I am thinking of packaging stan and rstan, and would appreciate some advice.
stan is a program for doing Bayesian analysis with a variant of
hybrid/Hamiltonian monte carlo. http://mc-stan.org/ homepage;
https://github.com/stan-dev/rstan.git
and https://github.com/stan-dev/stan.git for code
Hi Ross
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 08:06:16AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
I am thinking of packaging stan and rstan, and would appreciate some advice.
Nice.
stan is a program for doing Bayesian analysis with a variant of
hybrid/Hamiltonian monte carlo. http://mc-stan.org/ homepage;
https
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 12:50:53PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi Ross
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 08:06:16AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
I am thinking of packaging stan and rstan, and would appreciate some
advice
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
...
It sounds like rstan is an R wrapper around stan? Then I would assume
it should be possible to build/use rstan without the full stan source
being around.
I believe that's correct. At runtime I think rstan needs
On 3 August 2013 at 14:58, Ross Boylan wrote:
| Is stan building a shared or static library?
|
| Yes. Not sure which.
Almost surely shared because ...
| If not, that may be the
| missing link between the two. Requiring the stan source be present when
| building rstan (as a
5 matches
Mail list logo