Bug#1028489: transition: boost1.81
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:23:46PM -0400, David James wrote: > Hi Anton, > > Is there anything I can do to help this transition along? I wish to > package software that does not build on 1.74, but does on 1.81 and 1.82. > If there's anyway I can assist with bumping boost-defaults to 1.81 or 1.82 > I would be happy to help. Note that as a workaround you could temporarily use a non-default boost by build depending on libboost-foo1.81-dev instead of libboost-foo-dev, and then later switch to libboost-foo-dev (>= 1.81) [1] after the defaults change. > Regards, > > David James cu Adrian [1] Build-Depends: libboost-foo-dev (>= 1.81) | libboost-foo1.81-dev would then (*after* the defaults change) be an alternative option to make the package easily backportable since boost1.81 is already in bookworm and even bullseye-backports
Bug#1028489: transition: boost1.81
Hi James, thanks for the offer. At the moment I am preparing 1.83 and will ask for transition soon. Best regards David James schrieb am Mi., 4. Okt. 2023, 20:23: > Hi Anton, > > Is there anything I can do to help this transition along? I wish to > package software that does not build on 1.74, but does on 1.81 and 1.82. > If there's anyway I can assist with bumping boost-defaults to 1.81 or 1.82 > I would be happy to help. > > Regards, > > David James > >
Bug#1028489: transition: boost1.81
Hi Anton, Is there anything I can do to help this transition along? I wish to package software that does not build on 1.74, but does on 1.81 and 1.82. If there's anyway I can assist with bumping boost-defaults to 1.81 or 1.82 I would be happy to help. Regards, David James
Bug#1028489: transition: boost1.81
Hi Sebastian, unfortunately no. I am cosidering though the packaging of 1.82. Let's see. Regards Anton Am Di., 20. Juni 2023 um 00:35 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher : > > Hi Anton > > On 2023-01-30 19:28:37 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > thanks for the information. Let's do it just after release. > > > > Just for the record. The full test rebuild has been done (thanks to Lucas!). > > Results and logs are here: > > > > http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/01/15/ > > Have bugs been filed for the failing builds? > > Cheers > -- > Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1028489: transition: boost1.81
Hi Anton On 2023-01-30 19:28:37 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > thanks for the information. Let's do it just after release. > > Just for the record. The full test rebuild has been done (thanks to Lucas!). > Results and logs are here: > > http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/01/15/ Have bugs been filed for the failing builds? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1028489: transition: boost1.81
Hi, Am 30.01.23 um 19:28 schrieb Anton Gladky: Just for the record. The full test rebuild has been done (thanks to Lucas!). Results and logs are here: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/01/15/ Just for the record: It definitely misses packages. Probably those which build-depend on boost but don't get a runtime dependency on anything boost'ish (because it uses the header parts) (And e.g. libreoffice is #1029104, not libreoffice 1:7.4.4~rc2-2 1:7.4.4~rc2-2 SAMEVER Failed Failed SAMERES 0 0 SAMETIME /bin/sh: 1: git: not found /bin/sh: 1: git: not found which is expected, we don't add the git version into the About box) Regards, Rene
Bug#1028489: transition: boost1.81
Hi Sebastian, thanks for the information. Let's do it just after release. Just for the record. The full test rebuild has been done (thanks to Lucas!). Results and logs are here: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/01/15/ Regards Anton
Processed: Re: Bug#1028489: transition: boost1.81
Processing control commands: > tags -1 trixie moreinfo Bug #1028489 [release.debian.org] transition: boost1.81 Added tag(s) moreinfo and trixie. -- 1028489: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028489 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1028489: transition: boost1.81
Control: tags -1 trixie moreinfo Hi Anton On 2023-01-11 21:42:26 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: boost1...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:boost1.81 > > > Dear release team, > > this is the placeholder for the possible upcoming boost1.81 transition. > We are working hard to prepare the transition as smooth as possible. > > Large test rebuild of all dependent packages is planned. Thanks for working on boost 1.81. Unfortunately, this transition is too big and too late for bookworm. Let's do this one early in the trixie release cycle. Cheers > > Thanks > > Ben file: > > title = "boost1.81"; > is_affected = .depends ~ /libboost[a-z-.]*1\.[74]/ > is_good = .depends ~ /libboost[a-z-.]*1\.81/ > is_bad = .depends ~ /libboost[a-z-.]*1\.74/ > -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1028489: transition: boost1.81
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: boost1...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:boost1.81 Dear release team, this is the placeholder for the possible upcoming boost1.81 transition. We are working hard to prepare the transition as smooth as possible. Large test rebuild of all dependent packages is planned. Thanks Ben file: title = "boost1.81"; is_affected = .depends ~ /libboost[a-z-.]*1\.[74]/ is_good = .depends ~ /libboost[a-z-.]*1\.81/ is_bad = .depends ~ /libboost[a-z-.]*1\.74/
