Dear Anton,
It seems that al test on pysph are passing now [1].
Would you like to got on with the upload to unstable?
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pysph=experimental
kind regards
antonio
Il 07/02/21 20:46, Anton Gladky ha scritto:
Hi Antonio,
uploaded!
Anton
Thanks Anton,
Il 07/02/21 20:46, Anton Gladky ha scritto:
Hi Antonio,
uploaded!
Anton
It seems thet the fix works properly.
There are still a couple of buuilds missing in this moment,
ciao
antonio
Am So., 7. Feb. 2021 um 10:54 Uhr schrieb Antonio Valentino <
Hi Frederic,
Il 07/02/21 11:25, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel ha scritto:
Sorry I would have said antonio, it seems that the build failed on salsa ???
yes we noticed the issue.
I think that it is a problem related to the configuration of the VM used
for CI.
Indeed I'm able to build the package
Sorry I would have said antonio, it seems that the build failed on salsa ???
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Hello anton,
is it normal ?
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/pysph/-/jobs/1420077
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Dear Anton,
thanks a lot for sponsoring the previous upload.
Now I finally received form upstream a patch that actually fixes #948736.
It is the lat RC bug remaining for pysph.
I have prepared a new version of the package including the patch.
As for the previous upload the build in CI fails so
Dear Anton,
Il 30/01/21 19:37, Anton Gladky ha scritto:
Hi Antonio,
I have just tried to build pysph, but tests are failing. The same
is in CI-pipelines. Could you please check?
The failure in CI is expected IMHO for i386 because
libtrilinos-zoltan-dev an all dependent packages are not
Hi Antonio,
I have just tried to build pysph, but tests are failing. The same
is in CI-pipelines. Could you please check?
Anton
Am Di., 8. Dez. 2020 um 09:26 Uhr schrieb Antonio Valentino <
antonio.valent...@tiscali.it>:
> Hi Anton,
>
> Il 05/12/20 21:53, Anton Gladky ha scritto:
> > Am Sa.,
Hi Anton,
Il 05/12/20 21:53, Anton Gladky ha scritto:
Am Sa., 5. Dez. 2020 um 21:46 Uhr schrieb Antonio Valentino
:
Shall I remove the sponsor request form SoB until [1] is fixed?
Just let me know, when the package is in buildable state.
Now numcodecs builds again.
I have also bumped the
Il 05/12/20 21:53, Anton Gladky ha scritto:
Am Sa., 5. Dez. 2020 um 21:46 Uhr schrieb Antonio Valentino
:
Shall I remove the sponsor request form SoB until [1] is fixed?
Just let me know, when the package is in buildable state.
Regards
Anton
OK, thanks
--
Antonio Valentino
Am Sa., 5. Dez. 2020 um 21:46 Uhr schrieb Antonio Valentino
:
>
> Shall I remove the sponsor request form SoB until [1] is fixed?
>
Just let me know, when the package is in buildable state.
Regards
Anton
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Dear Anton,
Il 05/12/20 21:03, Anton Gladky ha scritto:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> I have uploaded the new version of zarr package into the unstable.
>
thanks a lot.
> For the package numcodecs I have enabled ci-pipeline on the salsa and it
> looks like some tests are failing [1].
>
> Could you
12 matches
Mail list logo
