Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

2023-06-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Can I suggest that if you file a few bugs and add some information in it so that maybe someone can look at it? If it only affects one architecture, send a mail to that list asking for help. Kurt

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

2023-06-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 05:52:44AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Am 19.06.23 um 23:29 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > > > The pragmatic option would be to run only a smoketest for build success > > > on architectures not tested by upstream. > > > > And have Format->Character in Impress crash

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

2023-06-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On June 18, 2023 11:37:55 PM GMT+02:00, Rob Landley wrote: >On 6/18/23 14:58, Rene Engelhard wrote: >>> Three years ago Samba maintainer Jeremy Allison lamented that "Both GPLv3 >>> and >>> the AGPL have been rejected soundly by most developers" and talked about >>> how he >>> regretted the

Re: Differences between the zani and zandonai build hosts?

2022-12-30 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 09:42:43AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Hi, > > First of all, thanks a lot for all your work on porting Debian to > the IBM z* systems! > > Are there any differences in the hardware or software configuration of > the zandonai and zani Debian buildd hosts? There is a

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

2016-08-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:05:06PM +0200, ni...@thykier.net wrote: > * If we were to enable -fPIE/-pie by default in GCC-6, should that change >also apply to this port? [0] If -fPIE is the default will -fPIC override it? It will also default to tell the linker to use -pie, but then don't do

Re: Upgrading the minimum required s390x CPU to z10?

2016-05-31 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 05:51:56AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:23:00PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 18:25, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > > > That's indeed the right way to do it (and to fix the issue), but the >

Re: Upgrading the minimum required s390x CPU to z10?

2016-05-31 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:23:00PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 18:25, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > That's indeed the right way to do it (and to fix the issue), but the > > point is that developers using GCC defaulting to z10 or higher don't > > realize they can't use

Re: vtk6_6.1.0+dfsg-4 on s390x

2014-06-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 01:01:28PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: Hi Kurt, thanks for information. Should I then put in BD something like: libhdf5-openmpi-dev [!s390x], libhdf5-mpich-dev [s390x]? Or you could do something like: libhdf5-openmpi-dev [!s390x] | libhdf5-mpich-dev, libhdf5-mpich-dev

Re: DSA concerns for jessie architectures

2013-08-08 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 09:06:31PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: On 06/22/2013 07:26 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: * sparc: no working nflog (mild concern); no stable kernels in stable (compiling clisp for instance crashes the kernel reliably on smetana). We need to run sparc with oldstable

Re: DSO linking changes for wheezy

2010-11-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The rationale is summarized in