ian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Pierre Saramito <pierre.saram...@imag.fr>
Description:
librheolef-dev - efficient Finite Element environment - development files
librheolef1 - efficient Finite Element environment - shared library
rheolef- efficient Fi
ian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Pierre Saramito <pierre.saram...@imag.fr>
Description:
librheolef-dev - efficient Finite Element environment - development files
librheolef1 - efficient Finite Element environment - shared library
rheolef- efficient Fi
Hi Andreas,
I just commit with git a new release 6.7-6 of the debianisation
of the rheolef package: it fixes a FTBS bug #79
It also fixes others issues related to the previous 6.7-5 version:
multiarch lib install directory and regeneration of
patched autoconf/automake files (see d/changelog).
Hi Andreas,
> You need to register an account on salsa.debian.org and ask for
> membership of Debian Science team. You also need to create your
> personal Gitlab token.
Ok, I'am asking for membership of Debian Science team
together with an account on salsa.debian.org
Who is managing this ?
Hi Andreas,
Many thanks for your rewrite and modernization
of the Debian files for the Rheolef package in rheolef-6.7-5.
For build time tests to run correctly,
I have now to patch these files,
but I have a technical problem:
After the move from SVN to GIT of the package, I am no more able to
mag.fr
Directeur de Recherche CNRS
Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito
- Mail original -
De: "ginggs" <gin...@debian.org>
À: "PIERRE SARAMITO" <pierre.saram...@imag.fr>, "883987"
<883...@bugs.debia
Hi Andreas,
This problem do neither comes from Rheolef-6.7 nor from CGAL-4.11:
it comes from Boost-1.62 combined with g++ 7.2 in Debian sid and testing.
The bug has already be identified in the upstream version of Boost :
https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/12534
and it is now fixed in the
Dear Joachim,
Many thanks for your patch: I am integrating it
in the debian files of the Rheolef package in order
to support the new CGAL 4.11 version.
Sorry for my late response, I was travelling
in new zealand for conferences...
The path for CGAL will be integrated in the fortcoming
Rheolef
Source: mumps
Severity: wishlist
Dear Adam,
It would be nice to have libmumps-metis-dev and libmumps-parmetis-dev
as alternatives to libmumps-scotch-dev and libmumps-ptscotch-dev packages:
please, could you package mumps with (par)metis also ?
Best wishes,
Pierre
-- System Information:
Dear Martin Michlmayr,
Many thanks for your bug report.
A new upstream version rheolef-6.7 of the source package
should now compile with g++-6 and fix this bug.
Best wishes,
Pierre
--
pierre.saram...@imag.fr
Directeur de Recherche CNRS
Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
Dear Sébastien Villemot,
Many thanks for your bug report.
The new upstream version rheolef-6.7 should fix it now.
Best wishes,
Pierre
--
pierre.saram...@imag.fr
Directeur de Recherche CNRS
Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
http://www-ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito
--
/Pierre.Saramito
- Mail original -
De: "Pierre Saramito" <pierre.saram...@imag.fr>
À: "Sylvestre Ledru" <sylves...@debian.org>, 778...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: "Pierre Saramito" <pierre.saram...@imag.fr>
Envoyé: Vendredi 25 Septembre 2015 13:20:09
Ob
Bonjour Sylvestre,
Je viens de remonter sous svn une nouvelle version de la debianisation de
rheolef :
cela corrige le nouveau probleme a propos de g++ 5 sous sid et testing (bug
#778106 ).
Cela correspond aussi a une nouvelle version 6.6 des sources :
Dear debian maintainers,
I just commit with svn a new release of the debianisation of the rheolef
package.
svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/rheolef/trunk
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewsvn/debian-science/packages/rheolef/trunk
It is associated to a new upstream release 6.6
Dear all,
The RC bug #748130 founded in the scotch library
causes to mark for autoremoval many packages in the jessie distribution.
Notice that the bug do not concern the actual jessie distribution :
it is restricted to the stable one on the amd64 architecture.
Recall that, in that specific
1.4.1-4.2
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13
libscotch-5.1 recommends no packages.
libscotch-5.1 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Yours sincerely,
Pierre Saramito
--
pierre.saram...@imag.fr
Directeur de Recherche CNRS
Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
http://www
16 matches
Mail list logo
