Thanks, I could make some transfers.
Cheers,
Jerome
On 05/02/2022 13:35, Tobias Hansen wrote:
On 2/5/22 12:12, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I plan to transfer sooner or later the following packages from science-team to
math-team:
4ti2
primesieve
bliss
blitz++
e-antic
nauty
mpfrc++
normaliz
Am Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 01:12:34PM +0100 schrieb Jerome BENOIT:
> I plan to transfer sooner or later the following packages from science-team
> to math-team:
>
> 4ti2
> primesieve
> bliss
> blitz++
> e-antic
> nauty
> mpfrc++
> normaliz
> primesieve
> singular
> sympow
> mpfi
>
> can anyone
On 2/5/22 12:12, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>
> I plan to transfer sooner or later the following packages from science-team
> to math-team:
>
> 4ti2
> primesieve
> bliss
> blitz++
> e-antic
> nauty
> mpfrc++
> normaliz
> primesieve
> singular
> sympow
> mpfi
>
> can anyone grant me the necessary
Hello,
On 07/11/2021 12:56, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
On Mon 01 Nov 2021 10:28:55 AM EDT, Andreas Tille wrote:
How to move a package:
In Salsa:
Settings
-> General
-> Advanced [Expand]
-> Transfer project
This redirects users who are using the old URL.
On 2021-12-06 16:04, Drew Parsons wrote:
On 2021-10-29 19:31, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
During the Debian Science BoF at this year's DebConf, there was some
discussion of creating a team devoted to packaging mathematical
software.
This seemed like a pretty good idea, so I figured that I'd go
On 2021-10-29 19:31, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
During the Debian Science BoF at this year's DebConf, there was some
discussion of creating a team devoted to packaging mathematical
software.
This seemed like a pretty good idea, so I figured that I'd go ahead and
start working on getting it set
On 4 December 2021 5:43:35 pm IST, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>On 11/3/21 4:08 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 04:55:54PM +0100 schrieb Julien Puydt:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Le lundi 01 novembre 2021 à 15:28 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
How to move a package:
In Salsa:
On 11/3/21 4:08 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 04:55:54PM +0100 schrieb Julien Puydt:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Le lundi 01 novembre 2021 à 15:28 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>>> How to move a package:
>>>
>>> In Salsa:
>>>
>>> Settings
>>> -> General
>>> -> Advanced
Hi Nilesh,
On 2021-11-04 13:13, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 11:48:45AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> Maybe separate mailing lists could be enough? In the end
>> upstreams mostly work on one-two source packages, and even if they
>> become DMs they do not get push/upload
On 2021-11-09 16:20, Nilesh Patra wrote:
Makes sense to me.
Maybe, it is also a fine idea to move packages which are important in
the science team,
but are unmaintained.
Ofcourse, only if some volunteer is willing to take care of it.
Makes sense to move meschach to the Maths team.
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 10:54:35AM -0500, M. Zhou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At this point I have some doubt on "what should be moved to
> math team." The borderline and the expected outcome are
> not discussed in some specific cases.
>
> In my understanding, domain-specific mathematical applications,
>
Hi,
At this point I have some doubt on "what should be moved to
math team." The borderline and the expected outcome are
not discussed in some specific cases.
In my understanding, domain-specific mathematical applications,
such as theorem prover, would be a good fit for the new team.
And this is
Hi Ole,
On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 08:04 +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Instead, I would suggest to keep (and improve) the Science Team
> policy,
> and then to have a *tiny* Math team policy, which could just be a
> 5..10-liner, like
>
> > We inherit the Science Team policy, except:
> > * The
Hi Anton,
My first impression is the same -- that may increase fragmentation.
But in fact, as long as the main contributors on these packages are
happy, why should we stop them :-)
Debian contributors are already scarce. If a new team help a group
of maintainers retain their enthusiasm, it will
Le jeudi 04 novembre 2021 à 10:31 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 03:41:43PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> >
> > > We should remember that having blends packages, blends web pages
> > > and
> > > informative wiki pages are completely independent of having a
> > > defined
On Sun 07 Nov 2021 08:39:22 AM EST, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 11:56:11AM + schrieb Torrance, Douglas:
On Mon 01 Nov 2021 10:28:55 AM EDT, Andreas Tille wrote:
Would anyone be able to either grant me owner
permissions, or alternatively transfer the following from
Hi Gard,
Am Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 04:38:09PM +0100 schrieb Gard Spreemann:
>
> >> Aha! Thanks for teaching me. I'll fix these things.
> >>
> >> Where are these task files documented, by the way?
> >
> >https://blends.debian.org/blends/ch06.html
> >
> > You could hopefully find the Blends doc
Andreas Tille writes:
> Hi Gard,
>
> Am Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 01:51:14PM +0100 schrieb Gard Spreemann:
>>
>> > All 'X-*' fields in tasks files are pure comments for editors of the
>> > tasks files and are technically ignored (as well as in d/control files).
>>
>> Aha! Thanks for teaching me.
Hi Doug,
Am Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 11:56:11AM + schrieb Torrance, Douglas:
> On Mon 01 Nov 2021 10:28:55 AM EDT, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Maintainer must not be sufficient, as this option doesn't appear to me
> for debian-science packages.
Yes, I think you need to be owner to delete a
On Mon 01 Nov 2021 10:28:55 AM EDT, Andreas Tille wrote:
How to move a package:
In Salsa:
Settings
-> General
-> Advanced [Expand]
-> Transfer project
This redirects users who are using the old URL. For sure you need the
according permissions in both
Hi Gard,
Am Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 01:51:14PM +0100 schrieb Gard Spreemann:
>
> > All 'X-*' fields in tasks files are pure comments for editors of the
> > tasks files and are technically ignored (as well as in d/control files).
>
> Aha! Thanks for teaching me. I'll fix these things.
>
> Where
On 2021-11-05 14:44, Andrius Merkys wrote:
Hi Ole,
On 2021-11-03 13:52, Ole Streicher wrote:
...
Why can't a Python math package be maintained by both the Python and
the
math team?
Maintainer: Debian Math Team <...>
Uploaders: Debian Python Team <...>, me
This would set a primary team
Hi Ole,
On 2021-11-03 13:52, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Andrius Merkys writes:
>> problem: How would we define what is math software? What would be done
>> with interdisciplinary software? For example, I maintain two packages,
>> spglib and voronota, which deal with crystallography (chemistry?),
Andrius Merkys writes:
> On 2021-11-03 17:55, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Blends categorisation is *not* exclusive. One package can be in two or
>> more Blends (and we have lots of examples for this).
>
> ACK. However, team categorization is exclusive.
In principle, we could put "secondary" teams
Andreas Tille writes:
> Am Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 10:22:32AM +0100 schrieb Gard Spreemann:
>>
>> I will try to categorize the few packages I maintain myself, and issue a
>> merge request so that there are examples for people to go by.
>
> I merged your commits but the proper way to go would to
Hi Andrius,
Am Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 01:56:56PM +0200 schrieb Andrius Merkys:
> > Blends categorisation is *not* exclusive. One package can be in two or
> > more Blends (and we have lots of examples for this).
>
> ACK. However, team categorization is exclusive.
If you call organisation of team
Hi Andreas,
On 2021-11-03 17:55, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 01:26:34PM +0200 schrieb Andrius Merkys:
>>> No notes, Andreas came up with this idea in debconf, you could find it on
>>> videos.debian.net.
>>> But anyways, I have the following point to make:
>>>
>>> 1. Separate
Am Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 10:22:32AM +0100 schrieb Gard Spreemann:
>
> I will try to categorize the few packages I maintain myself, and issue a
> merge request so that there are examples for people to go by.
I merged your commits but the proper way to go would to create say two
new tasks files
Torrance, Douglas writes:
> On Thu 04 Nov 2021 12:06:47 PM EDT, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> All mathematics
>>> packages? How do the categories work, and what conditions warrant a new
>>> category?
>>
>> You need to ask the mathematicians what might be sensible tasks.
>> The tasks mathematics and
Andreas Tille writes:
> Hi Gard,
>
> Am Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 11:02:49AM +0100 schrieb Gard Spreemann:
>> > I've pushed the code for the metapackages to
>> >
>> > https://salsa.debian.org/blends-team/math/
>> >
>> > and made
>> >
>> > Doug Torrance
>> > Julien Puydt
>> > Timo
On 4 November 2021 9:32:08 pm IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Am Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 04:43:12PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>> > I disagree. I find at least JavaScript and Perl packages quite uniform,
>> > and I have an impression that at least
>>
>> I cannot say about perl,
>
>I
On Thu 04 Nov 2021 12:06:47 PM EDT, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> All mathematics
>> packages? How do the categories work, and what conditions warrant a new
>> category?
>
> You need to ask the mathematicians what might be sensible tasks.
> The tasks mathematics and mathematics-dev are definitely
Hi Gard,
Am Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 11:02:49AM +0100 schrieb Gard Spreemann:
> > I've pushed the code for the metapackages to
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/blends-team/math/
> >
> > and made
> >
> > Doug Torrance
> > Julien Puydt
> > Timo Röhling
> >
> > members of the Blends team
Hi,
Am Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 04:43:12PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> > I disagree. I find at least JavaScript and Perl packages quite uniform,
> > and I have an impression that at least
>
> I cannot say about perl,
I absolutely agree about Perl team and as I said we left some Perl
libraries to
Am Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 04:48:25PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> > I've pushed the code for the metapackages to
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/blends-team/math/
>
> Many thanks!
You are welcome.
> > [...]
> > members of the Blends team to enable currating these files (which should
> >
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 03:41:43PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> >
> > > We should remember that having blends packages, blends web pages and
> > > informative wiki pages are completely independent of having a defined
> > > team
Hi Andrius,
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 11:48:45AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Maybe separate mailing lists could be enough? In the end
> upstreams mostly work on one-two source packages, and even if they
> become DMs they do not get push/upload permissions for all source
> packages of a team, do
Andreas Tille writes:
> Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 03:41:43PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>>
>> > We should remember that having blends packages, blends web pages and
>> > informative wiki pages are completely independent of having a defined team
>> > with
>> > separate VCS and mailing list.
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for finding time to reply to my worries.
On 2021-11-01 16:19, Andreas Tille wrote:
> 1. Another "one-man" team
> I think Ole gave a good answer here: Its not about creating a
> one-man team but rather attract more people to the team - from
> inside and
Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 03:41:43PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>
> > We should remember that having blends packages, blends web pages and
> > informative wiki pages are completely independent of having a defined team
> > with
> > separate VCS and mailing list. All that needs is one or more
Dear Anton,
Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 09:09:15PM +0100 schrieb Anton Gladky:
> I think we all have a very limited free time to work on Debian.
> At least it is my situation.
>
> ...
>
> I will probably need to request membership in other teams due to
> some QA or release-transition work, but
I think we all have a very limited free time to work on Debian.
At least it is my situation.
Newcomers are looking for reviewers/uploaders, trying to reach
a relatively large audience in d/science, sometimes for a very long
time without success. How will it work in a smaller team?
Doing some
Hi,
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2021 à 17:08 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 04:55:54PM +0100 schrieb Julien Puydt:
> > Perhaps I lack some credentials?
>
> Seems you need to be "Owner" to remove a repository somewhere ... and
> now you are.
> Please try again.
Perfect!
Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 04:55:54PM +0100 schrieb Julien Puydt:
> Hi,
>
> Le lundi 01 novembre 2021 à 15:28 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> >
> > How to move a package:
> >
> > In Salsa:
> >
> > Settings
> > -> General
> > -> Advanced [Expand]
> > ->
Hi,
Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 03:41:43PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> I could agree that there will initially be a few people looking after, but I
> do expect
> this team to grow, like several other teams in Debian have too. Maybe Andreas
> could give
> better pointers here.
Since my name was
Hi,
Le lundi 01 novembre 2021 à 15:28 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> How to move a package:
>
> In Salsa:
>
> Settings
> -> General
> -> Advanced [Expand]
> -> Transfer project
>
> This redirects users who are using the old URL. For sure you need
>
Hi Andrius,
Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 01:26:34PM +0200 schrieb Andrius Merkys:
> > No notes, Andreas came up with this idea in debconf, you could find it on
> > videos.debian.net.
> > But anyways, I have the following point to make:
> >
> > 1. Separate team will help keep track of math-specific
Andrius Merkys writes:
> problem: How would we define what is math software? What would be done
> with interdisciplinary software? For example, I maintain two packages,
> spglib and voronota, which deal with crystallography (chemistry?), but
> employ heavy math. Should I put them in debichem or
Hi Nilesh,
On 2021-10-30 15:48, Nilesh Patra wrote:
Thanks for replying. See below :-
Thanks for answering my concerns, and sorry for the long silence.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 10:33:02AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote:
I agree with Anton here. I do not see how further fragmentation of
Hi,
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2021 à 15:41 +0530, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
>
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 08:38:10PM +1100, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> > Separate teams are optimised for the "main" maintainer of a handful
> > of
> > packages who doesn't routinely work on any other packages; they are
> >
Nilesh Patra writes:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 08:38:10PM +1100, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>
>> However, the disadvantages of separate teams are
>>
>> - differing conventions in each team around VCS layout, interactions etc
>
> We adopt the policy of the science team, so the VCS layout will
Hi Stuart,
Thanks for replying, see below:-
On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 08:38:10PM +1100, Stuart Prescott wrote:
I'll start from here,
> However, the disadvantages of separate teams are
>
> - differing conventions in each team around VCS layout, interactions etc
We adopt the policy of the
Hi folks
From this discussion it seems that the main advantages of separate teams are
- bespoke views of packages via tracker/dppo/udd
- mailing lists where the signal:noise is higher (if you're lucky)
However, the disadvantages of separate teams are
- differing conventions in each team
On Tue 02 Nov 2021 04:08:32 AM EDT, Nilesh Patra wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 08:57:21PM +, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
On Mon 01 Nov 2021 04:35:36 PM EDT, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:20:18PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote:
> > H... for each package, the Maintainer
Am Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 08:04:40AM +0100 schrieb Ole Streicher:
> I'd really disagree here. We should avoid a fragmentation of the policy
> without a really good reason. This makes it difficult for people to step
> in, as they have to learn all the small differences in the team
> policy. And it is
* Ole Streicher [2021-11-02 08:04]:
Instead, I would suggest to keep (and improve) the Science Team policy,
and then to have a *tiny* Math team policy, which could just be a
5..10-liner, like
| We inherit the Science Team policy, except:
| * The maintainer field should be set to
| "Debian
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 08:57:21PM +, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
> On Mon 01 Nov 2021 04:35:36 PM EDT, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:20:18PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote:
> > > H... for each package, the Maintainer field in d/control should
> > > probably be changed to --
"Torrance, Douglas" writes:
> I went ahead and started a draft of a team policy including this as
> the Maintainer address [1]. It's just a fork of the Debian Science
> policy and still needs a lot of work. The source is at [2]. Please
> feel free to suggest/make changes!
I'd really disagree
On Mon 01 Nov 2021 04:35:36 PM EDT, Nilesh Patra wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:20:18PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote:
H... for each package, the Maintainer field in d/control should
probably be changed to -- "Debian Math Team
The much better option would be to use instead.
So as to
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:20:18PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Le lundi 01 novembre 2021 à 15:28 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> > Hi Julien,
> >
> > Am Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 04:15:28PM +0100 schrieb Julien Puydt:
> > > For all packages in the debian science team, I'm ok with them
> > > moving
Le lundi 01 novembre 2021 à 15:28 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Julien,
>
> Am Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 04:15:28PM +0100 schrieb Julien Puydt:
> > For all packages in the debian science team, I'm ok with them
> > moving to
> > the new team. [I have no clue how to move them]
>
> How to move a
Hi,
I am interested in the creation of this list. The Debian Math Team is being
created now; https://salsa.debian.org/math-team was created last week, it
currently has 11 members. The need for this group (and list) has been
discussed in the thread starting at
On Sun 31 Oct 2021 03:49:56 PM EDT, Nilesh Patra wrote:
@Doug, do you intend asking out for a mailing list?
Done! See https://bugs.debian.org/998244
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Tobias,
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:52:19AM +, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> On 10/31/21 7:49 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 04:15:28PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote:
> >> Perhaps the debian sagemath team should be merged in the math team?
> > Yep, that was the plan. Hope sagemath
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 03:44:32PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> I've just clicked
> https://salsa.debian.org/groups/math-team/-/group_members/request_access and
> got "Your request for access has been queued for review." Could you grant me
> (user joostvb) access?
Added you, Andreas
Hi Doug,
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 05:31:20PM +, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
> During the Debian Science BoF at this year's DebConf, there was some
> discussion of creating a team devoted to packaging mathematical software.
>
> This seemed like a pretty good idea, so I figured that I'd go ahead
Hi Julien,
Am Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 04:15:28PM +0100 schrieb Julien Puydt:
> But about moving things, my feelings are mixed. Indeed, this very week,
> I joined the OCaml Team and packaged src:elpi there -- which is
> mathematics software. But since it's written in OCaml, I feel it's
> better to
Hi Doug and other Debian Science team members,
at first thanks a lot for the step you did. I think it is a move into
the right direction. As far as I've read the worries about this step
here in the thread these seem to be:
1. Another "one-man" team
I think Ole gave a good answer here:
On 10/31/21 7:49 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 04:15:28PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote:
>> Perhaps the debian sagemath team should be merged in the math team?
> Yep, that was the plan. Hope sagemath folks agree there.
>
> Nilesh
Hi,
yeah, why not. In the best case it leads to
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 04:15:28PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Hi,
> Count me in on this team (on salsa & mailing-list).
Added to salsa.
@Doug, do you intend asking out for a mailing list?
> But about moving things, my feelings are mixed. Indeed, this very week,
> I joined the OCaml Team and
Hi,
Le vendredi 29 octobre 2021 à 17:31 +, Torrance, Douglas a écrit :
> During the Debian Science BoF at this year's DebConf, there was some
> discussion of creating a team devoted to packaging mathematical
> software.
>
> This seemed like a pretty good idea, so I figured that I'd go ahead
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 at 16:18, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please add me to the math team as well:
>
> calculus
>
Done.
> I will migrate my math packages on the the go.
>
Sure!
Nilesh
Hello,
please add me to the math team as well:
calculus
I will migrate my math packages on the the go.
On 30/10/2021 22:28, Nilesh Patra wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 05:05:32PM +0200, Gard Spreemann wrote:
Hi,
That being said, my opinion on the matter is not a strong
one, and if a math
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 05:05:32PM +0200, Gard Spreemann wrote:
Hi,
> That being said, my opinion on the matter is not a strong
> one, and if a math team is indeed formed, please do add me to it (Salsa
> user "gspr").
Done, thanks!
> I currently maintain the following math packages: gudhi,
Torrance, Douglas writes:
> During the Debian Science BoF at this year's DebConf, there was some
> discussion of creating a team devoted to packaging mathematical software.
>
> This seemed like a pretty good idea, so I figured that I'd go ahead and
> start working on getting it set up. I've
Hi
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:26:32AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Anton Gladky writes:
> > well, I think that it just increases a fragmentation.
>
> Based on my own experience with debian-astro, I don't see this as a
> problem: If there is enough enhusiasm, an own blend gives much more
>
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 02:52:25PM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> On 2021-10-30 14:45, Anton Gladky wrote:
>>From my point of view, we have enough really useful work in Debian which
>> needs to be done (fixing bugs, adding autopkgtests, setting-up
>> CI-pipelines etc.)
>> instead of moving
Hi Andrius,
Thanks for replying. See below :-
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 10:33:02AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-10-29 20:31, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
> > During the Debian Science BoF at this year's DebConf, there was some
> > discussion of creating a team devoted to packaging
Hi all,
I found this quote of myself from 2007:
> Last year, I was thinking about starting something like « Debian
> Biology », and Andreas Tille suggested me to join the Debian-Med project
> instead. I think that I would hardly have acheived anyhing if I had not
> listened to his advice.
While I agree, this may also be good thing. There will be more Sprints
(I hope) with then more people that are brought to our community at
large. And Debian so far does very well in keeping all those fragments
together.
Best,
Steffen
On 30.10.21 01:55, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi Doug,
well, I
On 2021-10-30 14:45, Anton Gladky wrote:
> I do not see any benefits from creating a one-more team. It decreases
> definitely bus-factor of the package, will unlikely increase their quality
> and for end-users it is mostly not visible, in what team it is maintained.
>
> Sure, feel free to create
I do not see any benefits from creating a one-more team. It decreases
definitely bus-factor of the package, will unlikely increase their quality
and for end-users it is mostly not visible, in what team it is maintained.
Sure, feel free to create it, if you want, but please do not move any
Anton Gladky writes:
> well, I think that it just increases a fragmentation.
Based on my own experience with debian-astro, I don't see this as a
problem: If there is enough enhusiasm, an own blend gives much more
possibilities and a more fine-grained structure for packaging, and a
higher
Hi,
On 2021-10-29 20:31, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
> During the Debian Science BoF at this year's DebConf, there was some
> discussion of creating a team devoted to packaging mathematical software.
I agree with Anton here. I do not see how further fragmentation of
debian-science could benefit it.
On Sat, 30 Oct, 2021, 12:27 pm Ben Tris, wrote:
> Just want to notice
>
> Debian Science
> https://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/mathematics
> https://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/mathematics-dev
> Debian edu
> https://blends.debian.org/edu/tasks/mathematics
>
> Debian packages has a
Just want to notice
Debian Science
https://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/mathematics
https://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/mathematics-dev
Debian edu
https://blends.debian.org/edu/tasks/mathematics
Debian packages has a mathematics category
Hi Doug,
well, I think that it just increases a fragmentation. But it is up to you.
Best regards
Anton
Am Fr., 29. Okt. 2021 um 22:04 Uhr schrieb Torrance, Douglas
:
>
> During the Debian Science BoF at this year's DebConf, there was some
> discussion of creating a team devoted to packaging
Hi Doug,
Thanks for doing this!
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 05:31:20PM +, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
> During the Debian Science BoF at this year's DebConf, there was some
> discussion of creating a team devoted to packaging mathematical software.
>
> This seemed like a pretty good idea, so I
88 matches
Mail list logo
