Re: Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

2017-10-12 Thread Johannes Ranke
Am Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017, 12:01:14 CEST schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: > So we did this 71 times, but stopped 4+ years ago. Not sure what got the > toolchain coughing, but I guess we could try again. texi2dvi used to trip over ~ in path names, so for locally building backports we used to

Re: Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

2017-10-12 Thread Graham Inggs
On 12 October 2017 at 19:01, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > So we did this 71 times, but stopped 4+ years ago. Not sure what got the > toolchain coughing, but I guess we could try again. That would be great, thanks!

Re: Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

2017-10-12 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 12 October 2017 at 17:45, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi Dirk | | On 12/10/2017 16:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > And yes, the hint re 3.5 being shaky leads itself to uploading to experimental. | | Would you please consider versioning such uploads as 3.5~something | instead of 3.4.something? |

Re: Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

2017-10-12 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Dirk On 12/10/2017 16:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: And yes, the hint re 3.5 being shaky leads itself to uploading to experimental. Would you please consider versioning such uploads as 3.5~something instead of 3.4.something? e.g. your second-to-last upload of r-base was 3.4.1.20170921-1

Re: Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

2017-10-12 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 12 October 2017 at 16:18, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 09:13:54AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 12 October 2017 at 15:58, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | > | Thanks Charles for explaining this. | > | | > | Actually the migration has already happened, thanks to

Re: Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

2017-10-12 Thread Sébastien Villemot
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 09:13:54AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 12 October 2017 at 15:58, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > | Thanks Charles for explaining this. > | > | Actually the migration has already happened, thanks to the Release Team that > | took appropriate action to mitigate the

Re: Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

2017-10-12 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 12 October 2017 at 15:58, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | Thanks Charles for explaining this. | | Actually the migration has already happened, thanks to the Release Team that | took appropriate action to mitigate the impact of the most recent uploads. | | This will soon be reflected in the

Re: Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

2017-10-12 Thread Sébastien Villemot
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:40:00PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > the point is that r-base and all the other packages will only migrate to > testing when all of them will be ready at the same time. Packages need > 5 days to migrate to Testing and each upload resets the counter, thus > blocking

Transition finalised (Was: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised)

2017-10-12 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 07:41:35AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > | > | In the interest to close the transition bug opened you opened yourself > | > > | > s/opened// to make it a sentence > | > > | > s/you/Seb/ to make it correct. Not my transition at all. > ... > > You. Still, Don't.

Re: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

2017-10-12 Thread Charles Plessy
Hi Dirk and everybody the point is that r-base and all the other packages will only migrate to testing when all of them will be ready at the same time. Packages need 5 days to migrate to Testing and each upload resets the counter, thus blocking the migration of all. Therefore, a break of 5 days

Re: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

2017-10-12 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 12 October 2017 at 14:26, Andreas Tille wrote: | On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 07:06:33AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 12 October 2017 at 11:36, Andreas Tille wrote: | > | yesterday you uploaded | > | | > | r-cran-rcpparmadillo 0.8.100.1.0-1 | > | | > | In the interest to

Re: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

2017-10-12 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 07:06:33AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 12 October 2017 at 11:36, Andreas Tille wrote: > | yesterday you uploaded > | > | r-cran-rcpparmadillo 0.8.100.1.0-1 > | > | In the interest to close the transition bug opened you opened yourself > >

Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

2017-10-12 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 12 October 2017 at 11:36, Andreas Tille wrote: | Hi Dirk, | | yesterday you uploaded | | r-cran-rcpparmadillo 0.8.100.1.0-1 | | In the interest to close the transition bug opened you opened yourself s/opened// to make it a sentence s/you/Seb/ to make it correct. Not my

Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

2017-10-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Dirk, yesterday you uploaded r-cran-rcpparmadillo 0.8.100.1.0-1 In the interest to close the transition bug opened you opened yourself it would be helpful if you would not upload r-* packages as long as the testing migration has not happened. Thank you Andreas. On Sat, Sep