On 2 September 2015 at 17:26, Andreas Tille wrote:
| Hi Jonathon,
|
| On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:09:59PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote:
| > >
| > > I would have loved if the patch would have been discussed - IMHO it is
| > > sensible.
| >
| > oh ok. still figuring out how much autonomy i'm
Hi Jonathon,
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:09:59PM +0200, Jonathon Love wrote:
> >
> > I would have loved if the patch would have been discussed - IMHO it is
> > sensible.
>
> oh ok. still figuring out how much autonomy i'm supposed to exhibit. i
> do like to lead with a concrete implementation -
On 2 September 2015 at 15:09, Jonathon Love wrote:
| fixed now. a lot of these R packages don't do you any favours coming up
| with a < 80 char description.
Simply a different (if related in spirit and scope) spec -- R itself has
rather stringent checks in 'R CMD check ...' which, not unlike
Hi Dirk,
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:07:04PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 31 August 2015 at 18:40, Jonathon Love wrote:
> | hi andreas.
> |
> | r-cran-rinside should be good to go.
>
> Is there a reason I shouldn't maintain, being upstream and all that?
At first sight I see two
4 matches
Mail list logo