Re: Debhelper for R packages

2016-10-07 16:25 GMT+02:00 Gordon Ball : > On 07/10/16 15:33, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >> >> On 7 October 2016 at 15:09, Andreas Tille wrote: >> | I'm fine with these changes. If you want to let this propagate to all >> | R+BioConductor packages probably a lintian warning

Re: Fwd: Re: HDF5 1.10 transition, netcdf 4.4.1 co-installable

Alastair McKinstry a écrit le 07/10/2016 à 18:46 : > For the benefit of those on debian-gis and not debian-science ... > > > Hi Alastair, > > Shouldn't you also include the GIS Team? hdf5 & netcdf are both > maintained there. Of course there are several reverse dependencies in > the science

HDF5 1.10 transition, netcdf 4.4.1 co-installable

On 07/10/16 16:30, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Are we going to try and do the HDF5 transition before the freeze, which > is the end of the month for transitions? I'll leave that to Gilles who has done a marvellous job on hdf5, although I'm not happy with the Debian specific changes to HDF5 we

Fwd: Re: HDF5 1.10 transition, netcdf 4.4.1 co-installable

For the benefit of those on debian-gis and not debian-science ... Hi Alastair, Shouldn't you also include the GIS Team? hdf5 & netcdf are both maintained there. Of course there are several reverse dependencies in the science team, so it would need to be a joint effort. Cheers, Ross On

Re: HDF5 1.10 transition, netcdf 4.4.1 co-installable

Hi Alastair, Shouldn't you also include the GIS Team? hdf5 & netcdf are both maintained there. Of course there are several reverse dependencies in the science team, so it would need to be a joint effort. Cheers, Ross On 07/10/16 16:30, Alastair McKinstry wrote: Hi, Are we going to try

HDF5 1.10 transition, netcdf 4.4.1 co-installable

Hi, Are we going to try and do the HDF5 transition before the freeze, which is the end of the month for transitions? I'm testing out the last of my changes for co-installable netcdf which I hope to have ready by the beginning of next week. It would be worth thinking about doing both. Best

Re: Debhelper for R packages

On 07/10/16 15:33, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 7 October 2016 at 15:09, Andreas Tille wrote: > | I'm fine with these changes. If you want to let this propagate to all > | R+BioConductor packages probably a lintian warning makes sense. May be > > Really? We don't have an officially

Re: Debhelper for R packages

On 7 October 2016 at 15:09, Andreas Tille wrote: | I'm fine with these changes. If you want to let this propagate to all | R+BioConductor packages probably a lintian warning makes sense. May be Really? We don't have an officially sanctioned policy that _mandates_ this. We are about giving

Re: Packaging librsb

Hi Raphael, On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 02:24:13AM +0200, Rafael Laboissière wrote: > I created a Git repository [1] for packaging librsb [2]. I intend to file > an ITP soon and any comments/suggestions/fixes will be welcome. Thanks for working on this. Could you suggest a set of tasks in Debian

Re: Debhelper for R packages

Hi, On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:39:05PM +0200, Gordon Ball wrote: > it's been in NEW for the last two weeks so hopefully the FTP masters > will have a chance to review it soon. I've sent an e-mail yesterday to ftpmaster giving reasons to handle dh-r with higher priority. > > Just a very small