Hi Dirk,
sorry for quoting all your mail, I do it for Josselin convenience. If
you check the slurm-llnl ITP Bug report logs (351688) [Bug] you
will see that Joss has offered himself for sponsorship.
Anyway I'm still waiting for some feedback and help about my last
package version (especially
Hi Gennaro,
On 7 March 2007 at 11:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi Dirk,
| sorry for quoting all your mail, I do it for Josselin convenience. If
| you check the slurm-llnl ITP Bug report logs (351688) [Bug] you
| will see that Joss has offered himself for sponsorship.
Ahh, I missed that. I saw
We have been happy using openmosix around here for years. However,
because it is tied to kernel 2.4 and not yet ported in a stable
version to amd64, I am in search of alternatives of load balancing.
Most of the i386 machines are also used as desktops, that is way I am
so interested on 2.6.
Hello
Kerrighed might be an answer :
http://www.kerrighed.org/
Sylvestre
Le mercredi 07 mars 2007 à 12:26 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
We have been happy using openmosix around here for years. However,
because it is tied to kernel 2.4 and not yet ported in a stable
version to
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 19:12:09 Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Kerrighed might be an answer :
http://www.kerrighed.org/
Very interesting... are the debs for testing, and a RFP/ITP filed?
Egon
--
CUBIC
blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Citando Brett Viren [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Egon Willighagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 19:12:09 Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Kerrighed might be an answer :
http://www.kerrighed.org/
Very interesting...
Indeed, however:
Current Status
The actual implementation of
6 matches
Mail list logo
