Re: libgsl stuck, can anybody help?

Hi Rudi, This is probably a question for debian-release or debian-devel and not debian-science ... I'll try to answer this from my vantage point, and I think that vorlon may correct any crass inaccurracies I state here. On 5 September 2007 at 06:07, Rudi Cilibrasi wrote: | Hi everybody, | | I

Re: debian-science and science-* packages

Hi, Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2007-08-24 08:30:24) : 1) Should these metapackages Recommend instead of Depending on the real ones? I see that is what the education-* metapackages do and presumably they have some reason for it. Already addressed by Andreas. 2) Maybe these

Re: debian-science and science-* packages

Hi, Christian Holm Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2007-08-26 10:46:38) : On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 08:30 -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: On 8/24/07, Frederic Lehobey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am unsure if it is ready to be uploaded to unstable. But I would be happy to hear your feedback and

Re: debian-science and science-* packages

Hi, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2007-08-28 23:29:44) : On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Christian Holm Christensen wrote: The problem could be, that `-physics' is just a tad too broad - maybe (and only maybe) it needs to be split up into parts (-nanoscience, -hep, -theory, -bio, -solid, ...) with

Re: libgsl stuck, can anybody help?

Hi Dirk, Hi Rudi, This is probably a question for debian-release or debian-devel and not debian-science ... I'll try to answer this from my vantage point, and I think that vorlon may correct any crass inaccurracies I state here. On 5 September 2007 at 06:07, Rudi Cilibrasi wrote: | Hi