On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 01:19 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
Hi,
The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did
not result any comments. Which rises the suspicion that the maintainers
of affected packages are not reading debian-release or debian-toolchain.
Indeed, I don't read
Greetings,
I am trying to package OpenCASCADE, Salomé and Code_Aster for Debian.
On the first, I am looking for testers for the package at
http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/opencascade/ . I am just now uploading -3
which should be fully usable, and only lacking a couple of copyright
issues before
names as libXmlPlugin and libBinPlugin.
I've just uploaded -4 sources and am building amd64 binaries; should be
ready in a few hours.
-Adam
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 17:55 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Greetings,
I am trying to package OpenCASCADE, Salomé and Code_Aster for Debian
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 18:34 +0100, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:06:35AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
D'oh! Brown bag time: -3 does not include the header files! I had put
the headers in their own directory and then forgot to add it to .files.
BTW, there's
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 18:42 +0100, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 12:12:32AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 18:34 +0100, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:06:35AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
D'oh! Brown bag time: -3 does
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 15:35 -0600, Jason Kraftcheck wrote:
Greetings,
I think the OpenCascade Debian packages would be more useful if they were
split up further, and slightly differently. I've included a description
of how I think the packages should be split, and a few scripts that will
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 09:31 -0600, Jason Kraftcheck wrote:
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Thanks for for considering splitting up the packages (and for packaging
OpenCascade). I will read the archive of the debian-science discussion
when I get a chance, but I haven't done so yet. Hopefully
Greetings,
I'm working on a Salomé package, which is taking a very long time for
several reasons.
* For some reason, make depend doesn't work, so I have to
hand-enter the dependencies and many of the required sources
* Upstream assumes modules are each configured, built and
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 19:23 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le vendredi 18 janvier 2008 à 12:58 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
Hello Sylvestre,
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 17:06 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le lundi 14 janvier 2008 à 10:56 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
On Mon, 2008
Hello Sylvestre,
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 17:06 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le lundi 14 janvier 2008 à 10:56 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 09:31 -0600, Jason Kraftcheck wrote:
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Thanks for for considering splitting up the packages
Hello again,
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 11:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Greetings,
I'm working on a Salomé package, which is taking a very long time for
several reasons.
So I completed the VTK 5 port, and built the package. I'm putting -3 up
at the usual place: http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 09:54 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 23:23 +0100, Frederic Lehobey wrote:
[snip]
By the way, as I am extremely busy these days I had not time to
answer to Adam Powell but I wish to congratulate him for his
impressive work on packaging
Greetings,
I just uploaded mpich 1.2.7-6 which builds with gfortran thanks to the
work of Kumar Appaiah. See bug 195509 for details.
This results in an interface change due to the gfortran transition, and
a lib name change, so if you have packages linked to it, you will need
to rebuild against
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: babel
Version: 1.2.0
Author: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories
Homepage: http://www.llnl.gov/CASC/components/babel.html
License: LGPL
Description: SIDL compiler and runtime
I used to maintain babel, an SIDL compiler and runtime environment.
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 10:37 +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
Hello,
Le mercredi 09 janvier 2008 à 00:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
Meanwhile, there's an earlier build error in Salomé on unstable, so it
doesn't even get to the _STL:: vs. std:: issue. It dies when trying to
compile
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 15:36 +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:23:31PM +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
From a first sight, it seems to me that replacing:
RefCountServantBase
with:
ServantBase
in Salomé files should be enough.
So the following pipeline
Hello Thomas,
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 09:23 +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
Hello Adam,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:29:11PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
So the following pipeline (modifying Salomé files, beware!), run from
Salomé toplevel directory, should work:
find -type f -print0
Wow, thank you again for your work on this!
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:48 +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 02:24:51PM +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
I'm currently trying to fully compile Salomé and will report to you next
failures.
I get the following error:
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 23:29 +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
Hello Adam,
Le mercredi 05 mars 2008 à 07:34 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
I'm not getting this error... I don't know why you would have seen that
MPI error, I'd patched openmpi before but upgrading to 1.2.5-2 undid my
patch
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 09:19 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 6 March 2008 at 09:28, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
| On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 23:29 +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
| Hello Adam,
|
| Le mercredi 05 mars 2008 à 07:34 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
| I'm not getting this error
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 09:28 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Okay, I've made it build as far as I can, into a number of similar
corrections in the SUPERV module. However, there's a sip/Qt error in
the GUI module:
/usr/bin/sip -t WS_X11 -t Qt_3_3_8b -x Qt_STYLE_INTERLACE -x
Qt_STYLE_WINDOWSXP
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 09:08 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 09:28 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Okay, I've made it build as far as I can, into a number of similar
corrections in the SUPERV module. However, there's a sip/Qt error in
the GUI module:
/usr/bin/sip -t
-lSMESHimpl). How is the
workaround?
As it seemes, you proceeded further.
Thanks and best regards, Dan
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
I am willing to help you with this, and tried to compile Salomé on my
system but got blocked before the step you reached. When compiling
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 18:56 +0200, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am packaging OpenCASCADE, a powerful computer-aided engineering (CAE)
...
The current package is at http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/opencascade/ .
Hi,
Has there been any progress on getting
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 21:25 +0200, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't had much time for this recently, but my todo list consists of:
* Switch to the tarball used by FreeBSD (and soon Gentoo) at:
ftp
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 15:09 +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
A Dilluns 21 Abril 2008, Adam C Powell IV va escriure:
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 21:25 +0200, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I haven't had much time
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 19:43 +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
A Dilluns 21 Abril 2008, Adam C Powell IV va escriure:
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 15:09 +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
A Dilluns 21 Abril 2008, Adam C Powell IV va escriure:
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 21:25 +0200, Teemu
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 18:47 +0200, Rafa Rodríguez Galván wrote:
Hello.
I agree with the previous e-mails and I think that the combination of
LaTeX + emacs is, in the long term, the best choice.
1. Formula editing is very efficient, I can even carry out my
deduction lively (and
Greetings,
I've (finally) begun the arduous task of auditing the copyright(s)/
license(s) in OpenCASCADE. Based on the number of files and
directories, this is bound to take a ton of time, so I'd appreciate some
help! I've also solicited help on the OpenCASCADE forum, where I've
been discussing
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 15:35 +0200, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've put a brief start (6 of the 536 directories in ros/src) in:
http://www.opennovation.org/audits/opencascade-6.2.txt and will update
it as I and others work
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 22:11 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Wed, 07 May 2008 12:27:08 -0400, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Greetings,
I've (finally) begun the arduous task of auditing the copyright(s)/
license(s) in OpenCASCADE. Based on the number of files
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 16:51 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 22:11 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Wed, 07 May 2008 12:27:08 -0400, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Greetings,
I've (finally) begun the arduous task of auditing the copyright(s)/
license
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 15:29 +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
This is a debian-user question. Learn to use 'apt-cache search' --
there must be at least a hundred packages in Debian for what you
describe, from note taking to mind mappming to personal wikis.
Don't abuse debian-science because
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 14:57 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 16:51 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 22:11 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Wed, 07 May 2008 12:27:08 -0400, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Greetings,
I've
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 19:01 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 09/06/2008, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And after three weeks in the NEW queue, OpenCASCADE was ACCEPTED this
morning into unstable! Yay!
Awesome! Good job! This means it will make it into lenny? Very
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 20:46 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 09/06/2008, Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The second reason is that although the OCTPL seems to be a free license,
upstream's interpretation of it is not. The paragraph starting with In
short on http
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 13:55 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
It would be nice to see science packages better categorised. I guess
this is ultimately best done using debtags.
For example http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/physics.php lists
packages to do Finite element analysis, optical
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 13:44 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Salome
to my knowledge Salome does not provide a fe code !
AFAICT from http://www.salome-platform.org/home/presentation/overview/
while salome doesn't perform FEA calculations, it
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 11:02 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 13:44 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Salome
to my knowledge Salome does not provide a fe code !
AFAICT
On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 19:28 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 11:02 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
And http://www.opennovation.org/ provides a much better categorisation
of engineering type packages than I did.
Categories
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 22:28 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
To follow Ondrej comment,
I have been in contact with some people close to the Salome project.
With almost the same ones we are going to
have a similar project to build a recently funded open platform
(OPUS) for uncertainty
Hi,
I'm in the process of adding a libmesh-doc binary package to libmesh,
but doxygen generates all of its docs in .php files. file:// links fail
to open these because the browser (Iceweasel) doesn't know what .php is.
I know nothing about PHP, so I figured Suggesting dwww and
Hi Christophe,
Sorry I didn't reply sooner, didn't read down far enough...
Let me first say I really appreciate your efforts to work with EDF to
open their software -- and perhaps the process for writing it. The
crown jewels of Code_Aster, Code_Saturne and Salomé with the MECA
modules are truly
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 23:55 +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081007 22:53]:
Also, having this would sense a clear signal to upstream authors that we
consider proper citing important and that enforcing citations in
copyright licensing is not the best thing to
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 14:20 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:19:25AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
The format of /usr/doc/package/references could be a popular one, for
instance BibTeX, if it allows cross references to other systems like
DOI, PubMed, ...)
I would
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 09:27 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 09:47:40AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
why not just adapt the existing doc-base format, adding a new BibTeX
files field? The description of which citation to use when (canonical
article(s
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 15:17 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:40:26AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
- Prepare files named 'reference' of 'citation' in the source package.
Did you mean 'reference' *or* 'citation'? As I argued elsewhere, I
think both are quite different,
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 21:36 +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 16.10.2008, 17:41 +0200 schrieb Michael Banck:
The problem I have with doc-base is that it is underused and not very
accessible. At least that is my impression of it as somebody who
doesn't care a lot about it from a
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 22:52 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 04:41:45PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
My idea was actually to have the citations.bib and/or references.bib
in /usr/share/doc/package as you say, and have the .doc-base file
include something like
Hi Andreas,
You replied to a message more than a week old, and missed an option
which came up last week, see below.
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 16:33 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote:
Sure. So, to summarize, we have the following options:
1. The
Hello,
Where can I get a recent ARPACK package? I know it's been removed from
main, but thought it should go into non-free soon, as it's been about
three months.
Thanks,
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 18:10 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Montag, den 10.11.2008, 10:05 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV:
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 22:21 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 03:29 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 06.11.2008, 19:30 -0500 schrieb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: elmerfem
Version: 5.4.1
Author: CSC -- IT Center for Science Ltd (Finnish Ministry of Education)
License: GPL
URL: http://www.csc.fi/elmer/
Elmer is an open source mutiphysics simulation package developed by CSC
in collaboration with Finnish
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 22:18 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
Hi,
I don't have anything to say about Elmer, but ...
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 02:01:52PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Elmer uses METIS (or its free counterpart Scotch) for mesh partitioning,
do you have some experience
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 22:10 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Montag, den 10.11.2008, 13:03 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV:
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 18:10 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Montag, den 10.11.2008, 10:05 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV:
[..]
One other thing: why is the ARPACK
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 08:05 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 09:55 +, Antonio Amorim wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
I have previously created a debian package for Elmer that does not
claim to fulfill the official debian policies but might be useful to
trigger
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 21:50 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:57:40 -0500 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
[...]
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 23:49 +0200, Mikko Lyly wrote:
[...]
Indeed, you're fine as far as your distribution is concerned; as far as
I can tell no GPL code in the fem
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 23:12 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Howdy,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 07:48:19PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
[Copying -beowulf as there's likely some interest there as well.]
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 15:21 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote:
When building against
Hello again,
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 15:10 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 08:05 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
[snip]
Thank you. I'm afraid I'm already well-enough along that the only issue
remaining is finding Scotch functions corresponding to
METIS_MeshPartNodes
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 23:06 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote:
[ Sorry for the long email! I wanted to express my view and as a
non-native speaker, it's not always easy to be precise. Hope you don't
mind. ]
No problem at all!
Am Dienstag, den 18.11.2008, 08:05 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: mpi-defaults
Version: 0.1
Author: Debian Science Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
License: Undetermined
This new source package will produce two binary meta-packages:
default-mpi-dev and default-mpi-bin which depend on libopenmpi-dev and
openmpi-bin
Hi again, and sorry for causing accidental posts to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I don't know how to do X-Debbugs-CC in
Evolution.
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 12:35 +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Manuel Prinz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 19.11.2008, 09:05 -0600
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 16:48 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 20.11.2008, 09:45 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV:
Feedback anyone?
I was just wondering why you depend on debhelper = 3, while compat is
set to 5. Souldn't you depend on = 5 then?
Not sure. My reasoning
On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 16:24 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Hi Adam,
I CCed you, because this information might be of some importance to you.
Am Donnerstag, den 06.11.2008, 19:30 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV:
Where can I get a recent ARPACK package? I know it's been removed from
main
Hello,
I've just finished re-doing the blacs and scalapack packages using
mpi-defaults. The results are in http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/mumps/
(since I'm using them for my not-yet-finished MUMPS package). They are
NMUs approved by the maintainer to close bugs 491028 and 491105.
If you maintain
Hi,
Last week OpenMPI transitioned to a new shared library package,
reflecting an ABI change to version 1.3.x (which wasn't reflected in the
shared lib package name of 1.3-2).
I went to rebuild my spooles package, only to find that there is already
a rebuild versioned 2.2-6+b1.
However, superlu
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 09:52 +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote:
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 19:00 -0400 schrieb Adam C Powell IV:
Last week OpenMPI transitioned to a new shared library package,
reflecting an ABI change to version 1.3.x (which wasn't reflected in the
shared lib package name of 1.3-2
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 21:35 -0400, Christopher Olah wrote:
Thanks for your responses!
David Joyner Wrote:
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/plot/plot3d/implicit_plot3d.html
sage's implicit plots seem perfect. Thanks!
Kapil Hari Paranjape Wrote:
Such plots are (in general)
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:00 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hi,
Last week OpenMPI transitioned to a new shared library package,
reflecting an ABI change to version 1.3.x (which wasn't reflected in the
shared lib package name of 1.3-2).
From what I can see, it looks like there are at least
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 20:10 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:00 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hi,
Last week OpenMPI transitioned to a new shared library package,
reflecting an ABI change to version 1.3.x (which wasn't reflected in the
shared
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
Package name: elmer-doc
Version: 2009.09.22
Author: CSC – IT Center for Science, Finland
License: CC-BY-ND 3.0
URL: http://www.csc.fi/elmer/
Description: Documentation for Elmer finite
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 16:27 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:19:11AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 16:47 -0800, Nicholas Breen wrote:
* is it too late in the release cycle to propose this as a release goal?
should squeeze+1 be the target
I generally agree, just a quick nit-pick/clarification:
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 20:56 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote:
* Alternatives need to be fixed. Besides what the bugs that
Nicholas referenced say, there are two other issues with those:
First, the priorities do not match
Greetings,
For those interested, I'm re-doing the Salomé .deb I started three years
ago. Salomé is a finite element pre-post processing framework, with a
lot of other things in there as well.
Though some things have improved between version 3.2.6 and 5.1.3, many
have not, so although this
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:28 +0100, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 02:29:03PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
For those interested, I'm re-doing the Salomé .deb I started three years
...
Because I can't do the whole package, I'm putting up the progress I've
-0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:28 +0100, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
Hi,
As part of the OpenHPC project[1], Logilab commited itself to package
Salomé for Debian. We had seen the great work you have done and are
glad that you are resuming it.
Wow, thank you
days ago, but that machine doesn't have enough disk
space to build the whole thing.)
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 11:45 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Now for one problem. The VISU module doesn't completely compile,
because of a symbol/prototype incompatibility within its CONVERTER
library. I don't
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 14:44 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello Adam,
Le lundi 08 février 2010 à 08:39 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
Hello,
Some time ago, the netlib and ATLAS implementations of BLAS and LAPACK
were ABI-compatible, and used alternatives symlinks to access
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 10:56 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:14:05AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I think it is rather the workflow you have to change which is sometimes
much harder. You have to remember to change the Vcs fields in the
control files of your
Hi,
I've been beating my head on $(wildcard...) in a rules file for nearly a
week now, and can't make any sense of it. The rules file is attached,
and lines 192-193 both have identical $(wildcard...) in them (copied
roughly from my babel package, where it works). When I run
git-buildpackage, it
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 18:10 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
There is not much progress so far with respect to changing mpi-defaults
to use MPICH2 instead of LAM on the architectures where Open MPI is not
available yet. This needs a round of binNMUs. Marc Brockschmidt said he
will look at
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 20:49 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 25/02/10 at 14:22 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 18:10 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
There is not much progress so far with respect to changing
mpi-defaults
to use MPICH2 instead of LAM
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:21 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le vendredi 26 février 2010 à 09:54 +, Alastair McKinstry a écrit :
Perhaps using pkg-config (an mpi.pc file) would be a better solution to
this; it is more
standard: the mpicc, etc. approach isn't very scalable, you can't
tags 563705 +patch
thanks
Hi and apologies for the long delay...
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 14:55 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 20:22 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 26/02/10 at 10:46 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 20:49 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote
, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hello André and list,
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 15:04 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
Dear list,
Now that salome-5.1.3-5 is running, I started a documentation on its
content and finally found a question on Debian package organization.
...
The current package
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 09:36 +0200, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:07:18PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Well done for this packaging!
Yep, nice job.
Thanks.
One more argument: we could plug Aster into Salome thanks to pylotage.
If we are lucky, it could even make
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:18 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
I can confirm that this is actually the reason why at Sanger Institute
(even if there are three DDs working) plain Debian (and specifically the
Debian Med packages) is not used.
FYI, I uploaded a new version of the Med packages on Monday
Hi Christophe,
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 12:35 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
Adam,
I certainly missed some emails but the recent petsc3.1 upload compiled
with
lam (and not the default openmi) provoked a massive breakage on my
side:
slepc and life (which uses also slepc).
Oh no!
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 08:31 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hi Christophe,
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 12:35 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
I managed to recompile life without slepc but I also use boost mpi
compiled (build-depending on) with mpi-default-dev (as well as life)
and combining
Hi Stefano,
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 14:27 +0200, Carsten Aulbert wrote:
On Thursday 27 May 2010 14:12:09 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
The post is at
http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2010/05/Debian-based_scientific_computin
g_at_EDF/ and kudos your work, so it's probably appropriate to mention
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 02:25 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 09:02:41AM +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
On my side life depends solely on mpi-default-dev, it seems that some other
package don't (e.g. hdf5), isn't it a problem ?
Yes, something like that is likely
regards
C.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Adam C Powell IV
hazel...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 02:25 -0500, Steve M. Robbins
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 09:02:41AM +0200, Christophe
Hi Christophe,
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 23:48 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
Hi Adam,
thanks for your answer !
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Adam C Powell IV
hazel...@debian.org wrote:
If mpi-default-dev points to lam, then why is OpenMPI
installed
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 13:04 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 06:05:05PM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
Hello:
For computational chemistry on the stable amd64 I needed yesterday
MPICH2. As the deb package is only in testing, I compiled MPICH2 for
stable, but the
Hi Christophe,
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 20:24 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
what are your plans regarding the build issue of petsc3.1 on hppa ?
I have no idea on how to resolve this issue. It seems to be a low-level
problem with python, and there was a suggestion that certain kernels
worked
-opt/lib directory is PETSC_LIB_DIR, but it must be
empty, because the corresponding directory in the package is empty.
Can someone else try to build it, and let me know what's in the
linux-gnu-c-opt/lib directory at the end?
Thanks,
Adam
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 08:46 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 23:11 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote:
Hello,
I'm having two problems with PETSc, and need some help.
Second, I just uploaded a new version, and although the build process
reports
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 18:32 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 23:11 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org
wrote:
Hello,
I'm having two problems with PETSc, and need some help.
Second, I
Hi,
I'd like to do a binNMU for ScaLAPACK to get rid of bug 589763.
Specifically, whoever uploaded ScaLAPACK appears to have built it with
libatlas-base-dev or something similar installed, so libscalapack-mpi1
depends on libatlas3gf-base .
But libatlas3gf-base breaks my build of Elmer, which
Hi Anton,
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 23:09 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi, all
gmsh of 2.5.0.dfsg-6 version has the following line in control file[1]:
libhdf5-mpi-dev[alpha amd64 i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
powerpc sparc],
As I understand, libhdf5-mpi-dev should be included only
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
