Re: VTK and ParaView parallelization

Hi François, thanks for a suggestion! I have added you to Debian Science Team on salsa. Feel free to contribute! Best regards Anton Am Do., 22. Apr. 2021 um 21:46 Uhr schrieb François Mazen : > Hello, > > I'm wondering why VTK and ParaView are build with the "Sequential" > default backend

VTK and ParaView parallelization

Hello, I'm wondering why VTK and ParaView are build with the "Sequential" default backend for parallelization (vtkSMPTools backend)? This makes ParaView run slower compared to official binary releases from Kitware, which are built with Threaded Building Blocks (TBB). Hence, any serious user of

Re: Packaging xsimd

As far as --march=native goes, in my opinion it's ok since it's only used in tests, i.e. testing that the files build and run. This is because it's actually a header-only package, no binaries (executables or libraries) are provided. So the package that we ship hasn't been "built" with

Re: Packaging xsimd

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 22:06, Julien Lamy wrote: > Le 22/04/2021 à 18:29, Nilesh Patra a écrit : > > > > > > On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 21:38, Julien Lamy > > wrote: > > > > No, it can work with only SSE and only SSE2 enabled, which would > match > > the baseline

Re: Packaging xsimd

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 21:38, Julien Lamy wrote: > No, it can work with only SSE and only SSE2 enabled, which would match > the baseline (tested with a non-AVX machine, I could not get my hands on > a non-SSE2 box). > > > * Is this portable to arches other than x86 and arm? > > Theoretically

Re: Packaging xsimd

Le 22/04/2021 à 13:29, Nilesh Patra a écrit : On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 15:39, Julien Lamy > wrote: Good to know. I've run salsa-ci on Gitlab.com and everything comes out OK. If the package looks good to you, I'd welcome the sponsored upload; the package

Re: Packaging xsimd

Le 22/04/2021 à 12:45, Drew Parsons a écrit : On 2021-04-22 12:09, Julien Lamy wrote: >> Not really. Upload for packages which are not in testing can be done, and accpeted. New packages targeting unstable is absolutely OK. It's just that they won't migrate to testing until bullseye is out.

Re: Packaging xsimd

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 15:39, Julien Lamy wrote: > > Good to know. I've run salsa-ci on Gitlab.com and everything comes out > OK. If the package looks good to you, I'd welcome the sponsored upload; > the package being a header-only C++ library, the build should take less > than a minute. > I

Re: Packaging xsimd

On 2021-04-22 12:09, Julien Lamy wrote: >> Not really. Upload for packages which are not in testing can be done, and accpeted. New packages targeting unstable is absolutely OK. It's just that they won't migrate to testing until bullseye is out. That said, I'll happily sponsor you an upload

Re: Packaging xsimd

Hi Nilesh Le 22/04/2021 à 11:23, Nilesh Patra a écrit : Hi Julien, On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 11:51, Julien Lamy > wrote: Dear all, I'm working on a project which depends on xsimd, a C++ wrapper for SIMD instructions (https://github.com/xtensor-stack/xsimd/

Re: Packaging xsimd

On 2021-04-22 11:23, Nilesh Patra wrote: Hi Julien, On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 11:51, Julien Lamy wrote: Dear all, I'm working on a project which depends on xsimd, a C++ wrapper for SIMD ... I have added you to the science team, please push your changes to the science-team namespace. Welcome

Packaging xsimd

Dear all, I'm working on a project which depends on xsimd, a C++ wrapper for SIMD instructions (https://github.com/xtensor-stack/xsimd/) and noticed that there is an old RFP for it (#867915), mentioning a maintenance by debian-science. I've created a first draft for this package and pushed it