Bug#1064982: gnuplot-qt: gnuplot displays a window with nothing in it

Hi Vincent, thanks a lot for this deep dive into the problem! Really appreciate it! Best regards Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#1061200: transition: vtk9

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: v...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:vtk9 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear release team, please schedule vtk9.3 transition. Ben file:

Bug#1059961: transition: benchmark

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: benchm...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:benchmark -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear release team, please schedule a tiny benchmark

Bug#1055972: UDD link update

https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=ftbfs-boost183-transition=gl...@debian.org=1=1=1=1#results -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: heavy dependencies of libvtk-dev

Hi Johannes, packaging of the vtk9 is placed here [1]. If you have some technical solution, how to solve the issue, feel free to contribute. Yes, vtk9 is a large package. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/vtk9 Best regards Anton Am Mo., 23. Okt. 2023 um 20:22 Uhr schrieb Johannes

Bug#1053912: transition: alglib

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: alg...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:alglib -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Please schedule the transition of alglib. All reverse

Bug#1050019: Reporting an issue

forwarded 1050019 https://github.com/google/cctz/issues/274 thanks Hi, I have reported the issue here [1] [1] https://github.com/google/cctz/issues/274 Best regards Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

Bug#1027965: Fix for the RC bug in vtk

Adding ciruclar dependencies is what we do want to avoid. It looks like gdcm has already explicit dep on vtk9-qt-dev, thus closing the ticket. Regards Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

Re: Fix for the RC bug in vtk

Hi Steven. thanks for the notice! vtk9 upload is in my todo list for the next few days. Regards Anton Am So., 5. Feb. 2023 um 17:30 Uhr schrieb Steven Robbins : > > Hello, > > Was looking yesterday for an RC bug to fix and noticed #1027965 against VTK -- > a build failure in gdcm caused by

Bug#1013158: facet-analyser: vtk[6,7] removal

Hi Picca, I have just successfully cloned the git-repo. I have only got a warning "[attr]our-c-style whitespace=tab-in-indent format.clang-format=9 n" but I thinking it is not critical. Please try to checkout it again. Maybe it was salsa issue? Regards Anton Am Di., 1. Nov. 2022 um 10:18

Bug#1013616: Thanks

Thanks, Jonathan, for the patch! Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#1019061: Done

gnuplot-data is built. Thus closing. Cheers Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#1019061: Root cause is #1019061

Hi, thanks for bug report. The main problem is #1017698. Gnuplot cannot be built due to missing build-dep on emacs-nox. Regards Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

DebConf22, Debian Science BoF

Dear all, this year we are organizing Debian Science BoF during Debconf22. It is scheduled [0]: Type: BoF (45 minutes) Room: Ereniku Time: Jul 22 (Fri): 15:00 Please use this link to add some topics to discuss [1]. It is planned to have an informal talk about Debian Science Team activities

Bug#1013158: facet-analyser: vtk[6,7] removal

Hi Picca, thanks for your work! Yes, it is known issue that the paraview uses an embedded version of VTK. As far as I remember there were several tries to fix it, though without visible success. Please file the bug against paraview or just add those dependencies into the git of paraview, so it

Bug#1009739: fixed in yade 2022.01a-8

Hi Bernhard, I think one can ask the corresponding arm-mailing list. Anyway, if you have a solution for that I could test it first on the real hardware. Thanks Anton Am Mi., 1. Juni 2022 um 00:12 Uhr schrieb Bernhard Übelacker : > > Hello Anton, > I am happy if my work helps. > And I am

Bug#1009739: fixed in yade 2022.01a-8

Hi Bernhard, Thank you very much for this information and for fixing it! I have just uploaded boost1.74_1.74.0-15 with this fix and will revert the workaround in yade! Best regards Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

Bug#1001484: sfepy: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.10: Sequence' from 'collections' is removed

I will do it ASAP Anton Am Do., 24. März 2022 um 18:54 Uhr schrieb Stefano Rivera : > > Control: tag -1 + pending > > I see a commit fixing this in git, just waiting to be uploaded. > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/sfepy/-/commit/f6a4f8d2435e8406a629a75ee89891a24631233a > > SR > > -- >

Re: opm-upscaling_2021.10-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

merged in 2018 and became NORCE. In the source files sometimes the old > names or former >institutions are mentioned in the copyright notices. > > Markus > > Am Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 08:35:29PM +0100 schrieb Anton Gladky: > >Hi Markus, > > > >please prepa

Re: opm-upscaling_2021.10-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Markus, please prepare update, push into salsa and I will reuploaded rejected packages. Thanks Thorsten for your work! Anton Am Sa., 22. Jan. 2022 um 20:22 Uhr schrieb Markus Blatt : > > Hi, > > Thanks a lot for the review Thorsten. > > actually they are called Equinor AS now: >

Re: [ITA] triangle

Hi Antonio, package is currently under QA-group, so feel free to adopt it. Regards Anton Am Sa., 18. Dez. 2021 um 19:15 Uhr schrieb Antonio Valentino : > > Dear all, > I would like to adopt triangle (non-free) [1] and maintain it under the > Debian Science umbrella. > I have found already a

Bug#984232: status

This bug is fixed. I followed the advice from Adrian and now the package builds fine. Regards Anton Am Sa., 18. Dez. 2021 um 01:39 Uhr schrieb Ryan Pavlik : > > The updated package just needs the copyright file updated and reviewed. If > you'd like a fix uploaded before I get a chance to do

Bug#1000611: libvtk9{,-qt}: soname change without library transition

Hi Adrian, thanks for the bug report. It was really an accidental upload into unstable instead of experimental. Yes, I will rename the package and upload it ASAP. Regards Anton Am Do., 25. Nov. 2021 um 22:03 Uhr schrieb Adrian Bunk : > > Package: libvtk9 > Version: 9.1.0+dfsg2-2 > Severity:

Re: Comments regarding alglib_3.18.0-1~exp1_amd64.changes

Thanks for the valuable link dated 2004! I have updated the test of the license in git, including the link. https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/alglib/-/commit/894d5d4850f9fd5bf920e6a892b52d56ecf753ae Regards Anton Am So., 21. Nov. 2021 um 19:19 Uhr schrieb Thorsten Alteholz : > > Hi Anton,

Re: alglib_3.18.0-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hello Thorsten, thanks for careful review! I am maintaining the package for many years and could not imagine that some copyright notices are in the middle of the long file. Thanks and updated package is reuploaded. Anton Am So., 21. Nov. 2021 um 18:01 Uhr schrieb Thorsten Alteholz : > > >

Bug#994405: libgmp10:i386: buffer overflow due to integer overflow in mpz/inp_raw.c on 32-bit machines

CVE-2021-43618 is assigned to this issue. Adrian Bunk schrieb am Sa., 13. Nov. 2021, 21:09: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 07:02:48AM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: > > Thanks, Vincent, for the information. I would still wait for CVE, > > so we can apply a patch and track vulnerab

Bug#994405: libgmp10:i386: buffer overflow due to integer overflow in mpz/inp_raw.c on 32-bit machines

Thanks, Vincent, now I am able to reproduce the issue! I will request CVE. Regards Anton Am So., 14. Nov. 2021 um 15:44 Uhr schrieb Vincent Lefevre : > > On 2021-11-14 14:15:25 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > well, I was thinking that upstream should request a CVE. Neverheless

Bug#994405: libgmp10:i386: buffer overflow due to integer overflow in mpz/inp_raw.c on 32-bit machines

Hi Adrian, well, I was thinking that upstream should request a CVE. Neverheless I could not reproduce the issue with the modern GCC-versions. Even on 32bit-systems. Regards Anton Am Sa., 13. Nov. 2021 um 21:09 Uhr schrieb Adrian Bunk : > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 07:02:48AM +0200, Anton

Re: gmsh_4.8.4+ds1-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Thorsten, thanks for this information! I removed some libraries and used a packaged versions, updated d/copyright and uploaded again. Thank you Anton Am Sa., 6. Nov. 2021 um 00:00 Uhr schrieb Thorsten Alteholz : > > > Hi Anton, > > I am afraid you need to rework your debian/copyright a

Bug#998411: Bug#996204: transition: numerical library stack: hypre SONAME (Policy 8.1)

I have fixed gmsh. It will appear in NEW soon. Regards Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#997664: sundials: apparent ABI bumps in sundials5 library packages

Hi Drew, Thanks for the catch! yes, library splitting is somehow strange in this package. We should probably split it in much more sublibs to escape such situations in the future. Regards Anton Drew Parsons schrieb am So., 24. Okt. 2021, 02:18: > Source: sundials > Version: 5.7.0+dfsg-1 >

Bug#996976: vtk6: Remove vtk6 from the Debian 12

Source: vtk6 Severity: serious vtk has now 3 versions in archive: vtk6, vtk7 and vtk9. Intention is to remove older unsupported versions in favour of cyrrent vtk9. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

Bug#994882: ITS: vitables

Hi Benda! Thanks for your contribution. I have approved and merged your MR. Also I have added you to the Debian Science group on salsa. @PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel , would you want also to check those changes? Best regards Anton Am Mi., 22. Sept. 2021 um 16:18 Uhr schrieb Benda Xu : > Package:

Bug#994405: libgmp10:i386: buffer overflow due to integer overflow in mpz/inp_raw.c on 32-bit machines

-09-16 21:23:34 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: > > Thanks for the bug report. We will fix it when CVE (if any) will be > > assigned and upstream patch will be available. > > FYI, an upstream patch is now available here: > > https://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-bugs/2021-S

Bug#994405: libgmp10:i386: buffer overflow due to integer overflow in mpz/inp_raw.c on 32-bit machines

Control: severity -1 important Control: notfound -1 2:6.2.1+dfsg-2 Control: found -1 2:6.2.1+dfsg-1 Thanks for the bug report. We will fix it when CVE (if any) will be assigned and upstream patch will be available. Though, the integer overflows are not making the package unusable in most cases.

Bug#994488: alglib: autopkgtest regression with CMake 3.19+

Hi Timo, thanks for the patch! Yes, feel free to upload it. Please update git and tag a new upload. Regards Anton Am Do., 16. Sept. 2021 um 18:15 Uhr schrieb Timo Röhling < roehl...@debian.org>: > Package: src:alglib > Version: 3.17.0-2 > Tag: patch > > Dear maintainer, > > the alglib

Bug#788411: Please update the patch

Anton Am Mo., 6. Sept. 2021 um 08:11 Uhr schrieb Helmut Grohne : > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +pending > > Hi Anton, > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:44:34PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: > > It looks like the symbol-file cannot be applied any more. > > Yes, it (the shell

Bug#788411: Please update the patch

control: tags -1 +moreinfo Thanks for the patch! It looks like the symbol-file cannot be applied any more. Could you please update it, if this bug is still relevant? If not - please close it. Thanks. Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Bug#962728: F3D

Hello Francois, I will take a look in the next few days. Regards Anton Am So., 22. Aug. 2021 um 01:57 Uhr schrieb François Mazen : > Hello Sylwester, > > Thanks for your interest in F3D, I'm working on the packaging of this > software [1]. > > The package is already on mentors [2], so let's

Re: gl2ps_1.4.2+dfsg1-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Hi Nilesh, thanks for your upload! Please coordinate uploads next time with the developer, listed in d/control, especially if you did not communicate with them before. Thanks again. Regards Anton Am So., 15. Aug. 2021 um 20:49 Uhr schrieb Debian FTP Masters <

Re: GTS utils transform manpage

Hello Daniel, thanks for your information! Could you please file a bug, so it can possibly be fixed in the next upload? Regards Anton Am Di., 3. Aug. 2021 um 16:34 Uhr schrieb Daniel Karbach : > Hello Science Team, > > I was just reading the manpage for transform(1) from the libgts-bin

Bug#961183: metis: providing a 64-bit build

Hi Drew, > Would you like me to push to salsa (experimental branch) for inspection? Yes, please. Anton Am So., 13. Juni 2021 um 01:24 Uhr schrieb Drew Parsons : > Package: metis > Followup-For: Bug #961183 > > Hi Anton, I've prepared packaging for a 64-bit that I'm happy to push > (and

Bug#961183: metis: providing a 64-bit build

Well, theoretically we can do it. But we need to do some kind of a transition for all dependencies. Regards Anton Am Sa., 5. Juni 2021 um 13:36 Uhr schrieb Drew Parsons : > ... > I think the best solution is to "break" the builds of client > applications by moving the standard header from

Bug#987921: [RFS] Re: Bug#987921: linbox FTBFS on 32bit with gcc 10

Your changes look good. Let's wait for approval by release team not to pollute unstable by unapproved uploads. Regards Anton Am Mo., 10. Mai 2021 um 11:40 Uhr schrieb Torrance, Douglas < dtorra...@piedmont.edu>: > On Sun 09 May 2021 05:16:38 PM EDT, Anton Gladky wrote: > >

Bug#987921: [RFS] Re: Bug#987921: linbox FTBFS on 32bit with gcc 10

Hi Doug, I will review/upload the package tomorrow, Please file a pre-approval request against release.debian.org. Thanks Regards Anton Am So., 9. Mai 2021 um 22:48 Uhr schrieb Torrance, Douglas < dtorra...@piedmont.edu>: > Control: tags -1 pending > > On Sun 02 May 2021 12:46:50 AM EDT,

Bug#988239: Pending

tags 988239 +pending thanks https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/libgetdata/-/commit/d874e3e63fc9c5c5f3008e9803aa1976cc222125 Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

Re: Try not to break packages in a freeze phase [was: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg2-9_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable]

Hi, is there any success in fixing of an RC-critical bug? If it is difficult, I would suggest to revert all changes and upload the previous state of the package. Best Regards Anton Am Sa., 20. Feb. 2021 um 15:09 Uhr schrieb Shayan Doust < he...@shayandoust.me>: > Hello Anton, > > > 1)

Re: Try not to break packages in a freeze phase [was: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg2-9_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable]

Thanks for a quick reply. I can just recommend to use salsa CI pipelines. It works pretty good and tests the package in different environments. But I am afraid, vtk is too large for the usual builders. Best regards Anton Shayan Doust schrieb am Sa., 20. Feb. 2021, 15:09: > Hello Anton, > >

Try not to break packages in a freeze phase [was: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg2-9_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable]

Hi Shayan, thanks a lot for working on Debian Science packages! Though I would like to note a couple of points: 1) Please try to test the package as good as possible before uploading. vtk7 fails to build on all binary uploads #983167. Please try to fix it. 2) We are in a freeze now before

Re: zarr and numcodecs sponsorship

Hi Antonio, I have just tried to build pysph, but tests are failing. The same is in CI-pipelines. Could you please check? Anton Am Di., 8. Dez. 2020 um 09:26 Uhr schrieb Antonio Valentino < antonio.valent...@tiscali.it>: > Hi Anton, > > Il 05/12/20 21:53, Anton Gladky ha scr

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

You are welcome! There is a build problem on arm64 "96 - ContactTest (Timeout)". Please fix or disable this only test. I have restarted the build but it did not succeed. Regards Anton Am So., 24. Jan. 2021 um 17:54 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair : > > Great, thank you Anton, I don't think I

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

it is not an easy one. In the meantime the package > is very useful for x86_64 users, who are in the majority. > > regards, > Steve > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:36 PM Anton Gladky wrote: > > > > Hi Stephen, > > > > I have enabled the salsa-pipeline on siconos pac

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

ools to all. >* Add debian/upstream/metadata. >* Replace debian/compat with debhelper-compat package. > > > regards, > Steve > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 9:27 PM Anton Gladky wrote: > > > > Dear members of Debian Science Team, > > > > we are approac

Re: Sponsoring before freeze

an example of a package that uses autopkgtest in a > cmake with ctest context in mind, this could help. > > Kind regards > > Thomas > > Le 18/01/2021 à 22:24, Anton Gladky a écrit : > > Hi Thomas, > > > > uploaded! Thanks for your contribution. > > >

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

e a review and sponsoring. I've > > done basic testing of the package myself, especially the parts that are > > affected by patches/repack, and it seems to work well to me. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Ryan > > > > On 1/16/2021 12:09 PM, Anton Glad

Re: Sponsoring before freeze

Hi Thomas, uploaded! Thanks for your contribution. Please consider adding autopkgtest for the next upload. If you prepare them before freeze, please let me know and I will upload it. Regards Anton Am Do., 14. Jan. 2021 um 00:39 Uhr schrieb Thomas Schiex : > > Dear Anton, > > I have tried to

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

let me know. Best regards Anton Anton Am Do., 14. Jan. 2021 um 00:33 Uhr schrieb Ryan Pavlik : > > > On 1/9/2021 2:27 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: > > Dear members of Debian Science Team, > > > > we are approaching to a new stable release freeze. If youhave some > >

Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

Dear members of Debian Science Team, we are approaching to a new stable release freeze. If youhave some packages to be sponsored, please let us know. I have a very limited time, but I will try to review/sponsor someof packages. Best regards Anton OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP

Bug#979306: QVTKOpenGLWidget.h: No such file or directory

Hi Drew, this header is according to documentation deprecated. I tried to use the proposed header, but some more changes in the code are needed. Please verify it and close the bug, if nothing more can be done on vtk9 side. Regards Anton Am Di., 5. Jan. 2021 um 23:49 Uhr schrieb Drew Parsons :

Bug#979306: QVTKOpenGLWidget.h: No such file or directory

Hi Drew, could you please push the version of avogadrolibs which your working on into the git? So I could probably test it against newer vtk9. Thanks. Regards Anton Am Di., 5. Jan. 2021 um 05:09 Uhr schrieb Drew Parsons : > > Package: libvtk9-qt-dev > Version: 9.0.1+dfsg1-6 > Severity: normal

Bug#978088: HELP needed for uploading a new debianisation 7.1-3 of the Rheolef package

Hi Pierre, sure, I will! Please push your changes in master-branch. It looks only the tags were pushed. Regards Anton Am Sa., 2. Jan. 2021 um 19:41 Uhr schrieb Pierre Saramito : > > Hi Anton, hi all, > > I just commit with git a new release 7.1-3 of the debianisation > of the rheolef package:

Bug#975660: Raising the bug's severity

severity 975430 serious severity 975588 serious severity 975593 serious severity 975660 serious severity 975665 serious severity 975666 serious severity 975667 serious severity 975672 serious severity 975863 serious thanks boost1.74 is already default in unstable. Thus raising the bug's severity.

Re: zarr and numcodecs sponsorship

Am Sa., 5. Dez. 2020 um 21:46 Uhr schrieb Antonio Valentino : > > Shall I remove the sponsor request form SoB until [1] is fixed? > Just let me know, when the package is in buildable state. Regards Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

zarr and numcodecs sponsorship

Hi Antonio, I have uploaded the new version of zarr package into the unstable. For the package numcodecs I have enabled ci-pipeline on the salsa and it looks like some tests are failing [1]. Could you please check, whether those failures are reproducible? [1]

Bug#975660: scram: FTBFS against boost_1.74

Package: scram Version: 0.16.2-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org Usertags: boost174 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, it was discovered that your package failed to build against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most

Bug#975268: gazebo: FTBFS against boost_1.74

Package: gazebo Version: 11.1.0+dfsg-3 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org Usertags: boost174 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, it was discovered that your package failed to build against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most

Bug#975267: freecad: FTBFS against boost_1.74

Package: freecad Version: 0.18.4+dfsg2-5 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org Usertags: boost174 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, it was discovered that your package failed to build against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1].

Bug#974947: dolfin: FTBFS against boost_1.74

Hi Drew, The patch works for both versions, so it shoe safely be applied by upstream. That is the reason why i decided to make this minimal team upload. But reverted it because of FTBFS. Regards Anton Drew Parsons schrieb am Mi., 18. Nov. 2020, 10:39: > Source: dolfin > Followup-For: Bug

Bug#974948: Patch

tags 974948 + patch thanks The fix is available here [1]. It was reverted because of #975012 but it looks those two bugs are independent. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/fenics/dolfin/-/commit/972649229ed95ad3dad2abc4000133b86d192c8e Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing

Bug#975012: dplfin: FTBFS: 69% tests passed, 15 tests failed out of 49

Hi Sebastian, Thanks for your bug report. I am preparing a transition to boost 1.74 and tested my minimal changes to fix #974948. It worked locally. Anyway I have reverted the fix for #974948 and it did not help. So the reason is somewhere else. Sorry for the inconvenience. Best regards Anton

Bug#974948: dolfin: FTBFS against boost_1.74

Package: dolfin Version: 2019.2.0~git20200629.946dbd3-5 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org Usertags: boost174 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, it was discovered that your package failed to build against boost_1.74. Logs can be

Bug#974947: dolfin: FTBFS against boost_1.74

Package: dolfin Version: 2019.2.0~git20200629.946dbd3-5 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org Usertags: boost174 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, it was discovered that your package failed to build against boost_1.74. Logs can be

Bug#890657: Closing the bug

890657 fixed 2.0.1+dfsg1-1 thanks The newer qcustomplot has a fix for this problem [1]. Thus I am closing this bug. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/qcustomplot/-/blob/master/qcustomplot.h#L83 Thanks for your contribution! Best regards Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing

Bug#972372: sfepy: diff for NMU version 2019.4-2.1

Hi Stefano, thanks for NMU, feel free to upload it immediately. Just push your changes into the git. Best regards, Anton Am Sa., 17. Okt. 2020 um 22:15 Uhr schrieb Stefano Rivera : > > Control: tags 972372 + patch > Control: tags 972372 + pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU

Re: Joining the Debian Science team

Hello Brett! I have added you to the science group on salsa. Welcome on board! Best regards Anton Am Mi., 14. Okt. 2020 um 02:59 Uhr schrieb Brett Gilio : > > Hello all, > > I sent an email a few days back to the debian-devel list about wanting > to begin contributing back to Debian. I am a

Bug#959387: [Re] paraview-dev: missing cmake vtk modules in the dev package, cannot use

Hello Jakob, thanks for work on this huge and difficult packages! Just to let you know, i am going to start to work on recently released VTK9. We can coordinate our work and to try to solve this problem, if it is possible. Best regards Anton Am Fr., 28. Aug. 2020 um 12:09 Uhr schrieb Jakob

Bug#966871: Fixed

966871 fixed 3.3.7-3 thanks -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Debian Science BoF, Debconf20

Dear members of Debian Science Team, I am going to submit a proposal for a BoF (birds of feather) for a DebConf20, where Debian Science Team members and other people can meet and discuss topics, connected to the Debian Science and similar. If somebody wants to join as a co-author, feel free to

Bug#943310: Patch

Hi Helmut, it looks like the patch was not attached. Is it possible to attach it again? Thanks Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#962253: esys-particle: diff for NMU version 2.3.5+dfsg1-4.1

Hello Adrian, thanks a lot for the patch and NMU. I am preparing a new upload of esys-particle and I will integrate your changes. Could you please then cancel yout upload to prevent the race condition? Thanks Anton Am Mi., 10. Juni 2020 um 15:09 Uhr schrieb Adrian Bunk : > > Control: tags

Bug#944197: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

I think I sponsored this package some time ago and I will try to have a look again. Anton Am Mo., 23. März 2020 um 18:33 Uhr schrieb Pierre Saramito : > > Hi Andreas Tille, > > > From Andreas: > > Currently I can only support Covid-19 related > > packages (which we try to assemble in Debian Med

Bug#937455: pygts: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Hi Stuart, Yes, I think it can be removed and reintroduced if the python3-version appears. Regards Anton Am Mi., 29. Jan. 2020 um 02:18 Uhr schrieb Stuart Prescott : > > pygts is dead upstream and the C parts of the code will need a bit of work to > port them to Python 3. This package does

Re: Looking for sponsor for SpaCy package

One more question. Why packages are declared as amd64-only? Anton Am Di., 21. Jan. 2020 um 20:54 Uhr schrieb Anton Gladky : > > Hello Anastasiia, > > I just briefly looked at your packages and have some notes, which > can be applied to most of them: > > - Use compat-level 1

Re: Looking for sponsor for SpaCy package

Hello Anastasiia, I just briefly looked at your packages and have some notes, which can be applied to most of them: - Use compat-level 12. Just add debhelper-compat (= 12) into the Build-Depends and check, whether it builds. - Run "cme fix dpkg" over all packages (please use Debian Testing for

Re: Looking for sponsor for SpaCy package

Hi, I will try to review your packages within the next week. Regards On Sun, Jan 12, 2020, 17:25 Anastasiia Iurshina < anastasiia.iursh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for a sponsor for my spaCy package and its dependencies > (catalogue, srsly, wasabi, thinc, blis and preshed). > >

Bug#929597: CVE-2019-12211 CVE-2019-12212 CVE-2019-12213 CVE-2019-12214

Uploaded! Happy new year! Anton Am Fr., 27. Dez. 2019 um 21:23 Uhr schrieb Hugo Lefeuvre : > > > thanks for your valuable work on this bug! > > Yes, I can prepare update on 30-31st of December. > > that would be great, thanks! :-) > > cheers, > Hugo > > -- > Hugo Lefeuvre (hle)

Bug#929597: CVE-2019-12211 CVE-2019-12212 CVE-2019-12213 CVE-2019-12214

Hi Hugo, thanks for your valuable work on this bug! Yes, I can prepare update on 30-31st of December. Regards Anton On Fri, Dec 27, 2019, 18:01 Hugo Lefeuvre wrote: > > Sounds like a sensible plan, if we are going to release updates as > > well for stretch and buster, so that there is not

Re: vtk8

gt; I've pushed a tentative fix, but cannot verify since it build and used > > to build on the PPA [1]. Best try it out yourself. > > > > Cheers, > > Nico > > > > [1] https://launchpad.net/~nschloe/+archive/ubuntu/vtk8/+build/18120968 > > > > > > >

Bug#946984: yade: Ships python3.8 scripts, without any python3 or python3.8 deps

Hi, it is already done and will be uploaded tonight. The problem is that it should go through NEW-queue. Regards Anton Am Mi., 18. Dez. 2019 um 22:51 Uhr schrieb Dimitri John Ledkov : > > Package: yade > Version: 2019.12~git~0~e74819ea-4 > Severity: grave > > Dear Maintainer, > > Autopkgtest

Bug#946223: [NMU] FTFBS with CGAL 5.0

Hi Joachim, thanks for the patch! Yade is building already in experimental, but not on all archs. I will try to fix it as soon as possible and upload to unstable. Regards Anton Am Do., 5. Dez. 2019 um 21:27 Uhr schrieb Joachim Reichel : > > Source: yade > Version: 2019.01a-3 > Severity:

Bug#945488: Fixed already

forcemerge 944892 945488 thanks -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#929597: [PATCH] CVE-2019-12211: heap buffer overflow via memcpy

Hello Hugo, thanks for update! > Anton, you know this package better than me, would you be available to test > the update? I am also not an expert in the package, but sure, I will try to do it. Regards Anton Am Sa., 23. Nov. 2019 um 10:25 Uhr schrieb Hugo Lefeuvre : > > Hi, > > Upstream

Bug#944878: O: palabos

Package: wnpp Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On behalf of Debian Science Team I intend to orphan palabos package. The package description is: CFD solver based on the lattice Boltzmann method. Development files A software tool for classical CFD,

Re: cyarray_1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Antonio, it looks like the package fails to build now, maybe due to the ongoing python3.8 transition: == dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=pybuild I: pybuild base:217: python3.8 setup.py config Traceback (most recent call last): File

Bug#944010: RM: freefem3d -- ROM; RC-bugs, no interest in the science team, dead upstream

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On behalf of Debian Science Team I request to remove freemat package. The package has RC-Bugs #897752 (FTBFS) and #921459 (dead upstream) and has no an active uploader in the team. After the call [1] no

Bug#874878: [freemat] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

Removal requested: #943958 Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#943958: RM: freemat -- ROM; RC-bug, no active uploader in the team

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On behalf of Debian Science Team I request to remove freemat package. The package has RC-Bug #874878 (depending on Qt4) and has no an active uploader in the team. After the call [1] no interest was

Bug#874878: [freemat] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

Yes, I think the package should be removed. Also the package has no active uploader and nobody in science group identified such an interest [1]. I will take care about it. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2019/09/msg00018.html Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Bug#943918: O: python-bayespy

Package: wnpp Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On behalf of Debian Science Team I intend to orphan python-bayespy package. The package description is: BayesPy provides tools for Bayesian inference with Python. The user constructs a model as a Bayesian

Bug#943879: O: arpack++

Package: wnpp Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On behalf of Debian Science Team I intend to orphan arpack++ package. The package description is: ARPACK++ is an object-oriented version of the ARPACK package. It consists a collection of classes that offers c++

  1   2   >