Re: Don't ship gnupg1 with bullseye

[dropping pkg-request-tracker-maintainers] On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 09:10:57AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves writes: > > > If it is to stay in Debian indefinitely, I'd suggest we still remove > > libgnupg-perl and drop support from libgnupg-interface-perl[1] and > >

Re: Don't ship gnupg1 with bullseye

Hi, On 02-02-2021 09:54, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > The impression I got from the > release team and Chris Hofstaedtler that request-tracker4 was the only > thing blocking removal. The reason I (with my Release Team member hat on) was trying to figure out what needed to happen to enable removal

Re: Don't ship gnupg1 with bullseye

Dominic Hargreaves writes: > If it is to stay in Debian indefinitely, I'd suggest we still remove > libgnupg-perl and drop support from libgnupg-interface-perl[1] and > libpgp-sign-perl. I'm more comfortable with it being there as a > standalone binary to be invoked by users to read old data

Re: Don't ship gnupg1 with bullseye

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 10:26:55AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 09:45:42AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > > IMnsHO it's a bad idea to remove gnupg1 any time soon. While it > > certainly should not be used for encryption, it's still needed when > > dealing with older

Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Don't ship gnupg1 with bullseye

On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:45, Christoph Biedl said: > IMnsHO it's a bad idea to remove gnupg1 any time soon. While it > certainly should not be used for encryption, it's still needed when > dealing with older keys. Quoting the package description: "It is And first of all with data encrypted to old

Re: Don't ship gnupg1 with bullseye

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 09:45:42AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves wrote... > > > Do the gnupg1 maintainers agree that it should be removed from bullseye? > > IMnsHO it's a bad idea to remove gnupg1 any time soon. While it > certainly should not be used for encryption, it's

Re: Don't ship gnupg1 with bullseye

Hey, On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 08:33 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Checking reverse dependencies... > # Broken Depends: > libgnupg-perl: libgnupg-perl libgnupg-perl only supports GnuPG v1.4 and given it hasn't had a release since 2012 I doubt it will gain support for v2.2. > # Broken

Re: Don't ship gnupg1 with bullseye

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 09:45:42AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves wrote... > > > Do the gnupg1 maintainers agree that it should be removed from bullseye? > > IMnsHO it's a bad idea to remove gnupg1 any time soon. While it > certainly should not be used for encryption, it's

Re: Don't ship gnupg1 with bullseye

Dominic Hargreaves wrote... > Do the gnupg1 maintainers agree that it should be removed from bullseye? IMnsHO it's a bad idea to remove gnupg1 any time soon. While it certainly should not be used for encryption, it's still needed when dealing with older keys. Quoting the package description: "It

Don't ship gnupg1 with bullseye

Hi all, With the upload of request-tracker4 4.4.4+dfsg-1, there are (if is correct) no more runtime dependencies on gnupg1 in unstable. $ ssh mirror.ftp-master.debian.org "dak rm -Rn gnupg1" ... Checking reverse dependencies... #