Bug#1072183: fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS with nanobind 2.0

2024-06-07 Thread Timo Röhling
plex (<< 1:0.8.0-8) = I just uploaded nanobind 2.0.0-2 with your suggested Breaks. It feels very hackish, though. I hope we can come up with a more elegant solution for future ABI breaks. Cheers Timo -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭────╮

Bug#1072183: fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS with nanobind 2.0

2024-05-29 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: fenics-dolfinx Version: 1:0.8.0-6 Severity: serious Tags: patch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, upgrading to nanobind 2.0 made your package FTBFS. I am sorry that I did not check this before uploading to unstable, that is on me. I have seen that

Bug#1071463: pygmsh: autopkgtest regression with pytest 8 on i386

2024-05-19 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: pygmsh Version: 7.1.17-4 Severity: serious User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org Usertags: bsp-2024-05-mdc-ber -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, your package starting hanging in the autopkgtest on i386 with pytest 8, resulting in a timeout. See

Bug#1067234: symfit: autopkgtest regression with NumPy 1.26

2024-03-20 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: symfit Version: 0.5.6-2 Severity: serious -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, your package has an autopkgtest regression with NumPy 1.26. Hopefully relevant excerpt from the test log: 130s # Should no longer raise warnings, because internally we

Bug#1058805: python3-open3d: SyntaxError: f-string: expecting '=', or '!', or ':', or '}'

2023-12-16 Thread Timo Röhling
Package: python3-open3d Version: 0.17.0+ds-8+b1 Severity: serious -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Since the last binNMU, python3-open3d fails to configure at install time: Setting up python3-open3d (0.17.0+ds-8+b1) ...

Bug#1038883: dolfin: autopkgtest failure due to bytes as docstring

2023-06-22 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: dolfin Version: 2019.2.0~git20230116.bd54183-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, your package fails the autopkgtest with the new pytest 7.3 because

Bug#1036879: oce: should this package be removed for trixie?

2023-05-28 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: oce Version: 0.18.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: trixie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-removal Control: block -1 by 1036878 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, the package src:oce has just the single reverse dependency src:horizon-eda, which also

Bug#1036843: coin3: autopkgtest regression due to new CMake warning

2023-05-27 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: coin3 Version: 4.0.0+ds-3 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, starting with CMake 3.26, a new warning is issued if cmake_minimum_required() is not called before project(), as some policy settings affect the behavior of project(). Your

Bug#1028430: spyder-kernels: flaky autopkgtest: test_dask_multiprocessing AssertionError

2023-01-10 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: spyder-kernels Version: 2.3.3-1 Severity: important User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: flaky X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, the spyder-kernels autopkgtest exhibits intermittent failures in testing:

Bug#1019115: open3d: Switch libmsgpack-dev to libmsgpack-cxx-dev

2022-09-06 Thread Timo Röhling
to switch to libmsgpack-cxx-dev. I'm waiting for the draco transition to complete, then I'll upload a fixed version. Cheers Timo -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭╮ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1

Bug#996956: libbenchmark-dev: libbenchmark_main.a has no actual object code

2021-10-21 Thread Timo Röhling
builds. Cheers Timo -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭────╮ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1 23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │ ⠈⠳⣄ ╰╯ signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- debian-science-maintainers mailing

Bug#996956: libbenchmark-dev: libbenchmark_main.a has no actual object code

2021-10-21 Thread Timo Röhling
cc-ar) Cheers Timo -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭────╮ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1 23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │ ⠈⠳⣄ ╰╯ signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- debian-science-maintainers

Bug#994488: alglib: autopkgtest regression with CMake 3.19+

2021-09-16 Thread Timo Röhling
on the discussion on debian-science@, I'll go ahead and fix it directly, no action required on your part. Sorry for the noise. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭╮ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1 23BF CC8C

Bug#994488: alglib: autopkgtest regression with CMake 3.19+

2021-09-16 Thread Timo Röhling
picked because it is the CMake version in oldoldstable. As I am a member of the Science Team, I can also fix and upload this for you if you are starved for developer time; just give me the green light. Cheers Timo -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭╮ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo

Bug#990397: What are the development priorities for the csironn library? (was Bug#990397: depends on deprecated qhull library)

2021-07-04 Thread Timo Röhling
tement), so the transition is still beneficial (IMHO), but not urgent. Cheers Timo [1] https://sources.debian.org/src/qhull/2020.2-3/debian/patches/0006-Build-deprecated-libqhull-for-now.patch/ -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭────

Bug#990402: depends on deprecated qhull library

2021-06-28 Thread Timo Röhling
Package: src:getfem++ Version: 5.3+dfsg1-3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: roehl...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear Maintainer, your package builds and links against the non-reentrant version of Qhull, which has been deprecated by Qhull upstream and is likely to

Bug#990401: depends on deprecated qhull library

2021-06-28 Thread Timo Röhling
Package: src:meshlab Version: 2020.09+dfsg1-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: roehl...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear Maintainer, your package builds and links against the non-reentrant version of Qhull, which has been deprecated by Qhull upstream and is likely

Bug#990399: depends on deprecated qhull library

2021-06-28 Thread Timo Röhling
Package: src:pcl Version: 1.11.1+dfsg-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: roehl...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear Maintainer, your package builds and links against the non-reentrant version of Qhull, which has been deprecated by Qhull upstream and is likely to

Bug#990397: depends on deprecated qhull library

2021-06-28 Thread Timo Röhling
Package: src:plplot Version: 5.15.0+dfsg-19 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: roehl...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear Maintainer, your package builds and links against the non-reentrant version of Qhull, which has been deprecated by Qhull upstream and is likely to

Bug#990396: depends on deprecated qhull library

2021-06-28 Thread Timo Röhling
Package: src:pymca Version: 5.6.3+dfsg-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: roehl...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear Maintainer, your package builds and links against the non-reentrant version of Qhull, which has been deprecated by Qhull upstream and is likely to

Bug#990395: depends on deprecated qhull library

2021-06-28 Thread Timo Röhling
Package: src:3depict Version: 0.0.22-2 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: roehl...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear Maintainer, your package builds and links against the non-reentrant version of Qhull, which has been deprecated by Qhull upstream and is likely to

Bug#990392: depends on deprecated qhull library

2021-06-28 Thread Timo Röhling
Package: src:tulip Version: 5.4.0+dfsg-3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: roehl...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear Maintainer, your package builds and links against the non-reentrant version of Qhull, which has been deprecated by Qhull upstream and is likely to

Bug#897707: Should this package be removed from Debian?

2021-06-21 Thread Timo Röhling
. Cheers Timo -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭╮ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1 23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │ ⠈⠳⣄ ╰╯ signature.asc Description

Bug#988869: libqhull-doc: broken symlinks: /usr/share/doc/libqhull-dev/qhull/src/libqhull_r/*.h -> ../../../../../../include/libqhull_r/*.h

2021-06-02 Thread Timo Röhling
. What do you think? Cheers Timo -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭╮ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1 23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA

Bug#973290: ros-ros ftbfs in unstable with python3.9

2020-11-03 Thread Timo Röhling
Control: reassign -1 cmake-extras Control: merge 973291 -1 Control: affects 973291 + src:ros-ros Hi Matthias, On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:45:53 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote: > to reproduce, you can use the repositories found at: > > deb [trusted=yes] http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/python3.9 ./ >

Bug#973095: ros-angles: FTBFS: make[5]: *** No rule to make target 'gmock/libgmock.a', needed by 'devel/lib/angles/utest'. Stop.

2020-11-03 Thread Timo Röhling
Control: reassign -1 cmake-extras Control: reassign 973291 cmake-extras Control: merge -1 973291 Control: affects -1 + src:ros-angles src:ros-rospack Dear cmake-extras maintainers, I believe bugs #973095 and #973291 can be traced back to your package: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid,

Bug#956462: pkg-config for Qhull

2020-04-25 Thread Timo Röhling
Control: fixed -1 5.5.5+dfsg-2 Thanks for the quick response! And I think you have a bug number typo in your changelog, but that other bug was done anyway. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

Bug#956462: pkg-config for Qhull

2020-04-25 Thread Timo Röhling
Hi Frédéric! On 12.04.20 14:22, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > I will add both path in order to make the package backportable :) > Just pinging: Can you prepare an upload soon(ish), so I can continue with the Qhull transition? The "new" include path will work with the current 2015.2 release,

Bug#958332: gazebo: Unvendor tinyobjloader

2020-04-20 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: gazebo Version: 11.0.0+dfsg-3 Severity: wishlist Dear maintainer, I wanted to let you know that I have packaged the tinyobjloader library recently, which is also vendored with your package. You may want to unvendor tinyobjloader in one of your future releases. Cheers Timo --

Bug#958328: ignition-common: Unvendor tinyobjloader

2020-04-20 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: ignition-common Version: 3.5.0+dfsg-3 Severity: wishlist Dear maintainer, I wanted to let you know that I have packaged the tinyobjloader library recently, which is also vendored with your package. You may want to unvendor tinyobjloader in one of your future releases. Cheers Timo --

Bug#958319: h5py: Unvendor liblzf

2020-04-20 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: h5py Version: 2.10.0-7 Severity: wishlist Dear maintainer, I wanted to let you know that I have packaged the liblzf library recently, which is also vendored with your package. You may want to unvendor liblzf in one of your future releases. Cheers Timo -- debian-science-maintainers

Bug#956462: pymca: FTBFS with Qhull 2019.1

2020-04-11 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: pymca Version: 5.5.4+dfsg-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs, patch Dear maintainer, your package uses a deprecated include path for Qhull, which will no longer build with the latest release. Attached is a patch that will fix the build with the qhull package in experimental. ---

Bug#956460: 3depict: FTBFS with Qhull 2019.1

2020-04-11 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: 3depict Version: 0.0.22-1.2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs, patch Dear maintainer, your package uses a deprecated include path for Qhull, which will no longer build with the latest release. I took the liberty to report this to upstream already. Attached is a patch that will fix the

Bug#925540: qhull: add libqhullcpp to installed libraries

2020-03-10 Thread Timo Röhling
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:26:51 +0100 Timo Röhling wrote: > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/qhull I took the liberty and prepared a Merge Request that will fix this bug: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/qhull/-/merge_requests/2 I hope it is useful. -Timo -- debian-science-maintain

Bug#925540: qhull: add libqhullcpp to installed libraries

2020-03-09 Thread Timo Röhling
Hi everyone, I'm also affected by this bug. On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 19:08:23 +0100 D Haley wrote: > However, Policy (8.3) [2] is that the static may be installed, > particularly if the ABI is unstable, but doesn't really say anything > about not installing the static at all? > [...] > So we could