Re: Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1)

2024-03-30 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 10:28:04AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > We have a suite with some project management capabilities: salsa. Let's > just use it instead of ad-hoc tools. I don't think we have something > better right now? This is now https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-team/xz-2024-incident/

Re: Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1)

2024-03-30 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:59:38PM +0100, Ansgar  wrote: > Should we also reset the archive to some prior state and rebuilt > packages like Ubuntu? Do we need to revert to an earlier date as > vulnerable versions have been uploaded to experimental on 2024-02-01 > (but the earlier version might

Re: Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1)

2024-03-30 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, On 2024-03-29 23:59, Ansgar  wrote: > Hi, > > how should we react to the compromised xz-utils upload? > > Ubuntu is reverting their amd64 binaries to pre-Feb 25 and rebuilding > stuff. > > On Debian side AFAIU currently amd64 buildds are paused and pending > reinstall (plus rotation of

Re: Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1)

2024-03-29 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Ansgar  wrote on 29/03/2024 at 23:59:38+0100: > Hi, > > how should we react to the compromised xz-utils upload? > > Ubuntu is reverting their amd64 binaries to pre-Feb 25 and rebuilding > stuff. > > On Debian side AFAIU currently amd64 buildds are paused and pending > reinstall (plus rotation

Coordinate response to xz-utils (DSA 5649-1)

2024-03-29 Thread Ansgar 
Hi, how should we react to the compromised xz-utils upload? Ubuntu is reverting their amd64 binaries to pre-Feb 25 and rebuilding stuff. On Debian side AFAIU currently amd64 buildds are paused and pending reinstall (plus rotation of key material, both OpenPGP and SSH). People are starting to