On 9 September 2016 at 15:14, Gordon Ball wrote:
| On 09/09/16 14:17, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | The plan was to avoid seeing eg, lintian hardening-no-bindnow warnings
| > | on packages with compiled extensions. I tried injecting dpkg-buildflags
| > | LDFLAGS output into the MAKEFLAGS
On 09/09/16 14:17, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | The plan was to avoid seeing eg, lintian hardening-no-bindnow warnings
> | on packages with compiled extensions. I tried injecting dpkg-buildflags
> | LDFLAGS output into the MAKEFLAGS environment for R CMD INSTALL but it
> | doesn't appear to work.
(chopping down a little to shorten)
On 9 September 2016 at 10:50, Gordon Ball wrote:
| On 08/09/16 23:25, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Our Depends also need to cover R's "Imports:" which we will not see via
ldd. I
| > presume you have that covered, I just thought I'd mention it.
|
| Yes,
On 09/09/16 08:28, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> |
>> | Yeah, I'd love to see this happen too; I actually started looking at
>> | supporting it, so you could just do:
>> |
>> | %:
>> | dh --with r $@
>> |
>> | and get on with
On 08/09/16 23:25, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > * automatic substvars for known dependencies
> |
> | That's very appreciated and helps definitely to prevent errors since
> | sponsees as well as I myself forgot to sync Build-Depends with Depends
> | (versioned and unversioned). I verified
El Divendres, 9 de setembre de 2016, a les 03:38:36, Jose Luis Rivero va
escriure:
> Hi all:
>
> I've received the bug below that attaches a debdiff that includes a
> modification in the changelog with the header:
>
> +gazebo (7.3.0+dfsg-3+rpi1) stretch-staging; urgency=medium
>
> Two quick
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 03:38:36AM +0200, Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> +gazebo (7.3.0+dfsg-3+rpi1) stretch-staging; urgency=medium
>
> Two quick questions:
> * what does the rpi suffix mean? (raspberry pi?)
I'm positive that's something meaningful only for Peter Green, I've
never seen it in
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> |
> | Yeah, I'd love to see this happen too; I actually started looking at
> | supporting it, so you could just do:
> |
> | %:
> | dh --with r $@
> |
> | and get on with writing the rest of the bits.
>
> Exactly!
Yes,
8 matches
Mail list logo