Re: epics-base_7.0.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 22/01 19:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > please also mention at least all licenses from modules/*/LICENSE in > your debian/copyright. Hi Thorsten, thanks for your review, and sorry for missing some licenses. Hopefully -2 (now in NEW) should be better. Cheers, -- Seb --

Re: nbsphinx-link_1.3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Thorsten, On 06/11 14:10, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > according to LICENSE the copyright holder is Simula Research > Laboratory. Who is Vidar Tonaas Fauske? He's the author listed in setup.py, and also the owner of the main github repository for nbsphinx-link. I've added the copyright notice

Re: opentsne_0.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 06/11 14:10, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > please also mention Patrick W. Daly, Peter Wilson and Donald Arseneau > in your debian/copyright. Hi Thorsten, thanks for the sharp eye, that's fixed in 0.5.0-2. Cheers, -- Seb -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Re: astra-toolbox_1.8.3-5_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Sean, On 03/03 00:00, Sean Whitton wrote: > One of our trainees noticed that many files in the project seems to be > GPL-3+ not GPL-3, and that d/c fails to mention one of the copyright > holders on very many of the files, CWI, Amsterdam. Indeed, thanks a lot for noticing this. I fixed this

Re: python-igor_0.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 28/10 22:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > shouldn't the license in your debian/copyright be better LGPL-3+? Hi Thorsten, I did hesitate quite a bit, as the first lines of the README file clearly state: :License: GNU General Public License, version 3+ However, I guess setup.py can be

Re: colorcet_2.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 02/09 20:10, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > shouldn't the license be "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 > International Public License" instead of BSD-3? Please also mention > colorcet-2.0.2/colorcet/sineramp.py Hi Thorsten, you're right, I mistakenly reused the copyright file from dials: sorry

Bug#968497: fixed in astra-toolbox 1.8.3-2

On 02/09 09:23, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > source only uploads for non-free are a sad story... Ah, forgot about that again. > I'll try to upload the binary shortly! Do you want me to do that today? Cheers, -- Seb -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Re: dials-data_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 13/07 22:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi Sebastien, > > please also mention the CC-BY 4.0 in your debian/copyright. Hi Thorsten, thanks for the thorough check, I had indeed missed those files. I've just uploaded 2.0.0-2 to fix that. Cheers, -- Seb -- debian-science-maintainers mailing