Re: suitesparse-graphblas_6.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes is NEW

Hi all, Sorry for the previous mail by FTP Masters. I used the wrong email address in the Maintainer field. @sebastien: As you can see, the SOVERSION of GraphBLAS changed so there is no more conflict with libgraphblas5 from the suitesparse source package. Best regards, Vincent Le 17/11/2021 à

suitesparse-graphblas_6.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:libgraphblas-dev is NEW. binary:libgraphblas-doc is NEW. binary:libgraphblas6 is NEW. binary:libgraphblas-dev is NEW. binary:libgraphblas-doc is NEW. binary:libgraphblas6 is NEW. source:suitesparse-graphblas is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action

Processing of suitesparse-graphblas_6.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

suitesparse-graphblas_6.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: suitesparse-graphblas_6.0.0+dfsg-1.dsc suitesparse-graphblas_6.0.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz suitesparse-graphblas_6.0.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz libgraphblas-dev_6.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb

Re: Continuing packaging effort (was: Bug#994272: RFS: opm-{common|material|grid|models|simulators|upscaling}/2021.04-1 [ITP] -- opm -- Open Porous Media Software Suite)

Hi Markus, thanks for contribution! I briefly reviewed your packages and did not find any serious issues there! Also employing Salsa-CI is really cool stuff, which is helping to be sure that the package is OK. Please consider to become DM/DD. Best regards Anton Am Mi., 17. Nov. 2021 um 09:50

Re: Continuing packaging effort (was: Bug#994272: RFS: opm-{common|material|grid|models|simulators|upscaling}/2021.04-1 [ITP] -- opm -- Open Porous Media Software Suite)

Hi Anton, On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:53:21PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: I have not uploaded simulators yet. So I reverted to the -1 version. Cool, I will adjust the tags accordingly if you don't mind. All package are now in NEW of ftpmaster. Thanks Anton and Debian Science. That was a