> request-tracker5 transition in bookworm

2023-02-20 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 12:12:15AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: Dominic Hargreaves , Debian Request Tracker > Group > Control: block 1030749 by -1 > > https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html#soft > > ... > Dropping or

Bug#1031587: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#1031587: Handling of the request-tracker4 -> request-tracker5 transition in bookworm

2023-02-18 Thread Andrew Ruthven
On Sun, 2023-02-19 at 00:12 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html#soft > > ... > Dropping or adding binary packages to a source package, moving > binaries between source packages or renaming source or binary > packages is no longer allowed. Packages