Hi Steffen,
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 07:58:29PM +0100, Steffen Moeller wrote:
Now 2.4 is out and there should only be a single 2.4 branch left.
I understand 2.4 is now stable and the packaging is what can be found
in trunk. However, I don't see any recent changes to trunk, and the
changelog is
this package to the
debian-science repo. I tend to agree with them, and it would be fairly
trivial to do.
given the silence that Morten and I produce, I can only follow you in
your suggestion. I cannot tell if I have commit rights for
debian-science. If you continue caring for torque on Debian, then I
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 07:58:29PM +0100, Steffen Moeller wrote:
I am somewhat lost myself. Yes, I wanted to upload the Ubuntu approach of 2.3
and then move towards the Debian approach for 2.4, but I have never uploaded
anything for 2.3 because of my uncertainty about it being in main or
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 19/12/09 at 16:30 +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
In any case, back when I started packaging torque and
then joined the common effort, I looked torque's licence and couldn't
find anything that could make it plain non-free. If my opinion counts,
we should make our initial
in trunk. Should I merge my work there?
In Ubuntu, the torque package resides in Multiverse which
corresponds to the non-free section of Debian. Torque has it's own
peculiar license which tends to make the archive-admins nervous. It
is my conviction however, that Torque in practice is FOSS perhaps
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 07:58:29PM +0100, Steffen Moeller wrote:
In my (updated) mind, what is not clearly free is non-free.
So please explain which parts of the license you consider non-free and
why.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le jeudi 10 décembre 2009 à 16:50 +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard a écrit :
Hi Dirk,
I seem to recall that someone once mentioned packaging of Morten's
Torque
packages from Ubuntu. I also seem to recall Steffen saying that he
was in
contact with Morten. Based on quick
already and accepted as Free, my interest in Torque has considerably been
reduced, though. We are just migrating to gridengine here.
[ Google sees traces of informal packaging of Torque on non-Debian
repos and
prior debian-legal discussion -- did that ever progress beyond the
earlier
Nope
On 11/12/2009 11:44, Steffen Moeller wrote:
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le jeudi 10 décembre 2009 à 16:50 +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard a écrit :
We are now co-maintaining the package in Debian's pkg-escience team
[0]. The version that is currently in Ubuntu is in one of the
branches.
version to Ubuntu in the
current development cycle (Lucid). There is a single bug in LP that
can hopefully be closed along with that.
[ Google sees traces of informal packaging of Torque on non-Debian
repos and
prior debian-legal discussion -- did that ever progress beyond the
earlier
Nope
Le jeudi 10 décembre 2009 à 16:50 +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard a écrit :
Hi Dirk,
I seem to recall that someone once mentioned packaging of Morten's
Torque
packages from Ubuntu. I also seem to recall Steffen saying that he
was in
contact with Morten. Based on quick search of my mail
traces of informal packaging of Torque on non-Debian repos and
prior debian-legal discussion -- did that ever progress beyond the earlier
Nope ? ]
Dirk
--
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
